+1
Milos
On 5/1/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 1 May 06, at 1:29 PM 1 May 06, Brett Porter wrote:
> Please test this as much as you can first, given that the
> classloader has change somewhat.
>
> Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
> maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.17235
+1
On 1 May 06, at 1:29 PM 1 May 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the
classloader has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and
2.0-20060501.172351-2 (r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http
Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Woohoo! +1 (non-binding)
Just don't forget to strip out that isSnapshot() call on the
surefire-2.0 branch… :)
If it's the one I'm thinking of, it can (should) stay.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Woohoo! +1 (non-binding)
Just don't forget to strip out that isSnapshot() call on the
surefire-2.0 branch… :)
— G
On May 1, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the
classloader has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and 2.0-20060501.172351-2
(r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11148&s
wow! I didn't know a tool such as maven registry existed!!!
you guys should really add a link to it in the maven site! :)
On 5/1/06, Carlos Sanchez (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-384?page=comments#action_64492 ]
Carlos Sanchez commented on MEV-384:
Yeah, I see the problem - getBaseVersion isn't returning the -SNAPSHOT,
but the timestamped one. Will fix, but the timestamps are lined up now.
BTW, you can use both repositories - you don't need to remove the
codehaus one for cobertura.
- Brett
Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Snapshot 20060501.153
Snapshot 20060501.153032-1 works. Thanks!
On May 1, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Make sure you are using cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository
as a snapshot repository, not snapshots.maven.codehaus.org.
That's how the test pr
On May 1, 2006, at 4:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Make sure you are using cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository as
a snapshot repository, not snapshots.maven.codehaus.org.
That's how the test project was configured. My live project also
includes codehaus.org for Cobertura support. However,
Summary:
binding: 5 binding, 1 non-binding
I'll release it in a little bit, thanks much all!
jesse
On 4/29/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 (non binding)
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 27, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> +1
>
> Vincent
>
> 2006/4/27, Stephane Nicol
Hello again. A just finisched my a first jbuilder plugin and an application
plugin.
If anyone is interested in developing the jbuilder plugin fther please
contact me. At the moment it only generates library files and that's enough
for me. Same so for my old maven 1.1 plugin. Never needed more sin
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Brett Porter wrote:
> ok, see now that the issue was closed.
>
> I'm not sure how you see the "old style" tests as cleaner. What makes
> the new ones less clean in your opinion? The IT's are certainly not unit
> tests (the plugin framework tests are only just barely units
> the
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Brett Porter wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: kenney
> > Date: Sun Apr 30 15:01:04 2006
> > New Revision: 398452
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398452&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Added testcase for MRESOURCES-18. This should really go into
> > the resourc
Try again now (I've upgraded to the release version of test NG). Make
sure you are using cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository as a
snapshot repository, not snapshots.maven.codehaus.org.
Cheers,
Brett
Gordon Henriksen wrote:
So this afternoon, the latest surefire snapshot landed and began t
now down to 3 (all related to class loading - the child delegation thing).
Brett Porter wrote:
I did this for surefire itself, and the plugin. IMO, this is stable now
(all the bugs in JIRA were problems in the old surefire as well), and is
much improved (better error reporting, output, testng s
15 matches
Mail list logo
