Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-06-30 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/30/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 30, 2006 5:58 PM Subject: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Is anyone here using Cocoon? They could probab

Re: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-06-30 Thread Alexandre Poitras
I don't know what he complains about. True sometimes the repository quality sucks but just submit a patch and it usually take 3 to 4 days until the problem is solves. Really I don't want to seem arrogant but I haven't had those kind of troubles. On 6/30/06, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Building and using a plugin in the same build (m2)

2006-06-30 Thread David Jencks
In geronimo, we have a plugin that uses a lot of core geronimo functionality, that we would like to use to construct pieces of the server. We seem to have run into a design decision of m2 that a plugin cannot be built and used in the same build. Is this correct, or are we doing something w

RE: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-06-30 Thread Mike Perham
"I'll spare you the details on that one" This does nothing to solve the problem. We can't fix what we don't know about. The quality of the repository metadata has always struck me as something that will make or break the long-term success of Maven. We can only document it as best as possible -

Re: Fw: lucene and maven2

2006-06-30 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Brett means to make a new release to prevent people to use the old broken jar. I've fixed it now, ibiblio should be correct now. I think somebody put that wrong jar in the apache repo some time ago and that was it ended in ibiblio. On 6/30/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry,

Fwd: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us....

2006-06-30 Thread Torsten Curdt
FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jun 30, 2006 5:58 PM Subject: [RANT] This Maven thing is killing us To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Hi gang, It's Friday, I'm tired and a bit depressed after losing about two more hours unsuccessfully

Re: Fw: lucene and maven2

2006-06-30 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Sorry, I'no Maven expert, and I'm not sure what you mean. 2.0.1 - are you referring to Lucene? We don't have 2.0.1 yet - 2.0.0 is the latest release. The 394k Jar is the Lucene's binary Jar (all .class files inside), so I'm not sure why you say that should be removed. Looking at http://www.ibib

extracting the default Maven2 directory layout

2006-06-30 Thread Ovidio Mallo
Hi, is there some way to enumerate the individual directories of the default Maven2 directory layout as described in http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html in order to avoid having to hardcode the directories in some client code which needs

Re: Fw: lucene and maven2

2006-06-30 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I don't see any new stuff in the rsync process. Also there must be something wrong with the jar at http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/2.0.0/ because it's 394k. I think I should delete it in the meantime so people don't get it corrupt. On 6/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROT

Re: War 2.0.2

2006-06-30 Thread Mark Hobson
Hi Brett, That was the only regression I noticed - a 2.0.2 release would be great thanks. Cheers, Mark On 30/06/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Mark, I think we should do a release soon (or we get in the situation like 2.0.1 where I fixed it, voted straight away, and then came

Re: [surefire jdk1.3 build trunk - FAILED - update] Fri Jun 30 07:55:01 GMT 2006

2006-06-30 Thread Brett Porter
Heh, probably shouldn't have been ignoring these /export/home/maven/m2-build/surefire/trunk/maven-surefire/surefire-booter/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/booter/output/FileOutputConsumerProxy.java:[115,18] cannot resolve symbol symbol : constructor RuntimeException (java.io.IOExc

Re: [vote] maven war 2.0.1

2006-06-30 Thread Brett Porter
I forgot to post the result on this one... +1 (binding): Emmanuel, Brett, Stephane +1 (committer): Fabrice +1 (user): Thierry I'm not going to post the announcement on this one until we decide if there'll be a 2.0.2 which I'll merge if we do. ... Brett I'd like to release the WAR plugin 2.0.

Re: War 2.0.2

2006-06-30 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Mark, I think we should do a release soon (or we get in the situation like 2.0.1 where I fixed it, voted straight away, and then came back to release it a month later :) Are there any other issues that need attention? - Brett On 29/06/2006 1:24 AM, Mark Hobson wrote: Thanks for fixing t

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/06/2006 2:54 AM, Alexandre Poitras wrote: I had started some documentation based on the Trails idea : http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/The+Maven+2+tutorial but stopped since "Better Builds with Maven" was exactly what I wanted to produce. Feel to use anything. Sorry to discoura