On 8/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is definitely a good idea, to go along with the current information
on mirrors. Do you want to create a jira for it?
Sure, what one more JIRA entry :)
I'm not sure which project to lodge it in.
Suggestions?
-
Anyone?
On 1/08/2006 7:23 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I started fiddling with commons-openpgp in December (and others have
been meaning to do more in general since about 2004, as you'll see on
the wiki), so I've started putting together a repository security
proposal for Maven 2.1.
http://
Ok, to sum up what happened here:
- we can't do it in Maven until we have better external tools support
(so, maybe for 2.1, but any significant work in JDK 5 should probably be
held until 2.2)
- Continuum forks all builds, so it should be fine, but I think it is
worth waiting until profiles are
Is anyone working on it?
On 26/07/2006 9:58 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, jerome lacoste wrote:
What's the plan to fix this?
In maven-project/.../ProjectSorter.java the reports are added to the DAG.
It's easily fixed by removing that code (block at li
I guess we don't have any jdeveloper users out there. Should we bring it
into the Maven sandbox as something available for interested parties to
pick up and run with if they later come along?
- Brett
On 28/06/2006 12:53 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
This seems an ideal opportunity to do that.
John
I commented on the wiki. Everything looked good to me, but I wanted more
specifics on the dev and deployment platforms and jdks.
- Brett
On 5/08/2006 8:44 AM, John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been talking with quite a few people in back channels about putting
together a survey for the Mave
So... not much response on this.
We separated notifications from commits because of the theory that some
non-committers might want the commits and not the notifications, and I
could understand that some committers might monitor SVN via things other
than the list so would only be on notificatio
The tests should use Os in plexus utils to check that the family is unix.
- Brett
On 4/08/2006 1:12 PM, Edwin Punzalan wrote:
With regards to this, I tried fixing the Maven Assembly Plugin test
failures... but I need a SNAPSHOT of file-management in maven-shared
which is not deployed yet.
On 10 Aug 06, at 12:18 AM 10 Aug 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Currently, v2 of the parent does not have the correct paths to upload
to, but v3 includes the CPD check which is breaking at least the Maven
build and the IDEA plugin.
I would like to propose that we release v4 which is a stable bas
Hi Simon,
Catching up on mail to this list. The assessment for the isolated
classloader sounds correct, so a patch would be good. I think the
bootstrap classloader needs to be changed to be the same as the surefire
one, as its the latter that has evolved. I'm not sure the bootstrap even
needs
thanks for this. Here are my suggestions:
- the archetype version is incorrect (should be alpha-3 or alpha-4 I think)
- remove the version from the 2 plugins that are in development (ie,
unreleased)
since some have multiple categories, how about:
- retaining the current alphabetical list, but s
This is definitely a good idea, to go along with the current information
on mirrors. Do you want to create a jira for it?
- Brett
On 26/07/2006 11:38 AM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
On 7/26/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first one is the old one (pre-death of the codehaus box). We'
I looked at this before and went away to think about it. I don't like
the suggestion of modifying the other plugins - I think we might just
have to live with this as a limitation and ensure that it is properly
considered in Maven 2.1. We could get that particular topic underway for
discussion i
Hi Dennis,
Finally got to look at this. Looks good - worth integrating with the
existing "for committers" part of the site.
Not sure I agree with setting up "Enable snapshot downloading in
settings.xml" though - I never do this. What was the reasoning for
including it?
- Brett
On 24/07/20
Hi,
Currently, v2 of the parent does not have the correct paths to upload
to, but v3 includes the CPD check which is breaking at least the Maven
build and the IDEA plugin.
I would like to propose that we release v4 which is a stable basis, and
then work on a new POM that has the check constraint
curator sounds good.
Milos
On 8/10/06, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curator +1, sounds good to me.
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/2006 06:57:25 PM:
> Please vote for one of the following names:
>
> [ ] Archiva
> [ ] Curator
> [ ] Librarian
> [ ] Nexus
> [ ] Repo
anyone got time to look at these?
