On 22/06/2006 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: carlos
Date: Wed Jun 21 17:27:49 2006
New Revision: 416184
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416184&view=rev
Log:
Added checkstyle configuration and pmd check for duplications
Won't that fail the build?
Shouldn't the checks be in a
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (13 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MAVENUPLOAD-953Custom dom4j for Maven 1
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-953
MAVENUPLOAD-944Version 1.1 of UISPec4J
http://jira.codeha
Issue Subscription
Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (37 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MEV-416 tapestry-contrib 4.0.2 is missing a pom
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-416
MEV-392 bad dependencies in commons-logging-1.1.pom
On 6/19/06, Rinku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Some sites:
[A] http://java.sun.com/javase/
[B] http://ant.apache.org/
Some notes:
1) L.H.S nav categories are concise. For example, "Reference" in [A]
above has links to all documentation resources. "Community" has all the
stuff about forum
they'll be used for all maven
you're right, i'm gonna remove them and link to the svn version
On 6/21/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are these linked or configured from anywhere?
Any reason not to point directly at the SVN version which will always be
up to date?
- Brett
On 21/06
both ;) I thought about that too.
On 6/21/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you changing these because you think these are the best final value,
or because the current code isn't close to complying?
If it's the former, that's cool; if it's the latter I'd suggest we
should keep the
And remember also to apply later changes to that files that were not
ported to the branch as they didn't exist there.
On 6/21/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 20/06/2006 10:27 PM, jerome lacoste wrote:
> On 6/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1, but considering it
which was user contributed and then mostly abandoned. I was using it
as a teaching tool for a friend of mine but I would be cool with axing
it from the released mojo list if something like this came along.
a pretty-print mojo might be nice in that as well, so making sure all
xml is properly form
Note that there's already a XSLT plugin at mojo for transformations:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/xslt-maven-plugin/
Mark
On 21/06/06, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written a plugin, which I currently call maven-xml-plugin. This first
> version
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
I have written a plugin, which I currently call maven-xml-plugin. This first
version is able to validate XML documents (test phase) or to transform XML
documents by applying an XSLT stylesheet (generate-resources). So far
development is finished (including a test suite
This issue was re-opened for the docs... and i've updated the docs so I
closed it.
Brett Porter wrote:
Was this actually fixed, or "Cannot reproduce"?
- Brett
On 19/06/2006 7:46 PM, Edwin Punzalan (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-149?page=all ]
Edwin Punzala
11 matches
Mail list logo
