Yes, this has been brought up as a potential deficiency in the User
list by a few people who were struggling to get Central mirroring set
up so no external repos are ever touched...
Wayne
On 4/21/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe Maven should simply ignore repos with snapshot
Hi all,
Is this ready for release yet? I saw voting, but no final conclusion.
I am about to install a copy of v1.0.2, and was hoping to put in v1.0.3
instead if possible.
Regards,
Graham
--
Mike , the requirements for SCM are to tag (label) the entire soure tree
before the build for reproduciblity and QA uses the tag for their issue
tracking
purpose. The tag is the ${version}, all modules in source tree use the same
version.
So maven-release-plugin fits the bill. and we use Continnum
Maybe Maven should simply ignore repos with snapshots when referenced from a
released POM.
Additionally I am asking myself if a repo definition in a POM does any good
anyway. Imagine we have 3 projects at SF called A, B and C and C is dependend
on B is dependend on A. The committers of the 3 p
Dan, why does the build label require releasing? We have anthill label
our daily build source but that doesn't require releasing... Can't you
just use the scm:tag goal at the end of your build?
-Original Message-
From: dan tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:3
Mike, at my work, each daily build must accompany a label. So cut the
daily release
is the way to go. I also work with another smaller project that adopting
maven release
process where daily build is from the snapshot build, we only cut a release
when a
millestone reaches.
-D
On 4/21/06, Mi
Take a look at o.a.m.p:maven-plugins:1. Most of the current plugins use
ver 1 as their parent POM and so use the server below as their snapshot
repo. Am I understanding how this works correctly?
snapshots
Maven Central Development Repository
http://snapshots.maven.codeh
Why would you ever want to auto-release something? Isn't a release done
when the module owner believes it is stable, not on an scheduled time
table? I would think a daily release should take the form of a
SNAPSHOT.
-Original Message-
From: dan tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursd
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Maven Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by AndrewKuzmin:
http://wiki.apache.org/maven/FrontPage
--
There is n
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Maven Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by AndrewKuzmin:
http://wiki.apache.org/maven/FrontPage
--
There is n
Hi
Is there any news on this plugin - Currently it does nothing but print the
tableheader with no issues listed.
Hermod
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This email with attachments is solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addre
You can define too the in application.xml so all mails will be sent to this address
instead of address define in project :-)
Emmanuel
Arnaud HERITIER a écrit :
Yes we can move it to a property that I'll override in the build definition
with -Dsomething.
I'll try that as soon I'll can commit.
sure, but project can use a property for notifier address and define it in a
profile.
File an issue and I'll look for adding the possibility to not send messages for
non-official ci server.
Emmanuel
jerome lacoste a écrit :
On 4/21/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Continuum i
On 4/21/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Continuum is a young project.
That's not a continuum specific issue to me :)
And profiles don't seem to allow modifying the ciManagement section
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-profiles.html
I have a CI setu
Yes we can move it to a property that I'll override in the build definition
with -Dsomething.
I'll try that as soon I'll can commit.
Arnaud
On 4/21/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hehe.
>
> Perhaps with properties, address define in project.properties and in your
> build.prope
hehe.
Perhaps with properties, address define in project.properties and in your build.properties you
define it to empty or your address
Emmanuel
Arnaud HERITIER a écrit :
For maven 2 ;-)
But for maven 1 I have actually no workaround.
Arnaud
On 4/21/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It will be in 1.1 with continuum profiles.
Emmanuel
Arnaud HERITIER a écrit :
Continuum is a young project.
I agree, I hope it will be possible in a near future to launch on the same
instance a given build using several JDK. For that it is necessary that
continuum doesn't use the system path to
For maven 2 ;-)
But for maven 1 I have actually no workaround.
Arnaud
On 4/21/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it's possible to define the notifiers in a profile in pom, but
> never try it.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Allison, Bob a écrit :
> > But what do I do if the development
Continuum is a young project.
I agree, I hope it will be possible in a near future to launch on the same
instance a given build using several JDK. For that it is necessary that
continuum doesn't use the system path to find the jdk, maven, .. and allow
the user to define where is each installation.
I think it's possible to define the notifiers in a profile in pom, but never
try it.
Emmanuel
Allison, Bob a écrit :
But what do I do if the development staff has one CI instance with reports
going to the developers and the QA people have their own CI instance and want
reports going to their
Yes know this tip, but I want to receive the notification (but only me
actually ;-) )
Arnaud
On 4/21/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you don't want to send messages, comment the mail notifier in
> application.xml or define a wrong
> address for your smtp server.
>
> Emmanue
But what do I do if the development staff has one CI instance with reports
going to the developers and the QA people have their own CI instance and want
reports going to their staff? There is no way to accomplish this other than
forcing each CI instance to override the notifier list in the POM,
If you don't want to send messages, comment the mail notifier in application.xml or define a wrong
address for your smtp server.
Emmanuel
Arnaud HERITIER a écrit :
Sorry, I didn't want to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My setup is not already finished, but I can't disable the notification to
the
ok for me
arnaud
On 4/21/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone mind if I move this file to /maven/pom?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: vmassol
> > Date: Thu Apr 20 10:51:05 2006
> > New Revision: 395661
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395661&view=rev
> > L
On 4/21/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't want to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> My setup is not already finished, but I can't disable the notification to
> the mail registred in the POM.
> It's just a temporary test. If it help us I'll ask you how we can move it in
>
Sorry, I didn't want to send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My setup is not already finished, but I can't disable the notification to
the mail registred in the POM.
It's just a temporary test. If it help us I'll ask you how we can move it in
the continuum instance @ apache.
Arnaud
>
> On 4/21/06, Contin
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vendredi 21 avril 2006 00:18
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r395661 - /maven/maven-1/core/trunk/KEYS
>
> Anyone mind if I move this file to /maven/pom?
Fine with me...
Thanks
-Vincent
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
