+1 (non binding).
Tested on all corporate production builds.
--
Olivier
-Message d'origine-
De : Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 12 février 2007 05:33
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi,
The assemblies that people are intere
And EAR.
Stéphane
On 2/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 Feb 07, at 11:14 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Is the code used to filter w/properties used by the resources
> plugin easily accessible by other plugins?
>
No.
Brian Topping tried to separate out the logic in
May I ask for generalization of the concept of a filter(chain)? We at
AppFuse need to have HTML Entity conversion capabilities (i.e. ü ->
ü). I once wrote such a filter for ant which I am happy to adapt
and contribute.
Am 14.02.2007 um 06:52 schrieb Jason van Zyl:
On 13 Feb 07, at 11:14
+1 I am in favor of that too (see my previous comment).
Stéphane
On 2/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 Feb 07, at 8:40 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
>
Give me a one line sample of each type of message that's too v
+1
Stéphane
On 2/14/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, the 2.2 release of the maven-rar-plugin has been pending for
many months now. There are a few key bugs fixed in this release:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Rar Plugin - Version 2.2
** Bug
* [MRAR-8] - Rar plugin includes
hahaha!
nice catch... I guess I'm depending too much with my IDE.
I'll do it, thanks.
^_^
Brett Porter wrote:
On 14/02/2007, at 4:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ScmRepository repository = getScmRepositorty( project );
+ScmRepository repository = getScmRepositorty
On 14/02/2007, at 4:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ScmRepository repository = getScmRepositorty( project );
+ScmRepository repository = getScmRepositorty( project,
false );
I know you didn't introduce it, but you drew attention to it... can
we fix the spelling he
+1
On 13 Feb 07, at 11:59 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Hello, the 2.2 release of the maven-rar-plugin has been pending for
many months now. There are a few key bugs fixed in this release:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Rar Plugin - Version 2.2
** Bug
* [MRAR-8] - Rar plugin includes fi
On 13 Feb 07, at 11:14 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Is the code used to filter w/properties used by the resources
plugin easily accessible by other plugins?
No.
Brian Topping tried to separate out the logic into a component. It's
definitely needed in the sources and war plugin so t
+1
Works fine on my projects
Arnaud
On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehau
I put some comments with examples of WARNING messages in this JIRA I
just created:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2823
--jason
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Feb 07, at 8:40 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Any comments from the Maven developers on thi
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
On 2/14/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
I really think all these WARNING messages are more harmful than
useful... running a build thats all I see when I glance at the
console. Th
Here is my (non-binding) +1
--jason
On 2/13/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, the 2.2 release of the maven-rar-plugin has been pending for
many months now. There are a few key bugs fixed in this release:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Rar Plugin - Version 2.2
** Bug
* [MRAR
Hello, the 2.2 release of the maven-rar-plugin has been pending for
many months now. There are a few key bugs fixed in this release:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Rar Plugin - Version 2.2
** Bug
* [MRAR-8] - Rar plugin includes files from rarSourceDirectory
in the generated rar
* [MRAR
Looks like site bits are not in the source jar, so I will start a vote.
--jason
On Feb 13, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Looks good. Did you get the patch to apply to the site docs to
include the correct ASF license bits?
Do you need to re-roll the staged release with those change
Looks good. Did you get the patch to apply to the site docs to
include the correct ASF license bits?
Do you need to re-roll the staged release with those changes?
If not, I'm happy to start a vote on what's there now.
Thanks,
--jason
On Feb 13, 2007, at 7:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
On 2/14/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
I really think all these WARNING messages are more harmful than
useful... running a build thats all I see when I glance at the
console. Th
In case you did not get the patch I mailed to you, I pasted it here:
http://rifers.org/paste/jdillon/show/3539
--jason
On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:57 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Mail me the patch as I think they get scrubbed off the list.
jason.
On 13 Feb 07, at 9:42 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon
Is the code used to filter w/properties used by the resources plugin
easily accessible by other plugins?
--jason
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13 Feb 07, at 9:56 PM 13 Feb 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh I didn't check... Will look again when I get home.
You can look here for an example release using a stage:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--release-maven-ejb-plugin-2.1-
tf3189055s177.html#a8855842
And the release is staged here:
On 13 Feb 07, at 10:01 PM 13 Feb 07, Barrie Treloar wrote:
On 2/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 Feb 07, at 8:40 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
>
Give me a one line sample of each type of message that's too verbos
I just updated the dep to a released version of maven-archiver. Try
it again on your stuff to make sure, i'll apply your patch and I'll
push it to a stage for voting but you can send the mail for the vote :-)
Jason.
On 13 Feb 07, at 9:42 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
The current codebas
On 2/14/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 Feb 07, at 8:40 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
>
Give me a one line sample of each type of message that's too verbose,
and I can see about flipping it to debug instead of info.
Oh I didn't check... Will look again when I get home.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:59:10
To:"Maven Developers List"
Subject: Re: maven-rar-plugin 2.2 release?
There is also a snapshot release in there so if it's depe
There is also a snapshot release in there so if it's dependent on
maven-archiver-2.1-SNAPSHOT then that will need to be released too
unless you know it works with a previous version.
jason.
On 13 Feb 07, at 9:42 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
The current codebase looks good except for th
Mail me the patch as I think they get scrubbed off the list.
jason.
