Re: How can I add a component/service to Continuum?

I think you need to add it to the "/apps/continuum/conf/application.xml" file On 4/29/06, Rinku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have created a service/component which I would like to add to my local Continuum installation. Any idea how can achieve it? TIA, Rahul -

How can I add a component/service to Continuum?

Hi, I have created a service/component which I would like to add to my local Continuum installation. Any idea how can achieve it? TIA, Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: MavenEmbedder and --no-plugin-updates

Hi, The best example of using the embedder is now actually the front-end command line harness which starts up maven in the way you are most accustomed: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/components/trunk/maven-cli/ src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/MavenCli.java?rev=392327&view=marku

Re: Help with plugin - is this possible?

that is referring to things like the idea plugin which generates the files necessary to import the project into idea.. invoked on the commandline as 'mvn idea:idea' which would be triggering the idea plugin, the idea goal so the idea plugin would never be meant to be part of the normal build li

RE: Help with plugin - is this possible?

-Original Message- >From: dan tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 5:48 PM >To: Maven Developers List >Subject: Re: Help with plugin - is this possible? > >If they are not using Continuum, ask them to use CruiseControl ;-) just kidding. Just a little humor I

Re: Synchronisation of the ObjectWeb repository with ibiblio

Xavier, exo artifacts don't follow maven2 naming conventions. They are including things under org/apache which is absolutly forbidden, and they are still using group exo, when it shoud be a fully qualified domain, like org/objectweb/exo or com/exoplatform (if it's the latest you hav eto tell us to

Re: standardising TODOs

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Brett Porter wrote: For people not using IntelliJ this doesn't work. Eclispe has 3 default tags: XXX - severe problem, but might work in some/most cases FIXME - indicates a workaround/too simple solution and should be addressed before a release TODO - improvements Ma

standardising TODOs

Hi, Does anyone have any thoughts on standard marking for "TODO" elements? Currently, I've got mine set up: Important: (\bXXX\b.*|\bIMPORTANT\b.*|\btodo\b.*\!.*) ie, a line with XXX, IMPORTANT, or TODO with an ! on the line (eg TODO [!]: ...) Normal: (?m)\btodo\b[^!?\n]*$ ie, any line with TO