--
Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/
Better Builds with Maven - http://library.mergere.com/
--- Begin Message ---
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-754?page=comments#action_71777
]
Andrew Williams commented on CONTINUUM-754:
---
Curator +1, sounds good to me.
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/09/2006 06:57:25 PM:
> Please vote for one of the following names:
>
> [ ] Archiva
> [ ] Curator
> [ ] Librarian
> [ ] Nexus
> [ ] Repository Manager (ie, don't change it)
>
> I'm going to add the following votes for
Hi,
I know I caught the reason from you guys on IRC this morning, apparently
plexus.xml wasn't working - but I'd like to get to the bottom of it.
Are you sure this entirely works? What about if you have
non-components.xml descriptor elements like load-on-start?
I may have made a mistake whe
good catch, will fix
On 10/08/2006 4:19 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Description doesn't match the code, see below...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: brett
Date: Tue Aug 8 18:39:59 2006
New Revision: 429917
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=429917&view=rev
Log:
add quiet option. Some plug
Not quite sure which direction you are going here, but I'd recommend
using the assembly plugin + its unpack goal to do this (shipping just
the one big artifact around, and it can retain internal directory
structure).
- Brett
On 10/08/2006 9:40 AM, Edelson, Justin wrote:
http://www.nabble.com
Things that would help:
- apply each others patches and comment on the jira "this worked for me".
- vote for the issues they need
- ping the dev list when there is a group of related patches available
that someone could do in one hit, as a reminder.
I agree it's an important thing to encourage
For what it's worth, from my work with Harmony, I've seen that maintaining a
high patch application rate provides an enormous boost to contributions. The
more people see their patches being applied and released, the more they'll
contribute.
In any case, is there anything that contributors can do t
Hi,
Here is a rough interface that I have been working to, which I have
fleshed out. These should be all the features in a first beta, but there
are more ideas in JIRA.
http://people.apache.org/~brett/repoman-site/index.html
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
Brett
-
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (15 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MAVENUPLOAD-1040remove unused folder "not-really-jelly/commons-jelly/"
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1040
MAVENUPLOAD-1039jpox: wrong "pom~"
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (27 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MEV-431 axis-jaxrpc and axis-saaj both version 1.4 have no POM
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-431
MEV-413 Jaxen has unnecessary and unexpecte
I don't want to negatively bias the patches I sent in (as I obviously
think they are high priority :) but I am available to amend anything I
have sent in patches for if that helps the patch process.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
On 10/08/2006 9:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Then, SVN will be renamed and I'll put together a beta release.
Just to be clear - this isn't a vote for a release, just saying it will
be about ready for that once the name is selected.
- Brett
--
Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/
Better Bui
Curator +1
-Stephen
On 8/9/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please vote for one of the following names:
[ ] Archiva
[ ] Curator
[ ] Librarian
[ ] Nexus
[ ] Repository Manager (ie, don't change it)
I'm going to add the following votes for curator from the previous
thread so no need
grr, idea template error
On 8/9/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/08/2006 9:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + * Copyright 2005 The Codehaus.
Cut and paste error?
- Brett
--
jesse mcconnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please vote for one of the following names:
[ ] Archiva
[ ] Curator
[ ] Librarian
[ ] Nexus
[ ] Repository Manager (ie, don't change it)
I'm going to add the following votes for curator from the previous
thread so no need to vote again unless you'd like to change it (none of
the others express
http://www.nabble.com/Automating-install%3Ainstall-file-t2071058.html
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 8/9/2006 6:35 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Thread about automating install/deploy
What messages are you referring to?
On 1
On 10/08/2006 9:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * Copyright 2005 The Codehaus.
Cut and paste error?
- Brett
No, but once it is introduced expression will be deprecated.
On 10/08/2006 8:49 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
The expression one also allows you to set params on the command line
with -D. Is there a way to do that without expression?
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
You also need to add -D downloadsources=true to get all associated sources.
-Original Message-
From: Trygve Laugstøl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:59 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: getting sources into eclipse
Berndq wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there an e
+1
-Original Message-
From: Maria Odea Ching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 9:43 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [discuss] A new name for the repository manager?
