Re: Test failure in continuum-release

2006-10-29 Thread Philippe Faes
Looks like the path to work-dir gets messed up. I'll give it a try on a cygwin machine tomorrow. Today I have a deadline. Are any other cygwin users getting the same problem? Wendy, can you add your comments to CONTINUUM-968? grtz Philippe On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 09:06 -0700, Wendy Smoak wrote: >

RE: integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-29 Thread Dan Fabulich
Jason and I had discussed this briefly a while ago... In my opinion, the best/clearest way to handle this is to branch the integration tests. -Dan > -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 4:24 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Su

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Eric Redmond
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2641 On 10/29/06, Eric Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done. I'll make a patch to link to this in the Maven site later tongiht. http://www.nabble.com/Maven-f177.html Eric On 10/29/06, Eric Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Interesting. I'll do it.

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Eric Redmond
I'm running FF2 and see no issue. What OS are you running? I tested it in FF2/WinXP, IE6/WinXP, and FF1.5/Linux. Luckly, it's editable by anyone like a wiki. If you can fix it against your browser, please make the necessary changes: http://www.nabble.com/catalog/EditForum.jtp?rev=20684 Jason/Br

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Wayne Fay
This is excellent! I might even try using it a bit instead of GMail all the time... ;-) Wayne On 10/29/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ya, this is cool... was it easy to do? I'd like to do the same for the Geronimo forums :-) --jason On Oct 29, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Brett Porter wro

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Jason Dillon
Ya, this is cool... was it easy to do? I'd like to do the same for the Geronimo forums :-) --jason On Oct 29, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Cool! Can you document what was involved? We'll need to make sure we're able to keep this up to date as we change the navigation. - Brett

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
Cool! Can you document what was involved? We'll need to make sure we're able to keep this up to date as we change the navigation. - Brett On 30/10/2006, at 12:26 PM, Eric Redmond wrote: Done. I'll make a patch to link to this in the Maven site later tongiht. http://www.nabble.com/Maven-

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Nathan Beyer
The site looks a little crazy in Firefox 2, at least for me. The Maven navigation menu on the left is intermixed with the Nabble page. It looks like the Nabble page isn't being justified against menu correctly. -Nathan On 10/29/06, Eric Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done. I'll make a patch

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Eric Redmond
Done. I'll make a patch to link to this in the Maven site later tongiht. http://www.nabble.com/Maven-f177.html Eric On 10/29/06, Eric Redmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Interesting. I'll do it. On 10/29/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone interested in this? > > Begin forw

integration tests: how to handle versions?

2006-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I like the new integration testing method. However, I've just added a test that will only work with a version of Maven that fixes the bug (which I have sorted out locally, just doing some other checks before committing). So the two things we need to do: - exclude that test from Maven

Re: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Eric Redmond
Interesting. I'll do it. On 10/29/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone interested in this? Begin forwarded message: > From: "Will Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 26 October 2006 2:10:53 PM > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Maven on Nabble > Message-Id: >

[discuss] Archiva Logo

2006-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, We've had some logo proposals done up for Archiva that is consistent with the Maven and Continuum logos. 4 proposals here: http://people.apache.org/~brett/archiva_logo.gif (the final logo wouldn't have the background shading). I won't start a vote just now - I'd just like to give this a

Fwd: Maven on Nabble

2006-10-29 Thread Brett Porter
Anyone interested in this? Begin forwarded message: From: "Will Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 26 October 2006 2:10:53 PM To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Maven on Nabble Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, Brett, This is Will from the Nabble project. We emailed several

RE: Mojo testing w/ the verifier

2006-10-29 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'm having similar issues in the maven-dependency-plugin but I opted to create empty and non-empty artifacts as needed on the fly. I use the plugin harness to implement the Mojo but then I inject various things like the ArtifactHandler and ArtifactResolvers / Repos etc as nessessary to make it w

Mojo testing w/ the verifier

2006-10-29 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Hi, I am trying to use the new testing techniques Jason introduced for the ITs (namely the Verifier). It's running fine and it fixes the classloader issues I had with the embedder. The Ear plugin needs fake artifacts (mainly ejbs, wars, sars, etc) so I have a fake local repository in my test/res

Re: Mojo testing w/ the verifier

2006-10-29 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Fabrizio, On 10/29/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Stéphane, Actually, the eclipse plugin already has this problem.. Yeah, I know that. I just meant I was not the only one using a fake local repository. I still couldn't find a good way to fix those problems, but it's so

Re: Mojo testing w/ the verifier

2006-10-29 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
Hi Stéphane, On 10/29/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Every time the target directory is cleaned, the tests downloads a lot of stuff maven depends on. This is really a waste of time and bandwidth. .. For the second one, I think we need a clean solution for this use case. The E