AW: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread roger.butenuth
Hello! I am not the first one with this problem, see http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2289. We are not using the uniqueVersion feature (we don't want all the versions in our repository). We observe the behaviour with all our artifacts in a company maven-proxy. May be it does not happen aga

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAVENUPLOAD-971) please upload maven-site-plugin 2.0-SNAPSHOT

2006-07-02 Thread Brett Porter
I had some uncommitted changes. It should work now. - Brett On 3/07/2006 11:09 AM, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hello Carlos, sorry to bother you. You say that I should add this section to the pom.xml of commons-sandbox : org.apache apache 1 and remove the repository par

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAVENUPLOAD-971) please upload maven-site-plugin 2.0-SNAPSHOT

2006-07-02 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Carlos, sorry to bother you. You say that I should add this section to the pom.xml of commons-sandbox : org.apache apache 1 and remove the repository part : it is already commented out. With these changes in the pom.xml of the commons-sandbox I still cannot build open

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Brett Porter
yes, that's the one I was referring to, thanks! On 3/07/2006 9:35 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On 7/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately the SNAPSHOT-feature is broken (at least in 2.0.4): When you have a copy of a snapshot versioned artifact, the jar is not updated when

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 7/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately the SNAPSHOT-feature is broken (at least in 2.0.4): When you have a copy of a snapshot versioned artifact, the jar is not updated when a new jar with same snapshot version is uploaded to the repository. I already filed this a

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Brett Porter
You are right. It was turned off in the late betas because we were'nt going to have time to verify the entire repository. With the availability of tools, I think this could be reinstated for 2.1, but I've since rethought it and would rather do this in a way that is more predictable (ie, even i

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Brett Porter
Now, they're referring to when uniqueVersion = false (which is not the default). That feature has always been broken, it was only discovered recently though, and when I attempted to fix it for 2.0.4 it caused a performance degradation and I decided to hold off until it could be more fully consi

Re: I need a promotion

2006-07-02 Thread Brett Porter
Done - sorry it got missed first time round. On 3/07/2006 8:43 AM, Mike Perham wrote: Would someone mind updating me to PMC member in the root Maven POM at pom/maven/pom.xml or give me permission to do it myself? - To unsubscri

Canoo WebTest maven plugin based on WebTest 2.0

2006-07-02 Thread Krystian
Dear Canoo WebTest maven plugin developers! Do you plan to release next plugin version based on Canoo WebTest 2.0 (http://www.canoo.com/news/webtest20.html)? Kind regards, Krystian Nowak - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

I need a promotion

2006-07-02 Thread Mike Perham
Would someone mind updating me to PMC member in the root Maven POM at pom/maven/pom.xml or give me permission to do it myself? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Maybe they've been deploying versions using a normal repository element instead of defining a snapshot repository and -SNAPSHOT version ? On 7/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: YeahEven though in my instance it wasn't what I wanted to happen (not maven's fault, unrelated local

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
YeahEven though in my instance it wasn't what I wanted to happen (not maven's fault, unrelated local patches..), I have seen definite updates of SNAPSHOT builds with the same version. You can pretty easily infer why it works by looking at the timestamp generated poms from them... On 7/2/06,

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I don't know what you're saying, you are the first one complaining about it. SNAPSHOTS work for me On 7/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately the SNAPSHOT-feature is broken (at least in 2.0.4): When you have a copy of a snapshot versioned artifact, the jar is not upda

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Alexandre Poitras
I had the same problem. One quick fix in the mean time is to set uniqueValue to true in the distributionManagement section of the project pom. On 7/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately the SNAPSHOT-feature is broken (at least in 2.0.4): When you have a copy of a snap

AW: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread roger.butenuth
Unfortunately the SNAPSHOT-feature is broken (at least in 2.0.4): When you have a copy of a snapshot versioned artifact, the jar is not updated when a new jar with same snapshot version is uploaded to the repository. I already filed this as a bug and hope it will be fixed in 2.0.5. It is annoyin

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote: Ah.. Well, it used to work in the beta's.. :) There was a problem then with manually installed projects who lacked the status field - it tried to download them from ibiblio which didn't have them, and then the build failed. But that's a long time ago now.

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Carlos Sanchez
That's not implemented yet. Maven won't recheck poms right now. It's just informative On 7/2/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Edwin Punzalan wrote: That's not entirely true. The distributionManagement section has a field that get's set on deploy: http://mave

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Kenney Westerhof
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Edwin Punzalan wrote: That's not entirely true. The distributionManagement section has a field that get's set on deploy: http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-model/maven.html#class_distributionManagement> Gives the status of this artifact in the remote repository. This m

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-07-02 Thread Andrew Williams
This is only true for release repositories though, as a snapshot repository will have an updated version when you re-deploy surely? Andy On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 07:01 +0800, Edwin Punzalan wrote: > May I add, that when maven already downloaded a poor/invalid pom, even > after fixing the pom in the