+1 for Maven Curator :)
nhb wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Brett invited me to post an idea or two I h
The expression one also allows you to set params on the command line
with -D. Is there a way to do that without expression?
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:24 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Difference between d
I found this a bit confusing the read, so I'm not sure - but my
impression that was after the fixes for MWAR-47 and MWAR-55 it is now
working as it should, and if you need different behaviour you should add
a new configuration option. Is that correct?
On 10/08/2006 8:13 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
What messages are you referring to?
On 10/08/2006 6:55 AM, Edelson, Justin wrote:
So hopefully I didn't turn off Mr. Syer entirely... but it did get me
thinking. Does Maven need a new packaging type to do what he's talking
about?
Something like this...
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
Please don't crosspost. Your question should be answered on the users@ list.
Thanks,
Brett
On 10/08/2006 2:25 AM, Berry, Eric wrote:
We have a master POM file that contains common version information,
common plug-in settings, and common repository settings. There are also
two different profile
So I'm looking into the latest war plugin because upgrading from a very
old version (beta2) broke my build. We are currently doing this:
I create wars that are intended to be repackaged by excluding all jars
and some various other files I don't want included (we create 2 wars,
one that can be run
I had a look at the code in the deploy-plugin, and they seem to be doing
sort of the same things, but not in *exactly* the same way. Couldn't
figure out how they are different though. Should I add a link to the
deploy-plugin?
--
Dennis Lundberg
Allan Ramirez wrote:
oopss sorry it should be on
So hopefully I didn't turn off Mr. Syer entirely... but it did get me
thinking. Does Maven need a new packaging type to do what he's talking
about?
Something like this...
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocatio
Description doesn't match the code, see below...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: brett
Date: Tue Aug 8 18:39:59 2006
New Revision: 429917
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=429917&view=rev
Log:
add quiet option. Some plugins will need work.
Modified:
maven/components/branches/maven-2
If you haven't read it already, I would recommend reading this:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/mojo-api-specification.html
It doesn't answer the issue at hand, but then Brett has already done that :)
--
Dennis Lundberg
Cabasson Denis wrote:
Well, I was just wondering, what is the diffe
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
During the last month, around 20 plugins documentations have been
succesfully reviewed and some of them have been staged into user space
on apache.org.
Arnaud already proposed to create a new virtual host [1] for staging
site and I think it is a pretty good idea, avoid
Hi,
During the last month, around 20 plugins documentations have been
succesfully reviewed and some of them have been staged into user space
on apache.org.
Arnaud already proposed to create a new virtual host [1] for staging
site and I think it is a pretty good idea, avoiding some doc issues
(i.e
We have a master POM file that contains common version information,
common plug-in settings, and common repository settings. There are also
two different profiles in this master POM. One profile is used for
development builds. The other profile is used for release builds. All
of our build POMs
I'll look into some of them...
^_^
Brett Porter wrote:
Does anyone have time to apply an occasional patch?
I keep track of them and I now count 223 outstanding. I know many are
sometimes a bit off base, but there's two problems with this:
- we have potential fixes for issues already
- we a
What's the rational of having only one activeByDefault profile?
2006/8/9, Edelson, Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Also, only one profile can be activeByDefault
Is this really the case? I've got 4 profiles with
true and I'm confident at least two
of them are active (I just haven't needed the sett
Thanks for the info, Brett.
Denis.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 9 août 2006 15:24
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : Re: Difference between default-value and expression metatags
>
> They're the same. The first is preferred,
They're the same. The first is preferred, and the second likely to be
deprecated in future.
- Brett
On 9/08/2006 11:16 PM, Cabasson Denis wrote:
Well, I was just wondering, what is the difference between:
/**
[EMAIL PROTECTED] default-value="${project.build.directory}/generated-site/xdoc"
*/
Well, I was just wondering, what is the difference between:
/**
[EMAIL PROTECTED] default-value="${project.build.directory}/generated-site/xdoc"
*/
private File outputDirectory;
And
/**
[EMAIL PROTECTED] expression="${project.build.directory}/generated-site/xdoc"
*/
private File outputDirectory;
53 matches
Mail list logo
