Preparing for all the releases

Hi, Here is the result of a bunch of the work that's been done lately. This is what a typical release will look like: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/stage/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/1.0-SNAPSHOT/ So if anyone is interested, take

Re: A single groupId for Maven?

personally I like the nesting of a particular project under the groupId, like org.apache.maven.continuum... just unfortunate that maven was..well maven since org.apache.maven.maven would look rather goofy and its a bit late to change that :) what did you have in mind jason? pull things like con

Re: Add build source jar to org.apache.maven:maven-parent?

On 12/10/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 3:45 PM 9 Dec 06, Barrie Treloar wrote: > Can org.apache.maven:maven-parent:5 be created with a build section > that always generates a source jar? > Sure, I think that's a reasonable request. Do you really just what we do f

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-tree

+1 Vincent 2006/12/7, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I would like to get maven-dependency-tree out of SNAPSHOT mode. I'm proposing making it 1.0-alpha-1. Found at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-dependency-tree It is used by maven-project-info-reports-plugin (2.

Re: A single groupId for Maven?

If projects like Wagon and SCM will always be managed by the Maven project, then it makes sense to put them under org.apache.maven. If they are planned to eventuall become stand-alone projects, used outside of maven, it kind of makes more sense to me to keep the groupIds distinct as they are - if

Re: Add build source jar to org.apache.maven:maven-parent?

On 9 Dec 06, at 3:45 PM 9 Dec 06, Barrie Treloar wrote: Can org.apache.maven:maven-parent:5 be created with a build section that always generates a source jar? Sure, I think that's a reasonable request. Do you really just what we do for a normal release? JavaDoc JAR as well? Jason. It

Re: Maven and Fedora

On 9 Dec 06, at 3:40 PM 9 Dec 06, Bob Allison wrote: I have only been half following this thread so please excuse me if what I say is OT or repeats what someone else said. As the author of the RPM plugin, I think I can safely say that we could easily build RPMs of each Maven release (conta

Add build source jar to org.apache.maven:maven-parent?

Can org.apache.maven:maven-parent:5 be created with a build section that always generates a source jar? It is very frustrating trying to debug plugins (especially snapshots) that do not have source jars. Cheers Bae - To unsubsc

Re: Maven and Fedora

I have only been half following this thread so please excuse me if what I say is OT or repeats what someone else said. As the author of the RPM plugin, I think I can safely say that we could easily build RPMs of each Maven release (containing the same content as the tarball) that installs by d

Re: Maven2 JAXB 2.0 Plugin

On 9 Dec 06, at 2:15 PM 9 Dec 06, A. Alonso Dominguez wrote: Hi there, I would like to donate to maven a new plugin which I had developed for a project which needed it. The plugin name is "maven-jaxb-plugin" and it allows to maven generate Java classes from XML schemas and to generate XML

A single groupId for Maven?

Hi, Just looking at our proliferation of projects and that we have many groupIds and I'm wondering if we should be doing that and encouraging that? Should all our projects here have a groupId of org.apache.maven? Jason. -

Maven2 JAXB 2.0 Plugin

Hi there, I would like to donate to maven a new plugin which I had developed for a project which needed it. The plugin name is "maven-jaxb-plugin" and it allows to maven generate Java classes from XML schemas and to generate XML files from java packages. So it's a maven frontend for the Sun's to

Re: Maven and Fedora

On 9 Dec 06, at 11:06 AM 9 Dec 06, David Whitehurst wrote: I'm an AppFuse person that listens here and I agree wholeheartedly with Jason. All of the linux variations have a graphical file explorer and some unzip facility. You just do the following: Just for clarification I am not oppos

Re: Updating JIRA

On 9 Dec 06, at 11:37 AM 9 Dec 06, Jesse McConnell wrote: right, last time I brought this up the goal was to resolve all those for an actual 1.1 release.. If that's the case that's cool. I would like to see maybe an alpha-1 release in January perhaps followed up a beta or two once all the

Re: Updating JIRA

right, last time I brought this up the goal was to resolve all those for an actual 1.1 release.. I would like to see maybe an alpha-1 release in January perhaps followed up a beta or two once all the confirmed new features are in place (like profiles, etc). I think the decision had not be to act

Re: Maven and Fedora

I'm an AppFuse person that listens here and I agree wholeheartedly with Jason. All of the linux variations have a graphical file explorer and some unzip facility. You just do the following: - drag the tar.gz to where you're unzipping - ln -s /usr/local/maven-2.0.4 /usr/local/maven - set M2_HOME

