Re: Maven tutorial

2006-03-19 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Thank Brett, I'll do my best. In the first part, where I explain basic concepts, I sometimes reproduce some of the already existing content but I always try to make the explanations clearer and add some details. Sometimes the existing documentation is good but presented in a very rude way. And let

Re: Maven tutorial

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
I plan to take a look when I get some time. The important things I'd keep in mind: - don't just reproduce documentation that already exists (like installation instructions). The last attempt at a tutorial on the wiki did this and then just petered out as it wasn't very useful. This doesn't appear t

Re: [vote] [m1] PMD plugin v1.8 for maven 1.x

2006-03-19 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi all, We are ready to release a new version of the PMD plugin. All bugs issues are solved and there's only one enhancement opened in Jira. Changes in this version include: New Features: o New property "maven.pmd.targetjdk" to define the target JDK.

[result] Re: [vote] Brian Fox as a plugins committer

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
+1: Vincent, Vincent, Emmanuel, Stephane, Edwin, Arnaud, Allan, Fabrizio, Mike, John, Brett, Lukas - Brett Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > Brian has done a great job in keeping the mojo project in order and has > developed the dependency plugin there, which we previously indicated > we'd like to h

[result] Re: [vote] Fabrice Bellingard as a plugins committer

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
+1: Vincent, Vincent, Emmanuel, Stephane, Edwin, Arnaud, Allan, Fabrizio, Mike, John, Brett, Lukas I'll follow up. - Brett Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > Fabrice worked on the JXR plugin, fixed a number of bugs in the original > library and improved the mojo. Active on the users list, with a > p

[result] Re: [vote] Bring plugins to Maven

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
Sorry for getting sidetracked: +1: Lukas, Vincent S, Emmanuel, Stephane, Raphael, Fabrizio, Kenney, Yann, Mike, John, Carlos (all but dep), Arnaud +0: Vincent M, Carlos (dep) I'll get this happening. - Brett Brett Porter wrote: > A month ago I sent a proposal for discussion, to bring some mojos

Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
On 3/18/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Actually I believe we should simply configure jira to not allow an issue > > to > > be closed without an assignee. The same should apply for not specifying a > > "fix for" field, etc. Those fields should be defined as mandatory.

RE: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: dimanche 19 mars 2006 18:46 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee > > I think you misunderstood my point. It was not at all about opening > issues. In brief, I want to

Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Lukas Theussl
I think you misunderstood my point. It was not at all about opening issues. In brief, I want to be able to set a fix for version (eg because somebody attaches a patch, or to set up a roadmap) without having to assign the issue (eg because I don't have time right now to test the patch, and I don

Re: [vote] [m1] PMD plugin v1.8 for maven 1.x

2006-03-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On 3/18/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We are ready to release a new version of the PMD plugin. > All bugs issues are solved and there's only one enhancement opened in Jira. > > Changes in this version include: > > New Features: > > > o New property

RE: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: dimanche 19 mars 2006 02:38 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee [snip] > I also don't like the idea of making it obligatory to assign an issue > for closing or setti