Maven 2.0.4 was released 2006-04-10 (according to JIRA),
9 months ago.
We've been using a 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT for a while now, because of the
bug (MNG-1797) and for us it seems stable.
Sometimes it looks like many users are using the SNAPSHOT actually.
According to jira 11 issues remain:
http://ji
Yes I can access. I also purged the local repository.
I also tried to build it without the previous maven, using ant but it did
not work as well. definging additinal profiles like instructed in
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-plugin-snapshot-repositories.html
did help as well.
t
I think it makes sense to have these modules consolidated under one
umbrella.
+1
Cheers,
Rahul
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 10:38 AM
Subject: [proposal] consolidate sandboxes
Hi,
When w
The metadata file (and enhanced classes) are generated when you use
Maven to build the project. As long as eclipse doesn't overwrite the
class files it should be fine. Alternatively, you can use the eclipse
plugin for jpox to make sure the classes get enhanced and just run
maven once to gen
The metadata mapping (.jdo) file can be found under
target/generated-classes/META-INF when you run:
> mvn clean install
on continuum-model.
Besides, you can also choose to enhance the model class explicitly by
> mvn jpox:enhance
I have seen some annoyances running tests in Eclipse, most of t
hello folks! i sent a couple of emails to the user list, but i guess i
could help a little too, right? so i just checked out the code from
SVN and wanted to tackle
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-1103
while i could isolate the bug (the property is not getting persisted
on the db) but sin
+1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote for the
next option if vote doesn't pass)
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
On 09/01/2007, at 10:50 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
On 1/9/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
> ok, commented on them all.
Thanks for the feedback Brett. I've closed three of them. Here's an
example site which shows the new externalLink image in action:
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/doxia/
Hi Denis,
Ju
On 09/01/2007, at 11:49 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
How about I go ahead and publish this one instead of the one that's
currently here?
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/
Yes, please.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
Brett Porter wrote:
ok, commented on them all.
Thanks for the feedback Brett. I've closed three of them. Here's an
example site which shows the new externalLink image in action:
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/doxia/
How about I go ahead and publish this one instead of the one that's
c
On 09/01/2007, at 10:50 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
[X] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
[ ] +1 for the partial proposal - retain subproject access
restrictions
[ ] 0 abstain from vote
[ ] -1 do not alter the current permis
[ X ] +1 for the full proposal - collapse all groups (implies a vote
for the next option if vote doesn't pass)
We are all enough adult to know what we can(not) do. And everything is
stored in an SCM thus we can remove any error introduced by someone else.
Arnaud
On 1/9/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL
-1
On 8 Jan 07, at 6:50 PM 8 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-4510-
Hi,
Since there was no objection to calling a vote, as discussed in the
proposal, I'd like to call a vote on this.
To see the proposal and discussion: http://mail-archives.apache.org/
mod_mbox/maven-dev/200612.mbox/%3c67FC84B5-4510-469B-AEC1-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote to operate as
- requiri
Hi there,
>> I had no specific objections once the 2.1-SNAPSHOT dependency was
>> removed.
>>
>> There are 2 open issues for the current version, though, and I'm a bit
>> concerned at releasing it as "final" when there are 64 other issues
>> open. Should it still be beta?
+1
>
> I just want to ge
Hi,
When we earlier opened the Maven sandbox to all ASF committers, I
think it was the intention to do this for all sandboxes, but that
wasn't the case in practice.
To have a cleaner ACL, and cleaner externals on /trunks, I'd like to
propose we consolidate the sandboxes.
The structure w
Hi,
I'd like to release the ear plugin which contains a backward
compatibility issue in 2.3 [1]. The issue has been fixed and the
reporter has validated his builds successfully.
Revision 492264
Snapshot available
http://people.apache.org/~snicoll/maven-stage-repo/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-
Can you access
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-site-plugin/2.0-SNAPSHOT/
?
I doubt any remote connection has been made because the build took less than a
second.
Check your mirror/proxy settings, possibly purge the local repository.
-- Kenne
Hi all,
I am trying to build maven 2.1 from repository (from scratch) to no success.
I need ver 2.1 and not 2.0. please help.
I have added the profiles to the settings.xml according to
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-plugin-snapshot-repositories.html
but it does not help.
Att
what failure
On 1/8/07, Cody Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Lady/Gentleman,
I am a maven user. I follow the command
(http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html ):
rsync -v -t -l -r mirrors.ibiblio.org::maven2 /tmp/maven2
But, it is failure.
Please tell me
On 8 Jan 07, at 3:26 AM 8 Jan 07, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 7 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 7 Jan 07, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
On 1/7/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Jan 07, at 1:45 PM 6 Jan 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MREPOSITORY-2 project.scm.connection sho
done
On 1/8/07, Tom Huybrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody deploy a surefire snapshot (including the
surefire-junit4 provider) ?
thanks,
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comman
Hi,
Could somebody deploy a surefire snapshot (including the
surefire-junit4 provider) ?
thanks,
Tom
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Lady/Gentleman,
I am a maven user. I follow the command
(http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html ):
rsync -v -t -l -r mirrors.ibiblio.org::maven2 /tmp/maven2
But, it is failure.
Please tell me how to do it ?
Thanks!
cody
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 7 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 7 Jan 07, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
On 1/7/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Jan 07, at 1:45 PM 6 Jan 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MREPOSITORY-2 project.scm.connection should not be required for
> bundle-create
>
Why not?
the
25 matches
Mail list logo
