On 1/6/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/6/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the site-deploy use the -Preporting profile? If not, won't some of
> the pages be incorrect?
Thanks, it does now. :)
Or not. I'm having trouble with the profile (NPE or a complaint abo
On 1/6/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does the site-deploy use the -Preporting profile? If not, won't some of
the pages be incorrect?
Thanks, it does now. :)
I added a note about it to
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Development+Procedures since I
couldn't find it mentione
Does the site-deploy use the -Preporting profile? If not, won't some of
the pages be incorrect?
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 10:59 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Please fix http://maven.apache.org/plugins page
On 1/6/07, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins no longer has the right index page
Done, by executing 'mvn site-deploy' in maven/site. It will take an
hour or so to sync.
(I have Continuum building all the plugins, and recently added
site-deploy to the build d
http://maven.apache.org/plugins no longer has the right index page
-D
Hi all,
I've been bold enough to prepare a little patch that adds explicit
support for JBoss to the Archiva WAR.
The patch adds a jboss-web.xml file (this should be totally harmless)
and adds a to web.xml. I get the impression that this
latter change is harmless as well, or would it break other
On 6 Jan 07, at 1:45 PM 6 Jan 07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fgiust
Date: Sat Jan 6 10:45:46 2007
New Revision: 493534
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493534
Log:
MREPOSITORY-2 project.scm.connection should not be required for
bundle-create
Why not?
Modified:
Seems to be related to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2731
I am trying to trace through it but the tests are not behaving at all :(
A
On 6 Jan 2007, at 14:44, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Thanks Kenney.
I have a NPE now in MPIR for plexus-i18n:1.0-beta-7-SNAPSHOT
If I roll back to 1.0-beta-6 i
>
> - How do other projects deal with emeritus committers? Is this
> conforming to
> apache-wide standards?
We had a discussion about that on jakarta-general (was a while ago), and the
general feeling is that
karma should only be removed if people stated that they want that to happen.
That doe
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
- these people should be send a direct e-mail notifying them so they
know what's going on. If they've been unactive in such a long
period it's higly likely that they don't follow the dev list anymore,
and should they want to participate again they'd be in for a big sur
Thanks Kenney.
I have a NPE now in MPIR for plexus-i18n:1.0-beta-7-SNAPSHOT
If I roll back to 1.0-beta-6 in MPIR, all works.
Need to investigate...
Cheers,
Vincent
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.codehaus.plexus.i18n.DefaultI18N.getBundle(DefaultI18N.java:141)
at org.codeh
Hi,
+1
I have some comments though:
- maybe the list could also be kept in svn or svn metadata somewhere
(perhaps explicitly listing them with no karma, such as @emeritus=ro in
svn config?) since web pages aren't really good for archiving
- these people should be send a direct e-mail notifyi
I deployed that yesterday (about 20 hours ago or so).
Are you still having problems?
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
2006/12/25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Dec 25 20:31:42 2006
New Revision: 490254
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=490254
Log:
o
Very cool. I've used it extensively last Friday and it helps a lot.
Cheers,
Stéphane
On 1/6/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Results: 3 Binding (Fabrizio, Stephane, John) (Jason voted on original
vote pre MDEP-52) + 2 Committers (Dan, Brian) + 2 Users.
The release will proceed this
14 matches
Mail list logo
