Re: integration tests: how to handle versions and external oddities?

2006-10-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Oct 06, at 2:24 PM 30 Oct 06, Brett Porter wrote: This is really a question for the users list, but since we're here these are probably the alternatives you have: - use profiles to distringuish which tests run when (by reconfiguring the surefire plugin) - using testng with groups to c

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-30 Thread Nathan Beyer
It's fixed now. I am viewing it on a wee laptop screen. :( -Nathan On 10/30/06, Eric Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Cool. I was just about to do that after figuring out it only happened with giant text size. Thanks; Eric On 10/30/06, Will L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, I confirm

Plugin execution ordering within a phase

2006-10-30 Thread Brian Topping
Greetings, I'm having a problem using assembly plugin to create a work directory for another plugin (the debian plugin). I started off by putting these plugins in different phases to force the order, but as the project has evolved, this has become unworkable because there are no open pha

Re: svn commit: r467331 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsTest

2006-10-30 Thread Carlos Sanchez
parent pom can't change in it's basic "build required" info (eg. dependencies), but we can add more info like license, url,... it's better to centralize it than have it copied all over On 10/30/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/30/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: svn commit: r467331 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsTest

2006-10-30 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
On 10/30/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There are a lot of common things to all eclipse projects like license. Having the license all over all projects is not easy fo fix, change,... Same problem for all common info but given the actual repository policy, also the parent pom can

Re: [sandbox-openpgp] does maven really already use openpgp ?

2006-10-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 31/10/2006, at 7:29 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello Brett, I am surprised by the concept of making a listener write the signature. Since the listener is working (I believe) on the build machine end and not on the repository end, there must be a mechanism to add the signature fi

project group shortcuts

2006-10-30 Thread Jesse McConnell
last week I mentioned this in rahul's zero-conf mail if this is really what we want to change here then perhaps we ought to make it an option for configuration of the project group in all cases, the ability to specify the name of the project group...or give it some kinda short identification ele

Re: svn commit: r468338 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/writers/EclipseOSGiManifestWriter.java

2006-10-30 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I think it needs to be shared and keep eclipse plugin with only eclipse specifics as much as possible. On 10/27/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: carlos > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468338 > Lo

Re: svn commit: r467331 - in /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-eclipse-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsMojo.java test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/eclipse/MakeArtifactsTest

2006-10-30 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On 10/28/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > On 10/24/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what is the benefit of having a parent pom? I would prefer keeping > > poms self-contained, an empty parent seems useless at the moment (all > > the values comes from th

Re: [sandbox-openpgp] does maven really already use openpgp ?

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Brett, I am surprised by the concept of making a listener write the signature. Since the listener is working (I believe) on the build machine end and not on the repository end, there must be a mechanism to add the signature files to the list of files to transfer ? Does the listener "know"

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-30 Thread Eric Redmond
Cool. I was just about to do that after figuring out it only happened with giant text size. Thanks; Eric On 10/30/06, Will L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I confirm the same problem with FireFox 1.5.0.7 and IE 7. I think this problem has to with using "div". The behavior of floating div se

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-30 Thread Edwin Punzalan
This is good. Great work. ^_^ Eric Redmond wrote: Interesting. I'll do it. On 10/29/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone interested in this? Begin forwarded message: > From: "Will Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 26 October 2006 2:10:53 PM > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAI

Re: [sandbox-openpgp] does maven really already use openpgp ?

2006-10-30 Thread Brett Porter
I think it was true when I wrote it, but without proper integration I didn't commit the changes to trunk as it would have been too disruptive. Still, wagon-openpgp does exist and between that and commons-openpgp that's most of the work. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/wagon/trunk/wago

Re: integration tests: how to handle versions and external oddities?

2006-10-30 Thread Brett Porter
This is really a question for the users list, but since we're here these are probably the alternatives you have: - use profiles to distringuish which tests run when (by reconfiguring the surefire plugin) - using testng with groups to categorise the tests - using a system property to enable/dis

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-30 Thread Will L
Yes, I confirm the same problem with FireFox 1.5.0.7 and IE 7. I think this problem has to with using "div". The behavior of floating div seems to be error prone. On the maven homepage, for example, http://maven.apache.org/ try shrinking the width of browser to very small, on my FF and IE7 the d

RE: integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-30 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 on testng. It would have the side benefit that we have better integration with that tool by nature of using it in Maven itself. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 7:54 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: integration tes

[sandbox-openpgp] does maven really already use openpgp ?

