+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within those
votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is > 0). Other
votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not binding.
- Votes can be changed
- An emeritus committer can request commit access again at any time
they feel they can be active, and a vote will be held to accept them
or not.
I'm not a Maven committer so this is a "peanut gallery" comment, but the
corresponding policy in other similar situations I've seen across Apache is
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
I'd like to propose we make Barrie a committer. He has contributed a lot
of small patches, and recently seems to be the "does it work on
Windows?" watchdog. He in particular has done a lot with the assembly
plugin and has also dug into some of the components
Heh :)
On 04/01/2007, at 5:36 PM, Dion Gillard wrote:
That list is woefully out of date.
This one is way more telling:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/developer-activity-report.html
On 12/29/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm just curious, what problem does establish
Hi,
Vote to operate as
- requiring 2/3rds of the PMC to vote (13), with a majority within
those votes for it to pass (ie, add them all and if the result is >
0). Other votes would be welcome with reasons as advisory, but not
binding.
- Votes can be changed at any time before result is post
That list is woefully out of date.
This one is way more telling:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/developer-activity-report.html
On 12/29/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm just curious, what problem does establishing a list of emeritus
> committers solve?
When you see
Sorry, just catching up on a couple of these now.
Myself and Brett can flip SVN bits and generally one of us is
around. And if you're a committer you've already got access to
sandboxes.
I'm not really talking about the relative difficulty of granting
access. Yes, that's quick. Though a vo
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
I'd like to propose we make Barrie a committer. He has contributed a
lot of small patches, and recently seems to be the "does it work on
Windows?" watchdog. He in particular has done a lot with the assembly
plugin and has also dug into some of the components in Plexus to
Jason - any further thoughts on this?
On 18/12/2006, at 4:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 12/12/2006, at 5:08 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
So, in response to John's email: I think we need to settle on what
we're going to use and stop writing new tools. We have several
invokers, several verifier
Can anyone think of a use case other than the war plugin, or should
we just go with the pre-package phase?
On 18/12/2006, at 8:49 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 18/12/2006, at 7:02 PM, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
If you put it that way, then it sounds fine. Except it's not
generally appliccable,
Thoughts? Should we change the name?
On 18/12/2006, at 4:53 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
ping
On 14/12/2006, at 8:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I just noticed this guy:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/archetypes/maven-
archetype-plugin/
I don't recall this archetype being added (a
Joakim?
On 18/12/2006, at 4:39 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
ping
On 09/12/2006, at 11:26 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
What is the license on the .jj file?
On 09/12/2006, at 2:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: joakime
Date: Fri Dec 8 07:15:03 2006
New Revision: 484633
URL: http://svn.apache.
Fixed.
On 04/01/2007, at 4:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/surefire/trunk/surefire-
build-log-20070104.043136.txt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
I'd like to propose we make Barrie a committer. He has contributed a
lot of small patches, and recently seems to be the "does it work on
Windows?" watchdog. He in particular has done a lot with the assembly
plugin and has also dug into some of the components in Plexus to fix
things where ne
On 03/01/2007, at 4:29 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
I am not sure what you refer to by:
[snip]
The way Continuum is designed means
you get to a certain point where you want to save an object and
you find that you can't, or you aren't saving everything you want,
etc.
[/snip]
Could you please gi
The first time anyone fixes/changes anything in archiva, this will
start getting harder to keep in sync, so we should do it sooner
rather than later.
One question though - if it was based on Archiva why were all the
licenses removed?
- Brett
On 31/12/2006, at 7:31 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wro
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MAVENUPLOAD-1301JasperReports 1.3.0 upload
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1301
MAVENUPLOAD-1300JasperReports 1.2.8 upload
http://jir
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (41 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MEV-481 Wrong artifact name for groovy-sources in maven repo
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-481
MEV-480 geronimo-spec-* groupdid should be ge
Hi Erik,
I am playing around refactoring some store stuff using jdo and ibatis on
a separate branch (key-refactoring) and welcome any help i can get with
JDO :-). I am usually on #continuum on IRC (irc.codehaus.org), or happy
to join jpox lists.
Cheers,
Rahul
Erik Bengtson wrote:
Quoting
Why did you revert the license too?
I'd suggest replacing c:set with c:url to remove all the expressions
and avoid the problem in that entirely. I'd also suggest extracting
the fragment out into a separate file.
- Brett
On 04/01/2007, at 5:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: joakime
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out why Maven does not work well for Cocoon project
(see [1] and [2]). I think situation described in [1] is caused by
MNG-2302 bug. So i tried to use Maven 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT version (checked
out today) and it seems still to be buggy. This time Maven fails to
build whole P
oh, sorry - misread. Yes, I'll update the POM too - thx.
On 04/01/2007, at 12:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Yep, the description is right (though I narrowed it down to only
plugins, so I'll add that to the description).
- Brett
On 04/01/2007, at 12:38 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Cool, but could
Yep, the description is right (though I narrowed it down to only
plugins, so I'll add that to the description).
- Brett
On 04/01/2007, at 12:38 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Cool, but could you please keep the description in the POM for the
test updated with the description of what the test actu
Cool, but could you please keep the description in the POM for the
test updated with the description of what the test actually does.
That's where we tried to transfer what descriptions there were for
the tests we converted.
Thanks,
Jason.
On 3 Jan 07, at 8:28 AM 3 Jan 07, [EMAIL PROTECTE
+1
--
Regards,
Garvin LeClaire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/3/07, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
fabrizio
On 1/3/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to call a second vote to release maven-dependency-plugin
> 2.0-alpha-1.
Thanks everyone! I'm just happy to work with a diverse group of
competent people and be involved in project that I believe in. :-)
Regards,
John
On 1/3/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Welcome John.
All my congrats.
Arnaud
On 1/3/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I was planning to start debugging it myself. Clearly the assertion doesn't
provided enough debug info. I'll be on irc, if you can help me.
Roald Bankras
Software Engineer
JTeam b.v.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 1
well, for whats it worth I am pretty sure that if a developer ever
gets a reproducible way to get these failures it will be fixed...but
without any way to reproduce it then its tough to diagnose.
on that vein though, if someone with that kinda problem where to say,
hop on irc and make them selves
its not just jpox in continuum but also the jpox usage in the
plexus-security rbac and user management stores that joakim worked
through a couple of months back while consulting with you I think.
Joakim can explain more on that if he likes. I just remember that we
had a mess of issues in getting
Welcome John.
All my congrats.
Arnaud
On 1/3/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Congrats John!
Stéphane
On 1/3/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Maven PMC has voted to add John Tolentino to the PMC. Please
> join me in welcoming him!
>
> Cheers,
> Bret
Quoting Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> JDO is not bad, but JPOX has proven to be less then robust.
Sometime ago I joined this list to provide an easier a communication channel for
solving continuum/jpox issues and besides a few emails no one has ever
requested any help on issues neither gav
+1
fabrizio
On 1/3/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to call a second vote to release maven-dependency-plugin
2.0-alpha-1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
32 matches
Mail list logo
