[maven2 build branches/maven-2.0.x - SUCCESS - update] Mon Feb 20 05:45:01 GMT 2006

2006-02-19 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-20060220.054501.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-build-log-20060220.054501.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mai

[maven2 build trunk - SUCCESS - update] Mon Feb 20 05:00:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-19 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/trunk/m2-20060220.050001.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/trunk/m2-build-log-20060220.050001.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

[maven2 build trunk - SUCCESS - update] Mon Feb 20 04:30:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-19 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/trunk/m2-20060220.043001.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/trunk/m2-build-log-20060220.043001.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: is anyone else having trouble with the scp wagon?

2006-02-19 Thread Brett Porter
MNG-1908 (which caused another regression, so now there are two things to fix with it :) John Casey wrote: > that did it, thanks brett. > > What was the reason for the switch? > > -j - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: is anyone else having trouble with the scp wagon?

2006-02-19 Thread John Casey
that did it, thanks brett. What was the reason for the switch? -j Brett Porter wrote: I think I swapped to getIfNewer for... something... for 2.0.3. Try with 2.0.2. I was pretty sure I fixed this issue, but obviously we need to resolve it before the 2.0.3 release. - Brett John Casey wrote:

Re: is anyone else having trouble with the scp wagon?

2006-02-19 Thread Brett Porter
I think I swapped to getIfNewer for... something... for 2.0.3. Try with 2.0.2. I was pretty sure I fixed this issue, but obviously we need to resolve it before the 2.0.3 release. - Brett John Casey wrote: > I'm trying to release the file-management and the maven-clean-plugin, > and I'm failing

is anyone else having trouble with the scp wagon?

2006-02-19 Thread John Casey
I'm trying to release the file-management and the maven-clean-plugin, and I'm failing on the deployment of file-management with an UnsupportedOperationException in the scp wagon. Does anyone know about this? The stacktrace follows: I'll continue to check into this as time allows, but may just

Re: [vote] Release maven-clean-plugin 2.1

2006-02-19 Thread John Casey
Binding: 6 (John, Brett, Carlos, Emmanuel, Lukas, Arnaud) Non-Binding: 4 (Fabrizio, Vincent S, Allan, Stephane) The vote thread can be found here: http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-maven-clean-plugin-2.1-t1124590.html#a2969256 I'll get this release out. Thanks, John John Casey (mergere) wr

Re: [vote] Release file-management in maven/shared 1.0

2006-02-19 Thread John Casey
Binding: 5 (John, Emmanuel, Lukas, Arnaud, Jason) Non-Binding: 1 (Vincent S) The vote thread is here: http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-file-management-in-maven-shared-1.0-t1128724.html#a2954028 I'll get this release out. -john John Casey wrote: Hi again, I forgot to mention yesterday,

[continuum build trunk - SUCCESS - checkout] Mon Feb 20 01:00:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-19 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/builds/trunk/continuum-20060220.01.war Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~continuum/logs/trunk/continuum-build-log-20060220.01.txt

Re: [M2] Dashboard Plugin Plans

2006-02-19 Thread Brett Porter
It would just need to be a common dependency. reporting-api definitely is, but you could easily create a new library for it (and that probably makes more sense). The component definition goes in the same JAR as the class. - Brett Mauro Botelho wrote: > Brett, in order for any plug-in to use the

Re: [M2] Dashboard Plugin Plans

2006-02-19 Thread Mauro Botelho
Brett, in order for any plug-in to use the MetricRegistry, would it have to be declared in the reporting-api? Where would I add the component definition for it? Mauro On 1/24/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This looks good to me at first blush. Please make sure this gets > captu

[maven2 build branches/maven-2.0.x - SUCCESS - checkout] Mon Feb 20 00:30:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-19 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-20060220.003001.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-build-log-20060220.003001.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: [m2] Release archetype plugin?

2006-02-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
Wendy Smoak wrote: [moved from the user list] On 1/30/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I need to release the archetype plugin. I added a parameter to specify the repository where the archetype comes from. Jason, any news on this? I'd like to move the Shale archetype out of the sa

[maven2 build trunk - SUCCESS - checkout] Mon Feb 20 00:00:00 GMT 2006

2006-02-19 Thread continuum
Distribution: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/trunk/m2-20060220.01.tar.gz Log: http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/logs/trunk/m2-build-log-20060220.01.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: jira components

2006-02-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
Brett Porter wrote: I noticed that "artifacts and repositories" is now accompanied by "artifacts", "dependencies" and "deployment" components in MNG. I have to look back at what Natalie suggested but I believe it's supposed to be - artifacts - repositories - dependencies - deployment jvz.