On 13 Feb 07, at 9:42 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
The current codebase looks good except for the parent version and
some license bits on .apt docs, apply the attached patch and it
should be good.
Should probably als
The current codebase looks good except for the parent version and
some license bits on .apt docs, apply the attached patch and it
should be good.
Should probably also include LICENSE.txt in the jar too, but I'm not
sure how you guys do that.
* * *
Thanks for helping get this done, its b
On 13 Feb 07, at 8:40 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
Give me a one line sample of each type of message that's too verbose,
and I can see about flipping it to debug instead of info.
Jason.
I really think all these WARNING messages ar
On 2/14/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
I really think all these WARNING messages are more harmful than
useful... running a build thats all I see when I glance at the
console. They really make it much more harder than really needed
On 13 Feb 07, at 8:34 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
Aight, I will build whats there and see if its functional.
So far I think the only change needed is to change the parent
version to 8 (from 8-SNAPSHOT).
Will know more once the G server build finishes...
If you take a quick pass I'
Any comments from the Maven developers on this one?
I really think all these WARNING messages are more harmful than
useful... running a build thats all I see when I glance at the
console. They really make it much more harder than really needed to
_see_ what is really going on.
That, and
Aight, I will build whats there and see if its functional.
So far I think the only change needed is to change the parent version
to 8 (from 8-SNAPSHOT).
Will know more once the G server build finishes...
--jason
On Feb 13, 2007, at 5:10 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 13 Feb 07, at 7:52 PM
On 13 Feb 07, at 7:52 PM 13 Feb 07, Jason Dillon wrote:
When is this release going to happen? We (Geronimo) have been
using 2.2-SNAPSHOT for quite some time now to get around:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRAR-13 (.svn dirs included)
If there is nothing else major pending I would re
This one has also been straggling for sometime, the "A lone zero
block at":
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXCOMP-38
This one will have some impact on users... as they might think the
distribution is corrupt... which its not, though one can't really
tell since the plexus tar componen
When is this release going to happen? We (Geronimo) have been using
2.2-SNAPSHOT for quite some time now to get around:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRAR-13 (.svn dirs included)
If there is nothing else major pending I would really appreciate a
2.2 release of this plugin.
--jason
This one too:
* http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2172
--jason
On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Hey, there are a few critical bugs which the Geronimo (and other)
builds are currently working around. Specifically:
* http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2796
* http://ji
Hey, there are a few critical bugs which the Geronimo (and other)
builds are currently working around. Specifically:
* http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2796
* http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1911
Is anyone looking at addressing these problems... hopefully for an up
coming 2.0.x rel
Works on our builds with pde-maven-plugin, native-maven-plugin,
maven-dependency-plugin, and ofcourse java.
-D
On 2/13/07, Barrie Treloar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 (I get a binding vote, yay)
Works on our project which includes an uber-archive of artifacts and
an eclipse pde build
-
+1 (I get a binding vote, yay)
Works on our project which includes an uber-archive of artifacts and
an eclipse pde build
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 works on my most complicated build, no problems.
>
> 2007/2/11, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/mave
> > n/
> > maven-core/2.0.5/
> >
> > He
The license should be inside the pom section, or in the
maven1 repo in the .license files
On 2/13/07, Deepak Bhole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
What license are the pom files in the maven2 repository
(repo1.maven.org/maven2) under? We need to know if we are allowed to
redistribute those pom
This is my take:
- if they contain a license block in the file, then it's that
license, otherwise
- if they contain element(s), then those license(s), otherwise
- Apache License 2.0
I'll run this past the PMC to see if we all believe this consistently.
On 14/02/2007, at 7:10 AM, Deepak Bhole
Hi,
What license are the pom files in the maven2 repository
(repo1.maven.org/maven2) under? We need to know if we are allowed to
redistribute those poms with Fedora.
Thanks,
Deepak
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
+1 \o/ woohoo!
On 2/13/07, Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our trunks build fine: +1
Thanks,
Vincent
2007/2/11, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/ap
Our trunks build fine: +1
Thanks,
Vincent
2007/2/11, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehaus.
+1 (non-binding)
Dan
> Stephane Nicoll wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This release fixes all known issues.
> >
> > Release Notes - Maven 2.x Sources Plugin - Version 2.0.3
> >
> > ** Bug
> > * [MSOURCES-6] - Sources plugin ignores resource includes/excludes
> >
> > ** Improvement
> > * [MSOURCES-1
On 13 Feb 07, at 9:41 AM 13 Feb 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/
maven/maven-core/2.0.5/ Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=10500&fixfor=12294&so
Mostly windows, but also some flavors of linux (Fedora 6 and a custom
built kernel).
-Original Message-
From: Fabrice Bellingard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 4:17 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5 (take 2)
Hi Brian,
Strang
Actually, sorry for being misleading, but checkstyle as an extension
seems to work just fine for me. However, I did notice that another
case where I was using a build extension is broken for me. Again
sorry for the confusion. I've created an issue for what I saw:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse
Hi Brian,
Strange, hey?... Which OS are you running Maven on? Because Stephen's got
the same error as me on Fedore Core 6...
Fabrice.
On 2/13/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Fabrice,
I'm doing exactly what you describe and from what I can see, the latest
2.0.5 is working ok. I
Works fine for me, +1
fabrizio
On 2/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/org/apache/maven/
maven-core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehaus.org/s
52 matches
Mail list logo