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

I updated the parent POM in Wagon and deployed a snapshot that you can use until we do the final release. Jason. On 9 Dec 06, at 9:55 AM 9 Dec 06, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Jason, To fix MAVEN-1659

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 9 Dec 06, at 10:12 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: ok, thanks. Can you use a SNAPSHOT for now? Jason. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Jason, > > To fix MAVEN-1659

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 9 Dec 06, at 10:12 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: ok, thanks. Can you come into IRC so we can work through some of these issues? jason. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Jason, > > To fix MAVE

Updating JIRA

Hi, Is what's in JIRA representative of the next release? Just wanted to make sure that what's there actually gives users some idea of what's coming up. Also, I feel that the version should go back to alpha. Archiva is simply not even close to being beta software and misrepresents it's

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

ok, thanks. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Jason, > > To fix MAVEN-1659 we > need to > have the fix for WAGONHTTP-5 WAGONHT

Updating JIRA

Hi, If anything is thinking of doing a release of Continuum anytime soon can you please update Continuum's JIRA so that it's representative of what's going to be fixed for at least the next release like Kenney and I have done for Maven itself: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG I don't

Re: Maven 1.x Release Requirements

Ok, I update our homepage Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:34 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > http://repo1.maven.org/maven > or > http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven > > Lukas and Carlos mentioned the 2nd one. > Go with the repo1.m

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Jason, To fix MAVEN-1659 we need to have the fix for WAGONHTTP-5 . Is it possible to release wagon http 1.0-beta-2 ASAP ?* Yah, the 72 hou

Re: Maven 1.x Release Requirements

On 9 Dec 06, at 9:34 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: http://repo1.maven.org/maven or http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven Lukas and Carlos mentioned the 2nd one. Go with the repo1.maven.org/maven one as we have full control over that and can react immediately if there are prob

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Jason, To fix MAVEN-1659 we need to have the fix for WAGONHTTP-5 . Is it possible to release wagon http 1.0-beta-2 ASAP ?* *Arnaud* * On 12/9/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another thing

Re: Maven 1.x Release Requirements

http://repo1.maven.org/maven or http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven Lukas and Carlos mentioned the 2nd one. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 8:38 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Do you want that we add a news on the m1 homepage abou

Re: Maven 1.x Release Requirements

On 9 Dec 06, at 8:38 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Do you want that we add a news on the m1 homepage about the current problem with the central repository. To which central repository must invite our users to set the maven.repo.remote property ? http://repo1.maven.org/maven ? That wo

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-tree

On 9 Dec 06, at 6:54 AM 9 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: Hi Joakim, Daniel Kulp wrote: > 3) No LICENSE of NOTICE file in the resulting jar (may need to wait for > Jason's changes) On 12/7/06, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This has been corrected in subversion. [maven-depen

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-tree

On 9 Dec 06, at 6:54 AM 9 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote: Hi Joakim, Daniel Kulp wrote: > 3) No LICENSE of NOTICE file in the resulting jar (may need to wait for > Jason's changes) On 12/7/06, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This has been corrected in subversion. [maven-depen

Re: Maven 1.x Release Requirements

Do you want that we add a news on the m1 homepage about the current problem with the central repository. To which central repository must invite our users to set the maven.repo.remote property ? http://repo1.maven.org/maven ? Arnaud On 12/8/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8 Dec

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Another thing which can help us, is to help to setup somewhere a CI like continuum to build maven from the bootstrap. We'll gain a lot of time. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Arnaud Héritier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guys, I'm back. Sorry for the delay to reply to this emergency. As you cer

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

The artifact plugin for the PomRewriter uses directly the maven-model [1] :-( *import* org.apache.maven.project.io.dom4j.MavenDom4jReader; *import* org.apache.maven.project.io.dom4j.MavenDom4jWriter; It's bad and very annoying to keep the compatibility with a given version of the core ... Arna

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Ok, i'll try the STAX-RI this week end and give you a feedback. If it seems to work I'll publish a snapshot to allow our users to test it. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 09/12/2006, at 12:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > MAVEN-1755 Backward Incompability :

Re: [vote] release maven-dependency-tree

Hi Joakim, Daniel Kulp wrote: > 3) No LICENSE of NOTICE file in the resulting jar (may need to wait for > Jason's changes) On 12/7/06, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This has been corrected in subversion. [maven-dependency-tree]$ mvn -PsharedResources clean package I see that now

Re: Maven and Fedora

Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >1. Get rpm from jpackage. Check if it is set to build natively. > If not, > Build it, run it through spec-gcj-convert (file attached), verify > new spec, rebuild it, make sure it conforms to Fedora guidelines > for everything except the rel