Hi,
Just doing some work on the integration tests and trying to automate
the installation of the support artifacts and I found this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/
core-integration-testing-support/1.1-old-location/pom.xml
Which has a relocation elemen
[accidentally sent previously to maven list]
I submitted a patch a while ago to make continuum compatible with sql
server. It simply reduces the size of fields that where 8192 to 8000
bytes. Is this acceptable to commit?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-697
Thanks,
Brian
Best to discuss on continuum-dev. We recently considered the same
thing for mysql (which required 255 instead of 256 on some fields) -
but we were concerned about backwards compat with derby and other
databases already using 256 characters.
- Brett
On 13/01/2007, at 3:18 PM, Brian E. Fox w
I submitted a patch a while ago to make continuum compatible with sql
server. It simply reduces the size of fields that where 8192 to 8000
bytes. Is this acceptable to commit?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-697
Thanks,
Brian
Hi,
As we voted upon, the permissions have now been changed. If you are a
committer anywhere in Maven, you now (technically) can commit to any
subprojects or branches in the Maven tree.
But as was discussed, this doesn't change each of our
responsibilities in the community. Maven is big -
+1
Stéphane
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The entire release is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/org/apache/maven/maven-
core/2.0
Looks better. Change my (non-binding) vote to +1. :-)
Thanks!
Dan
On Friday 12 January 2007 16:55, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On 12 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 12 Jan 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > Well, I hate to do this cause I REALLY would like to see 2.0.5
> > out, but...
> >
> > -1, non-binding, but t
On 12 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 12 Jan 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Well, I hate to do this cause I REALLY would like to see 2.0.5
out, but...
-1, non-binding, but these are legal issues
Issues:
1) The NOTICE.TXT file in the root of the binary package only
mentions Apache
stuff. However, I see a
This is a bug in the assembly plugin (or more specifically, the
plexus-archiver).
- Brett
On 13/01/2007, at 8:18 AM, Tomasz Pik wrote:
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12 Jan 07, at 2:15 PM 12 Jan 07, Tomasz Pik wrote:
> On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12 Jan 07, at 2:15 PM 12 Jan 07, Tomasz Pik wrote:
> On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/org/apache/maven/maven-
>> core/2.0.5/
>
> Can something be done with:
> tar: A lo
Verified previous snapshot and the assembly below both work fine on my
build.
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 11:45 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.5
Hi,
The entire release is staged here
On 12 Jan 07, at 3:57 PM 12 Jan 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The entire release is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvan
On 12 Jan 07, at 2:15 PM 12 Jan 07, Tomasz Pik wrote:
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/org/apache/maven/maven-
core/2.0.5/
Can something be done with:
tar: A lone zero block at 4174
It's with tar 1.16 on windows/cygwin
Not
This would be good... Many users are going to wonder if maven built assemblies
are corrupt or not because of this.
If not for 2.0.5 maybe 2.0.6 can quickly follow with some of these little
details cleaned up?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: "Tomasz Pik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The entire release is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/org/apache/maven/maven-
core/2.0.5/
Here is
We'd previously been trying to get things out of trunk (since sandbox
stuff isn't released, or branched, or anything like that until it
gets moved out).
I'm not sure if that config is possible, but could certainly go
through listing them all out if it was preferable to do /maven/*/
sandbox
On 1/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/org/apache/maven/maven-
core/2.0.5/
Can something be done with:
tar: A lone zero block at 4174
It's with tar 1.16 on windows/cygwin
Not a bug but a little annoying warning.
Regards,
Tomek
---
Well, I hate to do this cause I REALLY would like to see 2.0.5 out, but...
-1, non-binding, but these are legal issues
Issues:
1) The NOTICE.TXT file in the root of the binary package only mentions Apache
stuff. However, I see a jsch jar, jtidy jar, and xml-apis jar that
certainly are not a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I'm a relative newcomer to Maven 2 and have installed the 2.0.4 release
as described on the project download page. I have discovered a number of
problems with the idea:module goal, at least some of which have been
reported before and marked resolved in vers
Hello all,
I'm a relative newcomer to Maven 2 and have installed the 2.0.4 release
as described on the project download page. I have discovered a number of
problems with the idea:module goal, at least some of which have been
reported before and marked resolved in version 2.1 (according to
http://j
Hi,
The entire release is staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/
The assemblies that people are interested in are staged here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-2.0.5/org/apache/maven/maven-
core/2.0.5/
Here is the JIRA roadmap:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Is
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Vincent Siveton a écrit :
>> 2007/1/12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Author: evenisse
>>> Date: Fri Jan 12 01:05:58 2007
>>> New Revision: 495520
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=495520
>>> Log:
>>> Fix maven-* version
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>>
Vincent Siveton a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,
2007/1/12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Author: evenisse
Date: Fri Jan 12 01:05:58 2007
New Revision: 495520
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=495520
Log:
Fix maven-* version
[SNIP]
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
org.apache.mav
Isn't it possible to have [:*/trunk/sandbox/] in the svn config?
If so we could move all of '/maven/sandbox/(*)' in your proposal
below to /maven/$1/trunk/sandbox/, so each trunk has a sandbox.
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Thought I'd put this to a vote in case others weren't following the
proposa
Hi Emmanuel,
2007/1/12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Author: evenisse
Date: Fri Jan 12 01:05:58 2007
New Revision: 495520
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=495520
Log:
Fix maven-* version
[SNIP]
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
org.apache.maven
maven-project
-
+1
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 3:05 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] consolidate sandboxes
Hi,
Thought I'd put this to a vote in case others weren't following the
proposal.
Same as the previous proposal, so
Hi Brett,
"Maven JXR" [1] has a wrong configuration. Seems to be related to maven 2.0.x
Could you glance?
Cheers,
Vincent
[1]
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/projectGroupSummary.action?projectGroupId=13
2007/1/9, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Continuum is up and running for
+0 for me (a bit late)
-Vincent
On 1/12/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After the allotted 72 hours, the results stand as:
Full proposal: 9 (7 PMC, 2 committers): Brett, Arnaud, Emmanuel,
Trygve, Dennis, Fabrizio, Lukas, Rahul, Milos
Partial proposal: 6 (6 PMC): Joakim, John T, Ken
On 1/12/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marcelo Fukushima wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Marcelo Fukushima wrote:
>> > yeah...
>> > but now that ive settled it, ive encountered a new set of probs, this
>> > time in the data-management with the t
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
what matters more, IMO, would be micro releases of the core
plugins.
I agree very much here.
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Thought I'd put this to a vote in case others weren't following the
proposal.
Same as the previous proposal, so carrying over the +1 from Emmanuel,
Dennis, Rahul, Trygve, Arnaud, Vincent S, Joakim, and myself unless
they say otherwise.
When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all
31 matches
Mail list logo
