Brett Porter wrote:
[ ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permissions
---
Hi guys (and Jason particularly),
I just added maven-model in continuum 1.0.3 to build it and it fails with
a plexus error
http://maven.zones.apache.org:8180/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm?view=ProjectBuild&buildId=55&id=9
I don't have this problem when I build it with m1 i
Hi guys,
Since some days I'm working on modello / maven-model / m1-core.
Here is the current status. If you have some comments ... feel free
Modello
To resolve relative entities in the POM (to keep the compatibility with
maven 1.0.x) I had to update the STAX-RI plugin to add a new read method
Hello dear devs.
After everyone's help, ive noticed that jpox was saving the
BuildDefinition with wrong values (the buildFresh and arguments and
possibly others too)... since i dont know how jpox work, the first
thing i tried was to update to a more recent version of it (namely
1.1.3) and everyth
/maven/KEYS is not used and all references should be removed.
/maven/project/KEYS is it
I didn't want to put it at the top of the tree as I was told is
encourages a checkout of the whole Maven tree ...
Jason.
On 9 Jan 07, at 5:45 PM 9 Jan 07, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
What is the differ
Hi,
What is the difference between /maven/KEYS and /maven/project/KEYS?
Cheers,
Vincent
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it's automatic now, let me know if there's any problem
On 1/9/07, Ben Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We've just uploaded Spring 2.0.2 to our local repository. Can we get
a sync to the main maven repo please? Thanks.
-Ben
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too
We've just uploaded Spring 2.0.2 to our local repository. Can we get
a sync to the main maven repo please? Thanks.
-Ben
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Brett Porter wrote:
On 09/01/2007, at 11:49 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
How about I go ahead and publish this one instead of the one that's
currently here?
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/
Yes, please.
- Brett
Done (not synced yet).
--
Dennis Lundberg
--
Brett Porter wrote:
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[ ] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permissions
Cheers,
Brett
--
Denn
+1
--
Dennis Lundberg
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I think
it was the intention to do this for all sandboxes, but that wasn't the
case in practice.
To have a cleaner ACL, and cleaner externals on /trunks, I'd like to
propose we co
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
On 1/9/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
> ok, commented on them all.
Thanks for the feedback Brett. I've closed three of them. Here's an
example site which shows the new externalLink image in action:
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl
Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> There is already a patch, see the linked issues.
>
Thanks. I'll try that one.
Cheers,
Christoph
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-maven-eclipse-plugin--addVersionToProjectName-tf2946864s177.html#a8241478
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing
Cool. Thanks.
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I'd be happy to add nmaven to it.
On 10/01/2007, at 3:34 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
> Hi Brett,
>
> Is Continuum available for Maven 2 projects under incubation?
>
> Thanks,
> Shane
>
> On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes, I'd be happy to add nmaven to it.
On 10/01/2007, at 3:34 AM, Shane Isbell wrote:
Hi Brett,
Is Continuum available for Maven 2 projects under incubation?
Thanks,
Shane
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Continuum is up and running for all Maven 2 projects at http://
Hi Brett,
Is Continuum available for Maven 2 projects under incubation?
Thanks,
Shane
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Continuum is up and running for all Maven 2 projects at http://
maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/. I'll keep an eye on it, and see if
we can't keep it g
My understanding was the opposite. I thought that reports that
support aggregate run the child reports themselves so they can get the
data to aggregate because the site lifecycle does not support it. Am
I misunderstanding it?
I'm pretty sure parent reports run first but I'd like to hear evidenc
Christoph Kiehl wrote on Tuesday, January 09, 2007 4:28 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone is working on
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-44 ? I definitely need this
> feature, because I got a multimodule project of which I need to keep
> multiple versions (branches) in _one_ eclip
We're going to be releasing a new version (looking like tomorrow) so
you can take a look at the roadmap after that.
jason.
