Re: Can we please have websites for maven-changelog-plugin and maven-changes-plugin?

2006-05-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
According to my notes they had both had a 2.0-beta-1 release over at codehaus, probably in the snapshot repo, before they were moved here. Mike Perham wrote: Have those plugins ever been released, even in snapshot form? -Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: checkstyle plugin and propertyExpansion

2006-05-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
${basedir} has backslashes... and is parsed wrongly by: p.load( new StringInputStream( propertyExpansion ) ); Carsten Karkola wrote: We have our own checkstyle config with some file references. I tried to use them with org.apache.maven.plugins maven-checkstyle-plu

Re: Cannon generate maven-checkstyle-plugin site

2006-05-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Fixed in svn. Thanks. Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote: Hello Checkstyle plugin site checkstyle mojo has no content: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin/checkstyle-mojo.html I tried to generate it myself from sources. It fails with an error during xml parsing for trunk and tags

Re: svn commit: r407769 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-deploy-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/deploy/DeployFileMojo.java

2006-05-21 Thread Allan Ramirez
Kenney Westerhof wrote: On Fri, 19 May 2006, Brett Porter wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /** + * Description passed to a generated POM file (in case of generatePom=true) + * + * @parameter expression="${generatePom.description}" + */ +private String descrip

Re: svn commit: r408479 - /maven/sandbox/issue/rissue/README.apt

2006-05-21 Thread Jason Van Zyl
I guess the only solution is to stop using Windows. jason. On 5/21/06, Edwin Punzalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi. sorry, but i can't update my windows svn copy of this bec there's already readme.apt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: jvanzyl > Date: Sun May 21 13:13:00 2006 > New Revis

Re: svn commit: r408479 - /maven/sandbox/issue/rissue/README.apt

2006-05-21 Thread Edwin Punzalan
hi. sorry, but i can't update my windows svn copy of this bec there's already readme.apt. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jvanzyl Date: Sun May 21 13:13:00 2006 New Revision: 408479 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=408479&view=rev Log: (empty) Added: maven/sandbox/issue/rissue/R

RE: site verbosity

2006-05-21 Thread Mike Perham
I didn't see a reply. Anyone know? -Original Message- From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 10:45 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: site verbosity There are a number of JIRA issues related to velocity verbosity. All of them are marked as fixed and y

RE: Can we please have websites for maven-changelog-plugin and maven-changes-plugin?

2006-05-21 Thread Mike Perham
Have those plugins ever been released, even in snapshot form? -Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2006 4:53 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Can we please have websites for maven-changelog-plugin and maven-changes-plugin? Hi Sinc

Can we please have websites for maven-changelog-plugin and maven-changes-plugin?

2006-05-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Since codehaus went down there has been a couple of requests on the user-list for documentation for maven-changelog-plugin and maven-changes-plugin. After they moved over from codehaus they have not been graced with a web presence at maven.apache.org. Users following the links on http://m

Re: [proposal] terminating the maven-2.0.x branch

2006-05-21 Thread Arik Kfir
I think the idea is not to terminate it, but simply to move further development to the trunk, and use the branch only for bug fixes (e.g. 2.0.6/7/8...) while the trunk will be used for the main development (2.1 for instance). On 5/21/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Brett Porter wr

Re: [proposal] terminating the maven-2.0.x branch

2006-05-21 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I propose we focus on developing Maven 2.1 with both a mix of new features and bug fixes. If we identify the need for a 2.0.5, we should manually merge changes there based on revisions from trunk, bearing in mind our new dev process. Why would anyone terminate a bug f

[Fwd: M2Eclipse]

2006-05-21 Thread Brian K. Wallace
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tried the user list with no response, so I figured I'd go the dev route. Is there any place to get this outside of codehaus? Or a specific URL at codehaus to use (as it was noted that project specific URLs will work when the main URLs won't)? -BEGI