> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: lundi 22 novembre 2004 01:45
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Ading a new tag to ?
>
> > True. I can also run with the offline mode on. But all those are really
> > hacks. I was looking for a
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-264
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
> True. I can also run with the offline mode on. But all those are really
> hacks. I was looking for a more robust solution for m1.
Let's go for a robust solution then: I don't see any reason why we can't do the
in-situ handling for m1 without extra tags.
The reactor has a list of projects: feed
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1514
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
Key:
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dimanche 21 novembre 2004 20:31
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Ading a new tag to ?
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Jason and Michal. I think adding different SNAPSHOT
> repositories (perhaps all
Hi Michal,
> -Original Message-
> From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: lundi 22 novembre 2004 02:47
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Ading a new tag to ?
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> >Hi Maven devs,
> >
> >I think there's a need to allow specifying
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dimanche 21 novembre 2004 15:45
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Ading a new tag to ?
>
> On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 05:14, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi Maven devs,
> >
> >
> > Would this be acce
I would suggest that the new tag could take an URL to specify a location that
is not available in the remote or local repository. I know you can specify some
properties to do that but I would like to have it in the POM.
-Andy
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
I agree with Jason and Michal. I think adding different SNAPSHOT
repositories (perhaps allowing even finer grained control over a
repository by limiting some groups internally, etc), and fixing the
speed problem cover this pretty well, so there is no need for a new tag.
To get it working to
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Maven devs,
I think there's a need to allow specifying when some artifacts are only to
be looked for in the local repository. For example, in a multiproject the
local repository is used to share private artifacts between the subprojects.
These private artifacts are not mean
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-263
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 05:14, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Maven devs,
>
>
> Would this be acceptable for CVS HEAD of m1? Is there something planned
> along these lines for m2?
Your example snippet seems to be all refering to SNAPSHOTs? Are you
looking for something SNAPSHOT in particular? I'm askin
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-263
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
Hi Maven devs,
I think there's a need to allow specifying when some artifacts are only to
be looked for in the local repository. For example, in a multiproject the
local repository is used to share private artifacts between the subprojects.
These private artifacts are not meant to be uploaded to a
14 matches
Mail list logo
