Re: Publishing Apache projects to central repo

2006-09-18 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Nathan Beyer wrote: I'm trying to help out the Xerces and XML Commons project to produce some POMs and publish some newly release JARs to the central repository. Should I just go about this as described here [1] and post a JIRA issue or is there a more streamlined approach that Apache projects c

Re: htmlparser

2006-09-18 Thread Carlos Sanchez
if you use maven 2 it's just a matter of deploying to sf machines throught ssh. On 9/18/06, Derrick Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have a project that could be published to your repo - http://htmlparser.org. The FAQ says if I make a Maven 2 style repository and make it available over

Re: version selection

2006-09-18 Thread Ralph Goers
Mike, I'm in the process of creating unit tests for the patch - which is a good thing because the patch doesn't seem to be working quite the way it needs to in all cases. Hopefully I'll have this done in the next couple of days. Ralph Mike Perham wrote: That's too bad. I think deps at th

Please sync Apache m2 repository for MyFaces

2006-09-18 Thread Wendy Smoak
MyFaces Core 1.1.4 has been deployed to m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository. Please sync it to the central Maven repo when you have a chance. Vote thread: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MyFaces-Core-1.1.4-t2253192.html Thanks, Wendy Smoak -

Re: htmlparser

2006-09-18 Thread Shane Isbell
To use your sf project web page for downloads, you would need to submit a support request to sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4297&group_id=1#acceptable_use Shane On 9/18/06, Derrick Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have a project that could be publish

Re: svn commit: r441469 - in /maven/continuum/branches/release-integration/maven/maven-release-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/ main/resources/META-INF/plexus/ test/resources/or

2006-09-18 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I'll fix this asap. Thanks. Brett Porter wrote: On 08/09/2006, at 8:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: epunzalan Date: Fri Sep 8 03:50:09 2006 New Revision: 441469 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=441469 Log: PR: CONTINUUM-727 +private final int phaseSkip = 0, pha

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Yup it works now but I remember it took me a lot of time to make it happen. On 9/18/06, David J. M. Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alexandre Poitras wrote: > I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I > can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filena

htmlparser

2006-09-18 Thread Derrick Oswald
Hi, I have a project that could be published to your repo - http://htmlparser.org. The FAQ says if I make a Maven 2 style repository and make it available over rsync, you can publish it to ibiblio. I'm not sure how to do that. The apparently useful sourceforge-plugin is only Maven 1. Is rsync pu

Publishing Apache projects to central repo

2006-09-18 Thread Nathan Beyer
I'm trying to help out the Xerces and XML Commons project to produce some POMs and publish some newly release JARs to the central repository. Should I just go about this as described here [1] and post a JIRA issue or is there a more streamlined approach that Apache projects can integrate with to do

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread David J. M. Karlsen
Alexandre Poitras wrote: I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the J

Migration from JUnit 3 to JUnit 4

2006-09-18 Thread Tomasz Błachowicz
Hi, I was wondering about migrating default archetype dependency from JUnit 3 to JUnit 4. I had a quick look at maven-archetype-quickstart and maven-archetype-webapp that are most commonly used across users, I believe. Both of these depend on JUnit 3.8.1. Whyt about migration to JUnit 4 or even 4

Re: API proposal for discussion: issue management API and project manage

2006-09-18 Thread Jimisola Laursen
Hi Brett, Thank you for your reply - me and Tomasz Pik will keep those things in mind . I was actually hoping for a somewhat greater response on this proposal. Hopefully that will come when there is something more substansial. Regards, Jimisola brettporter wrote: > > > On 11/09/2006, at 3:0

Re: where to put common code was: [jira] Created: (MRELEASE-162) Move all release core code in maven/shared

2006-09-18 Thread John Casey
[] separate plugin and component code (like surefire) [ x ] multi-module build of both plugin and components, located in a "subproject" (like SCM) [ ] multi-module build of both plugin and components, located in the plugins directory [ ] one big plugin jar (like the release plugin now), wh

Re: version selection

2006-09-18 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mike Perham wrote: > That's too bad. I think deps at the same level should pick the > greater, not randomly. MNG-1577 would help a lot here. > > I'm also finding that exclusions are insideous - I can't see where an > exclusion is coming from so I can't determine which module is > erroneously ex

Re: where to put common code was: [jira] Created: (MRELEASE-162) Move all release core code in maven/shared

2006-09-18 Thread dan tran
[] separate plugin and component code (like surefire) [ x ] multi-module build of both plugin and components, located in a "subproject" (like SCM) [ ] multi-module build of both plugin and components, located in the plugins directory [ ] one big plugin jar (like the release plugin now), wh

