Re: Maven Not Resolving Dependencies

2006-05-17 Thread Ole Ersoy
John, I'd be extremely glad to do that at this point, because I think I'm out of options. I've tried deleting .m2, installing an older version of java (1.5.02), upgrading maven to 2.0.4...I could go back to ant, but that would be like plowing a field with a horse and buggie. OK - I setup a reall

Re: Maven Not Resolving Dependencies

2006-05-17 Thread John Casey
Can you attach a copy of your pom and the output from the build when you run with the -X switch? This will give us some clues to start helping you out. BTW, we've had some network trouble lately with the repository pointer ( repo1.maven.org), and it could be affecting you... Cheers, John On 5/1

Re: Maven Not Resolving Dependencies

2006-05-17 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hi, I'm using myfaces...version 1.1.1. I thought it might be an issue with the myfaces download, but I have the same issue with other libraries as well. Thanks for trying though, - Ole --- Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads

2006-05-17 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (18 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MAVENUPLOAD-906Add sources to commons-httpclient-3.0.1 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-906 MAVENUPLOAD-905Upload 1.2B3 "cayenne", "cayenne-nodeps

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism

2006-05-17 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (30 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MEV-394 Axis' dependencies aren't specified in ibiblio http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-394 MEV-392 bad dependencies in commons-logging-1.1.pom

Re: Maven Not Resolving Dependencies

2006-05-17 Thread Alexandre Poitras
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html Just use myfaces instead of the reference implementation. On 5/17/06, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey Guys, I posted this on the users list, but I'm starting that maybe it's a bug. I'm running 2.0.4. Maven downloads

Maven Not Resolving Dependencies

2006-05-17 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hey Guys, I posted this on the users list, but I'm starting that maybe it's a bug. I'm running 2.0.4. Maven downloads dependencies fine from Ibiblio, and after running the eclipse plugin, eclipse can see them all. However maven does not and I get messages like: java:[4,29] package javax.faces.

Re: aggregating report

2006-05-17 Thread Brett Porter
I'm not happy with the current aggregation support in reports. For Javadoc I did it by a flag to allow the same report to work for both single and multi-module projects (if in root and aggregate on, iterate through the reactor projects and generate as an aggregate, if not in the root don't gene

RE: aggregating report

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Perham
Hmm. I assume the mail server strips HTML attachments? -Original Message- From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:10 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: aggregating report I'm trying to build an aggregating version of the JavaNCSS report. We have

aggregating report

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Perham
I'm trying to build an aggregating version of the JavaNCSS report. We have 30-40 modules but don't want to mine those reports by hand for totals. The issue is simply one of ordering: when I generate the top-level site, it runs my aggregating report BEFORE the child reports. My report is generat

How to write a test case for the maven-site-plugin?

2006-05-17 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hello developers I'm trying to figure out how to write a test case for the Maven 2 site-plugin. But I can't seem to figure out how the existing tests work. Under src/test there is a "projects" folder which contain a bunch of folders, one for each test. Every one of those contains what seems t

RE: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Perham
Well, there's a delay cause now it works. :-) Thanks. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 2:28 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: surefire patch needs review Mike Perham wrote: > Brett, I'm still getting a 403 Forbidden

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Brett Porter
Mike Perham wrote: Brett, I'm still getting a 403 Forbidden when I try to check in. Is there a cron job I need to wait for? There shouldn't be a delay. Have you got it checked out as https? - Brett - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Hmmm...I'm not remembering so well these days either. (I'm also a bit disconnected from what the current surefire code looks like) When I double checked the isTestNGClass logic though it confirmed that the basic function is for it to look for ~any~ annotations on the class in question. (whether q

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Brett Porter
Jesse Kuhnert wrote: P.S. Not using TestNGClassFinder.isTestNGClass is the exact reason (probably?..) why someone's base class with no test methods and only @Configuration methods might not be found. Unlikely, as it is going to assume it's a TestNG class as long as it doesn't extend TestCase,

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Brett Porter
Mike Perham wrote: Sorry, I wasn't trying to denigrate anyone, esp Brett. I think we've all written dodgy code in our day. I just got a chuckle out of the particular word choice. Certainly no offence taken. I fully admit to its dodginess (it was an improvement over not working at all, that's

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
P.S. Not using TestNGClassFinder.isTestNGClass is the exact reason (probably?..) why someone's base class with no test methods and only @Configuration methods might not be found. On 5/17/06, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry, I wasn't trying to denigrate anyone, esp Brett. I think w

RE: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Perham
Sorry, I wasn't trying to denigrate anyone, esp Brett. I think we've all written dodgy code in our day. I just got a chuckle out of the particular word choice. Brett, I'm still getting a 403 Forbidden when I try to check in. Is there a cron job I need to wait for? -Original Message- Fr

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
To be fair, there was definitely more than a ~little~ bit of pressure being put on Brett at the time...This might have been something I had in one of the original patches submitted as well I don't think extending a junit test necessarily makes it a junit test though...Let me double check.. Y

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Brett Porter
Actually, yes, this will currently work. I was thinking they'd be from different classloaders, but for TestNG that is not currently the case. - Brett Mike Perham wrote: I presume this is what you are talking about: // TODO: this is a bit dodgy, but isTestNGClass wasn't working

RE: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Perham
I presume this is what you are talking about: // TODO: this is a bit dodgy, but isTestNGClass wasn't working if ( "junit.framework.TestCase".equals( testSet.getTestClass().getSuperclass().getName() ) ) { xmlTest.setJUnit( true ); } Dodgy, indeed. Shoul

Re: surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Brett Porter
It looks fine, but incomplete. I'd forgotten about this better base class, and also referenced TestCase in the TestNG provider. If you can update that as well, then it should be fine. I've given you commit rights on surefire. Cheers, Brett Mike Perham wrote: I have fixed http://jira.codehaus

surefire patch needs review

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Perham
I have fixed http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-113 but don't have commit privileges. This is a major regression versus 2.1.3 and for those of us who run Junit tests via suites a blocker. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P