Re: Not using pom.xml

2006-07-14 Thread Eric Redmond
I don't see a way to do this in the way that you want, because those dependencies are resolved before the goal even starts executing. This looks like it would require an extension to Maven, like Hermod mentioned. In the interim, have you considered using Embedded Maven ( http://maven.apache.org/g

[proposal] toolchain support for Maven 2.1

2006-07-14 Thread Brett Porter
When I raised the Java 5 thing, I mentioned needing toolchain support, but probably wasn't clear about what I meant given all the responses about target environments, -source and -target not being enough, and so on. It's probably worth sharing what I was thinking of here for Maven 2.1, regardless

Re: Loom/Phoenix Integration with Plexus

2006-07-14 Thread peter royal
On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:28 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: After meeting Mauro in London we got chatting and eventually started talking about containers, which lead to talking about Loom/ Phoenix and Plexus. One thing lead to another and I asked if we could possibly merge the contain and component cod

Re: Loom/Phoenix Integration with Plexus

2006-07-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
Whoops, wrong list :-) Jason. On 14 Jul 06, at 10:28 AM 14 Jul 06, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, After meeting Mauro in London we got chatting and eventually started talking about containers, which lead to talking about Loom/ Phoenix and Plexus. One thing lead to another and I asked if we cou

Loom/Phoenix Integration with Plexus

2006-07-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, After meeting Mauro in London we got chatting and eventually started talking about containers, which lead to talking about Loom/Phoenix and Plexus. One thing lead to another and I asked if we could possibly merge the contain and component code. A little email exchange ensued and Peter

Re: [proposal] Maven 2.1 Design Topics

2006-07-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 13 Jul 06, at 3:49 PM 13 Jul 06, Jesse McConnell wrote: and as rahul reminded me on the continuum dev list.. http://www.nabble.com/2.1-Design-and-Process-tf1617559.html#a4383722 might be time to resurrect that idea with this jason :) Absolutely, I think a common structure for this with