Thanks Dennis! See my comments in-line.
- There is no longer a pdf.gif file under /images/.
This was deleted by Arnaud in rev 386905
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=386905), and moved to
the pdf plugin. Is there an issue with that?
- The "Downloads" link always shows up i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Sun Jun 11 11:33:41 2006
New Revision: 413502
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413502&view=rev
Log:
MWAR-45: patch applied and snapshot deployed
Could we get this log updated to reflect what the change was?
Thanks,
Brett
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Sun Jun 11 11:33:41 2006
New Revision: 413502
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413502&view=rev
Log:
MWAR-45: patch applied and snapshot deployed
Could we get this log updated to reflect what the change was?
--
You used an old version of the release plugin.
You should revert the change entirely as it did more to the pom (like
removing things and reordering it), as well as delete the bogus tag.
- Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Sun Jun 11 07:35:18 2006
New Revision: 413456
URL:
I've just deployed Lucene Core 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 to the ASF M2 repo:
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/lucene/lucene-core/
Please sync to ibiblio. TIA.
--
Martin Cooper
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 7:07 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] move maven-archiver from components to shared
>
> I propose that we move v2.1 of maven-archiver to the /shared/
> area of SVN. I th
+1 nice idea
On 6/11/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose that we move v2.1 of maven-archiver to the /shared/ area of
SVN. I think we should leave it on the branch for now, though.
This will allow it it's own release cycle, so that plugins can depend on
it sooner than Maven rel
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi,
will anybody from the maven team be at ApacheCon in Dublin? I see that
at least Jason will be there (great!), but nobody signed up for the
Hackathon yet...
just courius, I will be there at least for the first 2 days, and hope
to meet you there... (and just a few days
I propose that we move v2.1 of maven-archiver to the /shared/ area of
SVN. I think we should leave it on the branch for now, though.
This will allow it it's own release cycle, so that plugins can depend on
it sooner than Maven releases. Nothing in Maven itself depends on it.
Cheers,
Brett
--
jerome lacoste wrote:
Someone might want to create a test case for a branch issue without
looking at the trunk. And it's better to keep itest ids synchronized.
That would be against our development practices we agreed on a while
back (everything goes through trunk).
The only scenario would b
Hi,
will anybody from the maven team be at ApacheCon in Dublin? I see that
at least Jason will be there (great!), but nobody signed up for the
Hackathon yet...
just courius, I will be there at least for the first 2 days, and hope
to meet you there... (and just a few days before there is also the
Here's some feedback on the new xdoc plugin. I've ran it on a couple of
Jakarta Commons components, which have various degrees of
xdoc-complexity. This is what has caught my eye:
- There is no longer a pdf.gif file under /images/. None of the tested
products has PDF docs generated, so this mig
The assembly plugin was released in mid-May, and most of the website
is updated, but not the descriptor:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html
That page is still dated last October, and doesn't show the new
element.
Thanks,
Wendy
On 6/9/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Carlos,
> Kenney, could you check it0105 and it0107 and merge its revisions them
> to the 2.0.x branch, or does it not apply?
it0107 is related to MNG-2293 which is only applied to trunk, so that o
14 matches
Mail list logo