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Oh sorry I was sure it was when you have a timestamp in your filename. Maybe I should test it again. Anyway, I just think there should a big note on the web site about this issue somewhere until the new version is released because it's really confusing at first. I spent a lot of time figuring out

Re: version selection

2006-09-18 Thread Mike Perham
That's too bad. I think deps at the same level should pick the greater, not randomly. MNG-1577 would help a lot here. I'm also finding that exclusions are insideous - I can't see where an exclusion is coming from so I can't determine which module is erroneously excluding a dep I need. On 9/18/

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread Brett Porter
That's the opposite to what you keep saying. It's when you *don't* have a timestamp in the version number. I could have sworn John fixed this recently, though... On 19/09/2006, at 1:16 AM, Alexandre Poitras wrote: That's the real one : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908 On 9/18/06, Al

Re: version selection

2006-09-18 Thread Brett Porter
It doesn't pick randomly, it picks based on nearest, which is undefined if there are two at the same level. However, this was mucked with in 2.0.4 and seemed to get a bit worse. I originally had it set to greater and there was much confusion because you couldn't always see where the version

Re: repository location for maven-model-v3

2006-09-18 Thread Brett Porter
check out maven/components/trunk (or a tag) cd maven-model mvn -P all-models package - Brett On 19/09/2006, at 1:54 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote: On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 18:36 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote: Hi, Can someone please tell me where the maven-model-v3 source repository is located? I looked

Re: repository location for maven-model-v3

2006-09-18 Thread Deepak Bhole
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 18:36 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please tell me where the maven-model-v3 source repository is > located? I looked around the maven repo but have been unable to find > it :( > > Thanks, > Deepak > *bump* Sorry to bump this one... just wanted to give i

version selection

2006-09-18 Thread Mike Perham
We constantly have version selection problems where Maven's random version selection bites us. This would almost always be solved if Maven would select the greater of the two versions. Why doesn't Maven do this instead of picking randomly? ---

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread Alexandre Poitras
That's the real one : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1908 On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oops wrong one, forget the last email. On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the issue I am speaking about : > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Oops wrong one, forget the last email. On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's the issue I am speaking about : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289 On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know t

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Here's the issue I am speaking about : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289 On 9/18/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename or I won't get the last

Re: [RANT] Maven is both heaven and hell

2006-09-18 Thread Alexandre Poitras
I think this is the issue I was referring too. I just know that I can't use a snapshot dependency that has a timestamp in its filename or I won't get the last version. I remember Brett couple of months ago saying this feature wasn't implemented yet. I'll try to find the JIRA issue. This is defini

Re: problem with differing versions of maven-model

2006-09-18 Thread fogwolf
yep - you are right. thanks! brettporter wrote: > > Actually, maven-model-3.0.1 has a different groupId I believe, and > belongs to Maven 1.x. You're probably looking for maven-model-2.0.4 > > On 15/09/2006, at 3:35 AM, fogwolf wrote: > >> >> Hi. >> >> I'm working on a Maven Java Plugin &

Re: svn commit: r441469 - in /maven/continuum/branches/release-integration/maven/maven-release-plugin/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/ main/resources/META-INF/plexus/ test/resources/or

2006-09-18 Thread Brett Porter
On 08/09/2006, at 8:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: epunzalan Date: Fri Sep 8 03:50:09 2006 New Revision: 441469 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=441469 Log: PR: CONTINUUM-727 +private final int phaseSkip = 0, phaseStart = 1, phaseEnd = 2, goalStart = 11, goalEnd =

Geronimo 1.1.1 released...please rsync M2 repos

2006-09-18 Thread Matt Hogstrom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have released Geronimo 1.1.1 and updated the m1 and m2 ibiblio repos. Can you rsync these if they are not done automagically? Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFDqIry66+OaRsTK

Re: svn commit: r447290 - /maven/continuum/branches/release-integration/continuum/continuum-webapp/src/main/webapp/

2006-09-18 Thread Brett Porter
You committed an empty file: On 18/09/2006, at 4:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maven/continuum/branches/release-integration/continuum/continuum- webapp/src/main/webapp/releaseResult.jsp

Review of maven-release-plugin documentation

2006-09-18 Thread John Tolentino
maven-release-plugin documentation is now ready for review. Staging site can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jtolentino/maven-release-plugin/ jira issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-141 Thanks, John Tolentino --