Weird artifact downloads from mvn

Anyone seeing weird artifact downloads, like: Downloading: http://repository.codehaus.org/junit/junit/3.8.1/ junit-3.8.1.jar 897b downloaded [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for junit/junit/3.8.1/junit-3.8.1.jar - IGNORING This was from a build of server/bran

Re: Maven 2.0.5 - open bugs?

On 25 Jan 07, at 3:38 PM 25 Jan 07, Fabrice Bellingard wrote: Jason, what about the issues I had when testing version 2.0.5, and for which I sent you a project that reproduces one of the bug? (transitive dependency resolution problem and checkstyle plugin failure). Did you identify them a

Re: maven-project patch

On 25 Jan 07, at 2:24 PM 25 Jan 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 10:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: maven-project patch Inside MDEP-44 is a maven-project patch that

Re: [vote] merge id-refactor branch changes

These run without errors/failures after latest updates. Please let me know if you still encounter errors. Rahul - Original Message - From: "Emmanuel Venisse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:41 PM Subject: Re: [vote] merge id-refactor branch changes -

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (37 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184 MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques htt

Re: Including webdav-wagon in future Maven releases

Thanks. I'll also have to be on the lookout now for the potential classloading issues. For others information, the issues are: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2664 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2228 Brett, can I assume that setting the extension in a profile at least prevent the issu

Re: Including webdav-wagon in future Maven releases

There is an issue in MNG to include it, and I included in there the reasons why we shouldn't. We can probably do it in 2.1 where the classloaders behave better. - Brett On 26/01/2007, at 10:27 AM, Stephen Duncan wrote: Any reason not to? I only see one webdav specific issue open: http://ji

Re: Maven 2.0.5 - open bugs?

Jason, what about the issues I had when testing version 2.0.5, and for which I sent you a project that reproduces one of the bug? (transitive dependency resolution problem and checkstyle plugin failure). Did you identify them as "real" issues and postponed them to 2.0.6? Or maybe found they weren

Including webdav-wagon in future Maven releases

Any reason not to? I only see one webdav specific issue open: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-49 which doesn't seem to be a blocker to me. I'm using it as a build extension currently, and it works fine, and I plan to use webdav as our production distribution tool soon. In order to deploy

RE: maven-project patch

Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 10:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: maven-project patch Inside MDEP-44 is a maven-project patch that resolves an issue getting attached artifacts from a react

Re: Maven 2.0.5 - open bugs?

On 26/01/2007, at 6:37 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: It was http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2773. Were any changes made or did it just get closed as a duplicate? If someone applied it and tested it then I suppose it's fine. I haven't tested it myself yet and wasn't sure anyone else had so

Re: Maven 2.0.5 - open bugs?

On 25 Jan 07, at 11:13 AM 25 Jan 07, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 1/25/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is one issue which Trygve raised which I thought he assigned to 2.0.5. It is the issue where Maven is trying to continually try to find snapshots instead of only checking daily.

Re: Maven 2.0.5 - open bugs?

On 1/25/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is one issue which Trygve raised which I thought he assigned to 2.0.5. It is the issue where Maven is trying to continually try to find snapshots instead of only checking daily. It was http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2773. Were a

Re: Maven 2.0.5 - open bugs?

There is one issue which Trygve raised which I thought he assigned to 2.0.5. It is the issue where Maven is trying to continually try to find snapshots instead of only checking daily. I am done with my crunch at a client this week so I'll call the vote tomorrow afternoon. Jason. On 25

Re: Maven and JDK 1.6

On Tuesday 23 January 2007 17:19, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: > Anyways I experienced slightly differences of JDK6 when dealing with XML > (e.g. XmlUnits fail with JDK6 that work with any JDK <= 5, might be a bug > in JAVA6) and also when using collections (iterator orderung of unordered > collections c

Maven 2.0.5 - open bugs?

Hi, few days ago there was a lot of interest in a thread calling a vote for releasing maven 2.0.5 (http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Maven-2.0.5-tf2966962s177.html) ... most of the vote were +1 and I thought it was going to be released soon. Also in JIRA (http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNa

Re: [m2] how about cutting a maven-ejb-plugin alpha release ?

On 1/25/07, Dário Oliveros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Stéphane. BTW, do have any idea about the time frame for that ? I'd like to include a few issues before releasing 2.1. If it takes too much time, I'll cast a vote for alpha-1. Regards, Stéphane Dário Stephane Nicoll-2 wrote: >

Re: [m2] how about cutting a maven-ejb-plugin alpha release ?

Thanks Stéphane. BTW, do have any idea about the time frame for that ? Dário Stephane Nicoll-2 wrote: > > Sounds good. I'd like to do it actually (and a release of the EAR > plugin) but I am waiting for specific release info from the team. > > I'll try to synch with Jason as early as possible