Unless anyone else changes their vote to archivarius, I'm going to count
this as a vote for Archiva :)
- Brett
On 13/08/2006 5:25 AM, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
As long as we're making up names:
[+1] Archivarius ;)
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 9 Aug 06, at 7:57 PM 9 Aug 06, Brett Porter wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk/src/site/resources/developers/maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml
On 13/08/2006 2:11 AM, Franz Allan Valencia See wrote:
Good day to you, Brett,
So the maven-eclipse-codestyle is not yet update? Is there a JIRA
issue for this? I'd like to watch it so tha
As long as we're making up names:
[+1] Archivarius ;)
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 9 Aug 06, at 7:57 PM 9 Aug 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote for one of the following names:
[ ] Archiva
+1
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fixed, thanks
On 8/12/06, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 13:56 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: carlos
> Date: Mon Aug 7 06:56:43 2006
> New Revision: 429342
[snip]
> +setContinuum( (Continuum) lookup(
"org.apache.maven.continuum.Continuum"
BTW the checkstyle plugin is already configured in maven-parent 3
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/maven-parent/3/maven-parent-3.pom
If you see the checkstyle report you can find the errors.
On 8/12/06, Franz Allan Valencia See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good day to you, Brett,
S
On 9 Aug 06, at 7:57 PM 9 Aug 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Please vote for one of the following names:
[ ] Archiva
+1
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
+1 for Arhiva
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good day to you, Brett,
So the maven-eclipse-codestyle is not yet update? Is there a JIRA
issue for this? I'd like to watch it so that I can be updated when the
new version would be released. I'm planning of reformatting the
existing codes (at least for the plugins) so that it would comply with
m
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 09:57 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Please vote for one of the following names:
>
> [ ] Archiva
+1
--
Trygve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it means from the components root
On 12/08/2006 10:07 PM, berndq wrote:
Hi,
looking at
http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-building-m2.html
ist says you can
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/trunks maven
and then
mvn install
from root, but there is no pom in ro
I've downloaded continuum 1.3 and collected some errors from the first startup.
If they are expected, IMO they should not be printed to the logs, unless DEBUG
is enabled.
I must say the first startup takes very long. Please let me know where I can
help.
1-
Brett,
Additionally surefire's POJO approach collides with junit4.
This is taken care of by the surefire plugin. It should select JUnit 4
as long as a it is in the dependency classpath.
The surefire plugin does not take care of that, it just adds a
JUnitDirectoryTestSuite to surefireBoote
Brettm
I have an updated one for Eclipse 3.2 which can finally handle the same
stuff IDEA could, I'll upload it soon.
upload to the website? will you add an eclipse 3.2 section?
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
looking at http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-building-m2.html
ist says you can
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/trunks maven
and then
mvn install
from root, but there is no pom in root?
Is there some information missing?
thanks
Bernd
Hi all,
As Wendy said, it would be good to track progress under SUREFIRE-31.
Is SUREFIRE-31 related to maven1?
and MSUREFIRE-84 related to maven2?
I assume
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-surefire-plugin
is the maven2 surefire plugin, so shouldn't we track progres
I have an updated one for Eclipse 3.2 which can finally handle the same
stuff IDEA could, I'll upload it soon.
Formatting is good, but the more important thing is not changing the
formatting of code you haven't added/changed.
Thanks,
Brett
On 12/08/2006 8:24 PM, berndq wrote:
Hi all,
shoul
Hi all,
should http://maven.apache.org/developers/maven-eclipse-codestyle.xml
be used?
looking at e.g. SurefirePlugin, it looks like this is not formatted
with the above code style.
In case I would suggest a patch, should the code be reformatted before
creating the patch?
Bernd
--
Please ask such questions on the user list!
AFAIK, there is no .har plugin for m1 but it's not really difficult to
build one (based on current plugins for other artifact's types). If
you need help on this, let us know.
Stéphane
On 8/12/06, neeraj bisht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all
18 matches
Mail list logo