Re: [proposal] adding pre/post phases for all major lifecycle phases

2006-02-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
Brett Porter wrote: This reply grabs bits from everywhere and summarises. John Casey wrote: Hi, I'd like to add pre/post phases for all of the major lifecycle phases that don't already have it. For the record, I'm against this as the solution based on the thread so far. Some basic reasons b

Re: plugin testing

2006-02-19 Thread Jesse McConnell
after reading up on mocks from the links that vincent posted, I am going to take a stab at putting together a minor set of these to work with for a couple of the plugins...just to see how it would work out. Hopefully I can get with vincent a bit tomorrow to make sure I get it close to right the fi

Re: JUnit 4.0

2006-02-19 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I've uploaded it to iBiblio so you can try it On 2/19/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes but It seems that JUnit 4 works only with Java 5 ?? > > It requires Java 5 to compile and annotations for JUnit 4 style >

Re: [ANN] Maven Source Plugin 1.0 for Maven 1.x released

2006-02-19 Thread Brett Porter
Can you also send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Brett Stephane Nicoll wrote: > We are pleased to announce the Maven Source Plugin 1.0 release! > > http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/plugins/source/ > > This plug-in builds an archive of the source code and supports for > further integrati

Re: JUnit 4.0

2006-02-19 Thread Kaare Nilsen
Hi all.. Though i did not test this using surefire (yet), I am almost certain that it would work.. the followng testcode, and notice the inner suite() method. package no.objectware.test.junit4; import junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter; import org.junit.After; import org.junit.AfterClass; imp

[m2] java 5's apt.exe as a compiler option?

2006-02-19 Thread Eddie O'Neil
All-- I'm interested in the status of Java 5 support in Maven, particularly around supporting the JDK's new tool bin/apt.exe which is Sun's extension of javac.exe. I've written an extension of "plexus-compiler-javac" that adds support for "apt.exe" so that annotation processors can be hosted at

[jira] Commented: (MEV-326) Spring 2.0 M2 is missing a POM

2006-02-19 Thread Julien Dubois (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-326?page=comments#action_58981 ] Julien Dubois commented on MEV-326: --- I have linked this issue to MEV-339. I provide there a workaround, by using the Spring 2.0-m2 subprojects, instead of just the main Spring file.

[jira] Updated: (MEV-339) Missing POMs for Spring 2.0-m2

2006-02-19 Thread Julien Dubois (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-339?page=all ] Julien Dubois updated MEV-339: -- Attachment: spring-2.0-m2.zip > Missing POMs for Spring 2.0-m2 > -- > > Key: MEV-339 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ME

[jira] Commented: (MEV-339) Missing POMs for Spring 2.0-m2

2006-02-19 Thread Julien Dubois (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-339?page=comments#action_58979 ] Julien Dubois commented on MEV-339: --- I have my created my own pom.xml files , which are working fine for my project (http://tudu.sf.net). For doing those pom.xml, I have used the link

[jira] Created: (MEV-339) Missing POMs for Spring 2.0-m2

2006-02-19 Thread Julien Dubois (JIRA)
Missing POMs for Spring 2.0-m2 -- Key: MEV-339 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-339 Project: Maven Evangelism Type: Bug Components: Missing POM Reporter: Julien Dubois The pom.xml files are missing for all the 2.0-m2 rel

[ANN] Maven Source Plugin 1.0 for Maven 1.x released

2006-02-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
We are pleased to announce the Maven Source Plugin 1.0 release! http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/plugins/source/ This plug-in builds an archive of the source code and supports for further integration in IDEs. To automatically install the plugin, type the following on a single line: m

Re: maven source plugin to core plugins

2006-02-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Thanks! On 2/19/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stephan, > > The project is created : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSOURCE > You are the project lead (I used your account sni - tell me if you > use another one). > > For the main plugins site, you can redeploy it. When

Re: maven source plugin to core plugins

2006-02-19 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Stephan, The project is created : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSOURCE You are the project lead (I used your account sni - tell me if you use another one). For the main plugins site, you can redeploy it. When you deploy the site of one plugin, maven ask you if you want to deploy the

Re: JUnit 4.0

2006-02-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes but It seems that JUnit 4 works only with Java 5 ?? It requires Java 5 to compile and annotations for JUnit 4 style tests. JUnit 3 style tests are still supported (so you can run your old tests against JUnit 4) and don't requi

Re: maven source plugin to core plugins

2006-02-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Release has been made and web site is deployed: http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/plugins/source/ Before I announce the release to the community, could anyone please create a Jira project on codehaus for the source plugin? Also, I never redeployed the main plugins site so if anyone could