Hi Dennis,
Could you please update the http://maven.apache.org/plugins/ page?
Thanks!
Vincent
2006/10/24, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven DOCCK
Plugin, version 1.0-beta-1
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-docck-plugin/
Anything is up for discussion, of course...but I just wanted to mention that
changing the syntax of the POM will have to wait until Maven 2.1 at the
soonest.
Sorry to rain on the parade.
-j
On 10/24/06, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Can we have an element like:
Hi,
Can we have an element like:
true
in the pom.xml where the notifiers are being setup defaulting it to
'false' if none is defined. A value of 'true' implies the notifier is a
ProjectGroup notifier and all child modules inherit it, 'false' that the
notifier is project l
On Oct 24, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
I don't think I understand the details of what you're proposing here,
but it sounds like you're thinking that the "foo" organization
would set
up maven.foo.org, and that Maven would automatically fall back to
checking maven.foo.org if the cen
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven DOCCK
Plugin, version 1.0-beta-1
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-docck-plugin/
You can run mvn -U to get the latest version of the plugin, or specify
the version in your project's plugin configuration:
org.apache.maven.plugi
Comments below
Brian Topping wrote:
> 2) Authenticity of artifacts is validated by control of DNS. The
> current method of getting an artifact into the central repository
> isn't scalable. If you know someone well enough, they put your code
> into the repository. If you don't know someone, your
Then I think s'cool.
Christian.
Jesse McConnell wrote:
> yes, correct
>
> the P4 notifiers would be applied to P4-P5-P6
>
> jesse
>
> On 10/24/06, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hmm. Even though the "below the watermark" notifiers are attached "per
>> project", I still thi
On 24 Oct 06, at 3:18 PM 24 Oct 06, Brian Topping wrote:
With the snapshots repo down, there was some discussion on IRC.
Joakim mentioned there was some discussion of a resolution that was
"DNS-like, not actual DNS" and it got me thinking DNS might be a
better solution (possibly with RFC
If you use DNS for fault-tolerance, if one repo goes down, it may take
upwards of 15 minutes for the client side DNS cache to clear and use
the new IP: this may be acceptable, depending on your requirements. A
more reliable approach would be to use a load balancer to ping the
distributed caches an
Aaron,
This is a great cvs reporting plug-in you've started for maven2, have you
been succesful and would you be putting it for public use.
thanks,
-barry
Aaron.Digulla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I made some further progress.
>
> Apparently, the problem is in Sun's SAXParserFactory which stores a
yes, correct
the P4 notifiers would be applied to P4-P5-P6
jesse
On 10/24/06, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm. Even though the "below the watermark" notifiers are attached "per
project", I still think that notifiers defined in intermediary parents
should be applied to e
Hmm. Even though the "below the watermark" notifiers are attached "per
project", I still think that notifiers defined in intermediary parents
should be applied to each child project. True?
Christian
Christian Edward Gruber wrote:
> The above/below scheme makes sense to me.
>
> Christian.
>
> Je
With the snapshots repo down, there was some discussion on IRC.
Joakim mentioned there was some discussion of a resolution that was
"DNS-like, not actual DNS" and it got me thinking DNS might be a
better solution (possibly with RFC-2782 extensions) to resolve
repositories. Apologies if t
The above/below scheme makes sense to me.
Christian.
Jesse McConnell wrote:
>>
>> My only slight reservation would be if group-level notifiers can act
>> differently than project-level notifiers. If that's the case, then the
>> behavior of Continuum builds will differ based on which POM is used
>
On 10/24/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/24/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on deploying parent and all plugins to central repository.
wow, that's great :)
just a question/decision to take before going on, anyway: at the
moment eclipse poms use
On 10/24/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on deploying parent and all plugins to central repository.
wow, that's great :)
just a question/decision to take before going on, anyway: at the
moment eclipse poms uses "eclipse-plugin" as packaging. I was thinking
to convert
How is the move of people.apache.org going?
I received a few ping answers this night, but it's been non-responsive
today - the maintaince-period was scheduled to be over on monday?
--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
--
I'm working on deploying parent and all plugins to central repository.
On 10/24/06, Fabrizio Giustina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Carlos,
On 10/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: carlos
> Date: Tue Oct 24 06:36:54 2006
> New Revision: 467331
>
> URL: http://svn.apac
Hi Carlos,
On 10/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: carlos
Date: Tue Oct 24 06:36:54 2006
New Revision: 467331
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=467331
Log: > Use smaller groups and a parent pom for eclipse projects
what is the benefit of having a parent
Typo "maven-core" should be "maven-cli"
Page: http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-building-m2.html
Section: Building Maven with Maven Installed
[[ currently ]]
This will build, test and install all libraries in the local
repository. Next, if you want to produce the binary distributi
On 24 Oct 06, at 6:13 AM 24 Oct 06, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I have a parent POM, containing the master version number for many
subprojects.
The element, being optional, is left out, and subprojects
inherit the version from the parent.
In the subprojects however, the parent tag is mand
On 23 Oct 06, at 10:20 PM 23 Oct 06, Ralph Goers wrote:
John,
I've not looked at the Plexus code, but it reminds me a bit of Avalon.
The first version of Plexus was an Avalon container and it still has
an Avalon personality i.e. you can run Avalon component in Plexus.
It seems like what
Hi all,
I have a parent POM, containing the master version number for many
subprojects.
The element, being optional, is left out, and subprojects
inherit the version from the parent.
In the subprojects however, the parent tag is mandatory. And despite a
relativePath tag being present pointing b
23 matches
Mail list logo