On 9 Jan 07, at 10:28 AM 9 Jan 07, Christoph Kiehl wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone is working on http://jira.codehaus.org/
browse/MECLIPSE-44 ? I definitely need
Hi,
Continuum is up and running for all Maven 2 projects at http://
maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/. I'll keep an eye on it, and see if
we can't keep it going this time.
If you want to use it, just register and ping me (or once they've
signed up, another pmc member) to get appropriate ka
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone is working on
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-44 ? I definitely need this feature,
because I got a multimodule project of which I need to keep multiple versions
(branches) in _one_ eclipse workspace.
I would be happy to contribute a solution if no one al
Isn't that what the aggregate parameter is for in individual report mojo's?
They have a check: if aggregrate = true, and the current project is not the
reactor
root, they skip the build. If not, they generate the report using data from
the reactor projects.
AFAIK parent projects are executed _af
You can add it in the current project group, but you'll have project names
duplicated (trunk and branch) if you don't rename project names.
The way I prefer is to create a new project group and you can choose what you
want for the groupId (org.apache.maven[2.0.x branch] ?)
Emmanuel
Brett Porte
I'd like to add Maven 2.0.5 to continuum in the same way I have added
trunk.
But how am I supposed to do this with the new project groups? It
should probably have it's own group (since there is no way to
particularly configure the alternate branch within an existing one),
but the group id
Brett Porter wrote:
[(re)moved parts of original mail:]
[ ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current
There's a case (aggregating reports) where it would be useful to have
a parent project's site generate AFTER the children's site is
generated. Would it be possible and/or easy to add an report
lifecycle event which is called on the parent reports after the
children are processed?
mike
-
+1
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I
> think it was the intention to do this for all sandboxes, but that
> wasn't the case in practice.
>
> To have a cleaner ACL, and cleaner externals on /trunks, I'd like to
> propose we cons
[ ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for
the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[X] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permissions
+0
Stéphane
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-451
+0
Vincent
2007/1/8, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-4510-469B-A
Hi,
In the same way of Brett's thread [1], WDYT to move all
/maven/*/*-site to /maven/site/*?
Actually, archiva, jxr and doxia have no standard layout for site and
problems of deployment can appear (throw a glance to [2] about doxia
site). We could consolidate them instead of. Thoughts?
Cheers,
+1 for this
Vincent
2007/1/9, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
Arnaud
On 1/8/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I
> think it was the intention to do this for all sandboxes, but that
> wasn't the case i
+1
Arnaud
On 1/8/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I
think it was the intention to do this for all sandboxes, but that
wasn't the case in practice.
To have a cleaner ACL, and cleaner externals on /trunks, I'd like
Yep, that's the intent. Just that there are various modules in the
current sandbox, so I'm grouping them by subproject in the example.
On 09/01/2007, at 7:25 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I
think it was th
+1 on the collapsing of access groups
Milos
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rd
Cody Zhang wrote:
Dear Lady/Gentleman,
I am a maven user. I follow the command
(http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html ):
rsync -v -t -l -r mirrors.ibiblio.org::maven2 /tmp/maven2
But, it is failure.
Seems to be working for me, at least it starts to fetch th
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I think
it was the intention to do this for all sandboxes, but that wasn't the
case in practice.
To have a cleaner ACL, and cleaner externals on /trunks, I'd like to
propose we consolidate the sandboxes.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 8 Jan 07, at 3:26 AM 8 Jan 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 7 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 7 Jan 07, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
On 1/7/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Jan 07, at 1:45 PM 6 Jan 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MREPOSITORY-2 proj
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
On 1/2/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [discuss] iBatis, JPA and Java 5.0
> I've been thinking stay with JDO for now, look at JPA
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I think
it was the intention to do this for all sandboxes, but that wasn't the
case in practice.
To have a cleaner ACL, and cleaner externals on /trunks, I'd like to
propose we consolida
+1 with same comment.
I don't think committers that don't know enough a project will commit on it
except for basic patches.
Emmanuel
Arnaud HERITIER a écrit :
[ X ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
We are all enough adul
42 matches
Mail list logo
