Hey Guys,
Just looking over some of the code, and noticed this
in
DefaultArchetype.
private static final String
DEFAULT_TEST_RESOURCE_DIR = "/src/test/resources";
private static final String
DEFAULT_TEST_SOURCE_DIR = "/src/test/java";
private static final String DEFAULT_RESOURCE_DI
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 19 Jun 06, at 12:37 AM 19 Jun 06, Brett Porter wrote:
John Casey wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know we've talked about this quite a bit already. Actually, I'm having
trouble finding the past threads on this topic in my email...can
someone who
knows please link them in?
btw
Then just ask them to make a new release and provide the right metadata ;)
On 6/25/06, Stephen Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/sitemap.html != http://xmlbeans.apache.org/
- Stephen
On 6/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you'd have to ge
http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/sitemap.html != http://xmlbeans.apache.org/
- Stephen
On 6/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, you'd have to get in touch with the team that developes it. But
I think they already deploy the right stuff into org.apache.xbean
http://www.ibiblio
Well, you'd have to get in touch with the team that developes it. But
I think they already deploy the right stuff into org.apache.xbean
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/org/apache/xbean/
On 6/25/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I mentioned in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-406 th
As I mentioned in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-406 the poms
for xmlbeans 2.0 are seriously broken. While it seems to me that
carlos' concerns about changing the xmlbeans 2.0.0 pom are completely
contrary to the mev instructions, I'd like to at least avoid the same
situation occurrin
That's solely because Mike fixed them in the last week.
I'm still not sure if anyone has reviewed the unscheduled bugs for
critical updates and patches to apply.
Other than that, I believe it just docs that are needed now.
- Brett
On 26/06/2006 4:53 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Brett Porter w
Brett Porter wrote:
> They should be the ones scheduled for 2.1 (and there may be some
> unscheduled that should be scheduled - I haven't reviewed recently). I
> know at least that Jerome had a queue of patches. I've been meaning to
> take a look
I don't know, which issues fall under "should
On 6/25/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please note that you should not deploy the files into
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/ if you do deploy to
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository
It's not needed and may add confusion, also because they are under
different gr
Hi ,
Would like to know how to generate webdoclet (i.e. tld file) in maven
2.0 version. I was successful in generation ejbdoclets through maven x-doclet
plugin using the below plugin.
org.codehaus.mojo
xdoclet-maven-plugin
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 24 Jun 06, at 6:25 PM 24 Jun 06, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I want to be able to use the log instance returned from
Mojo.getLog() in a class that is used by Mojo. The class itself is
not a Mojo, b
11 matches
Mail list logo