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I just read this on the web site of openpgp : http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/openpgp/ "Currently, Maven uses it in its development version to sign libraries released to the repository." Is this true ? Is there a mojo which does it ? In which codebase is this mojo ? Regards, An

Re: [discuss] Writing WebWork actions

2006-10-30 Thread Andrew Williams
I personally agree with the one class for CRUD. The reason I have for this is that if you use ModelDriven and the Verifiable (Or whatever - I forget the exact names) it saves much duplication of time. Readability and testing I have found easier under this approach too. Also it is worth noting

Re: Test failure in continuum-release

2006-10-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 10/30/06, Philippe Faes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Looks like the path to work-dir gets messed up. I'll give it a try on a cygwin machine tomorrow. Today I have a deadline. Are any other cygwin users getting the same problem? Wendy, can you add your comments to CONTINUUM-968? Done, though I

Re: integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-30 Thread John Casey
Would it make sense to create a list of tests for each version, and have the verifier/test plugin only run the ones on that test? It would be sort of like the old integration-tests.txt file, except the particular file might be selected using the Maven version being used? This way, the tests remain

Re: Serena/PVCS support

2006-10-30 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Thanks Peter. I'll look at it asap and add it in sandbox. Emmanuel Peter Ineson a écrit : Hi Emmanuel, I have now completed and added an attachment to issue 34 (attachment 1 - 109kb) http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-34 There is functionality just to perform checkouts, I believe that it

Re: integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Oct 06, at 3:12 AM 30 Oct 06, Brett Porter wrote: I was thinking that as well, wrt testng. It would be really good to establish some dependencies so that tests that are bound to fail could just be skipped if an earlier one fails. Also, the groups would be useful to run artifact relate

Re: integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Oct 06, at 2:33 AM 30 Oct 06, Dan Fabulich wrote: Jason and I had discussed this briefly a while ago... In my opinion, the best/clearest way to handle this is to branch the integration tests. Yes, we had the discussion but I don't agree that branching them is the best idea. I thin

Re: integration tests: how to handle versions and external oddities?

2006-10-30 Thread Aaron . Digulla
How do you handle the case of tests which don't have to or should be run every time? In my case, I have tests which check external connectivity which means that other systems have to be up and running (and correctly configured) or the test will fail. Currently, I'm using exclude rules and run t

[ANN] Maven Simian Plugin 1.6.1 for Maven 1.x released

2006-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
We are pleased to announce the Maven Simian Plugin 1.6.1 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/simian/ Simian Plugin for Maven === Changes in this version include: Fixed bugs: o plugin:deregister does

Re: integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-30 Thread Brett Porter
I was thinking that as well, wrt testng. It would be really good to establish some dependencies so that tests that are bound to fail could just be skipped if an earlier one fails. Also, the groups would be useful to run artifact related tests together, etc. I'm not sure about branching the

[ANN] Maven POM Plugin 1.5.1 for Maven 1.x released

2006-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
We are pleased to announce the Maven POM Plugin 1.5.1 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/pom/ Basic validation and updating mechanisms for your Project Object Model. === Changes in this version include

[ANN] Maven JIRA Plugin 1.3.1 for Maven 1.x released

2006-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
We are pleased to announce the Maven JIRA Plugin 1.3.1 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/jira/ This plugin downloads issues from Jira and creates a report. === Changes in this version include: Fixe

[ANN] Maven Java Plugin 1.6.1 for Maven 1.x released

2006-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
We are pleased to announce the Maven Java Plugin 1.6.1 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/java/ === Changes in this version include: Fixed bugs: o Java report fails build if no source files present.

[ANN] Maven Genapp Plugin 2.3.1 for Maven 1.x released

2006-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
We are pleased to announce the Maven Genapp Plugin 2.3.1 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/genapp/ A collection of example projects showing how to use maven in different situations === Changes in thi

[ANN] Maven Clover Plugin 1.11.1 for Maven 1.x released

2006-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
We are pleased to announce the Maven Clover Plugin 1.11.1 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/clover/ The Clover plugin allows measuring test coverage using Clover (http://www.cenqua.com/clover). === C

[ANN] Maven Changes Plugin 1.7 for Maven 1.x released

2006-10-30 Thread Lukas Theussl
We are pleased to announce the Maven Changes Plugin 1.7 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/changes/ === Changes in this version include: New Features: o New property maven.changes.outputencoding.

RE: integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-30 Thread Dan Fabulich
I should also mention that TestNG has some handy facilities to handle marking tests as "skipped" based on fancy criteria... I still think branching the tests is the cleanest way to handle this, but running integration tests in TestNG is a good fit regardless. -Dan > -Original Message- >