Sorry to top reply, but my summarised response is:
- there are valid use cases for plugins in more than one repository
- Maven should always be using the repository with the newest version
available. If it's not, then it's a bug.
If you are using a version > the last release, and > the snapsh
On a related note, can the Plugin harness notes at the URL below be
updated for the recent updates to the harness and shared tools:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+Plugin+Harness
Thanks a ton in advance!
Rahul
- Original Message -
From: "Raphaël Piéroni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
ping
On 14/12/2006, at 8:29 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I just noticed this guy:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/archetypes/maven-
archetype-plugin/
I don't recall this archetype being added (and since they weren't
listed out in the vote never noticed). Isn't this name a bit
I heard the same objection from Wendy. Can we roll this change back?
/me needs to track his objections more carefully, noting this has
been released since.
- Brett
On 09/12/2006, at 11:25 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Why not? I think signing the metadata is just as important.
- Brett
On 09/12
I read through all these threads, and they kind of ran off into
entirely different tracks on alternate build systems and CM.
On Kenney's points in particular:
On 06/12/2006, at 12:41 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
I'm basically -0 on adding generate-package-resources/process-
package-resources
I think this got lost in the thread (I'm just rereading the whole
thing).
Anyway, my opinion is that if we need extension points in mojos, the
mojos should be turned into smaller tasks - they are doing too much
work.
- Brett
On 06/12/2006, at 8:04 AM, John Casey wrote:
Just going to chi
I observed this afternoon that:
source:jar and javadoc:jar
goals were failing when I attempted a release. The versions in questions
were 2.0.2 and 2.2 respectively.
Attaching the error below. Anyone else noticed this?
Rahul
this realm = plexus.core.maven
urls[0] = file:/D:/rnd/apps/maven-2
ping
On 09/12/2006, at 11:26 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
What is the license on the .jj file?
On 09/12/2006, at 2:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: joakime
Date: Fri Dec 8 07:15:03 2006
New Revision: 484633
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=484633
Log:
Some uncommmited work
Late response, but probably worth answering...
I generally like this idea (and it is the default behaviour, I think)
- but I think it would be too constrictive to most users.
Is that a fair analysis?
- Brett
On 08/11/2006, at 7:54 AM, John Allen wrote:
This maybe moot but this reminds me o
On 12/12/2006, at 5:08 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
So, in response to John's email: I think we need to settle on what
we're going to use and stop writing new tools. We have several
invokers, several verifiers, several IT plugins, and the plugin
harness. It is simply out of control. We have di
On 18/12/2006, at 1:49 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
(btw mvn site takes about 4 minutes since it pings all snapshot
repos multiple
times for each artifact)
How recent is your 2.1 build? I thought I recently fixed that.
- Brett
Hi,
In a plugin i experiment with the testing harness.
I would like to know how to configure the remote repositories and settings
file.
The plugin should be run in a directory without a pom.xml file.
Regards,
Raphaël
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jason,
[cut]
>> thanks for your work. I tried to build my site with maven 2.0.4. and
>> maven-site-plugin 2.0-SNAPSHOT and now javadoc seems to work even if
>> the site is staged (site:stage). I do not know if that was intended by your
>> fix.
>>
On 17 Dec 06, at 1:58 PM 17 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
On 12/17/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fabrizio,
When the release is ready to be made can I actually perform the
release?
Sure, no problem for me. Btw I already used the new remote-resources
and gpg stuff to deploy
On 12/17/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fabrizio,
When the release is ready to be made can I actually perform the
release?
Sure, no problem for me. Btw I already used the new remote-resources
and gpg stuff to deploy 4 releases in maven shared and everything
worked well. The only
Fabrizio,
When the release is ready to be made can I actually perform the
release? I would like to keep testing the new tools and move toward
having the release be made by one machine. The more releases I can do
to test this the better. I will document everything (Joakim and I
have starte
+1
On 12/16/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dependencies used by the maven-eclipse-plugin have been released and a
stable revision for a vote has been set.
I'd like to restart a vote based on:
- svn rev. 487861
- snapshot deployed at
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-re
On 17 Dec 06, at 10:27 AM 17 Dec 06, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Yes - built from trunk. The jar includes it. But see below:
Now for some of the new classworlds magic! :-) Don't be frightened :-)
which is to be expected. Too bad this doesn't work, since all
reporting plugins are really
plug
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 17 Dec 06, at 9:49 AM 17 Dec 06, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Ok, I've tested with my schemadoc-maven-plugin
(svn://svn.neonics.com/m2-plugins/trunk/schemadoc-maven-plugin)
(after purging local repo and rebuilding plugin-tools and
plugin-plugin since I require qdox 1.6):
On 17 Dec 06, at 9:49 AM 17 Dec 06, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Ok, I've tested with my schemadoc-maven-plugin (svn://
svn.neonics.com/m2-plugins/trunk/schemadoc-maven-plugin)
(after purging local repo and rebuilding plugin-tools and plugin-
plugin since I require qdox 1.6):
I'm testing the Maven
Ok, I've tested with my schemadoc-maven-plugin
(svn://svn.neonics.com/m2-plugins/trunk/schemadoc-maven-plugin)
(after purging local repo and rebuilding plugin-tools and plugin-plugin since I
require qdox 1.6):
I'm testing the MavenMultiPage report - I'm assuming others are testing the
normal r
The maven-site-plugin should be good now.
Jason.
On 17 Dec 06, at 8:16 AM 17 Dec 06, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
Hi Jason,
In trunk, I'm finding 2 maven-site-plugin dirs: maven-site-plugin
and maven-site-plugin-with-compat-for-2.0.4
There are lots of changes between these two - almost all files
a
Hi Jason,
In trunk, I'm finding 2 maven-site-plugin dirs: maven-site-plugin
and maven-site-plugin-with-compat-for-2.0.4
There are lots of changes between these two - almost all files
are different (mostly license headers).
Which version is the right one? Which one will be merged to the other?
Sh
+1
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
+1
Stéphane
On 12/16/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dependencies used by the maven-eclipse-plugin have been released and a
stable revision for a vote has been set.
I'd like to restart a vote based on:
- svn rev. 487861
- snapshot deployed at
http:/
24 matches
Mail list logo
