[jira] Updated: (MPCLEAN-4) clean doesn't clean velocity.log.1

2004-10-25 Thread jira
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Shinobu Kawai (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 9:33 PM Comment: Okay, here's the patch to move the Velocity log cleaning to the xdoc plugin. As for the maven.clean.include extension, I think a new issue should be file

cvs commit: maven-plugins/xdoc/xdocs changes.xml properties.xml

2004-10-25 Thread aheritier
aheritier2004/10/25 15:45:53 Modified:xdoc plugin.jelly plugin.properties xdoc/src/plugin-test/test02 maven.xml xdoc/xdocs changes.xml properties.xml Added: xdoc/src/plugin-test/test02 project.properties xdoc/src/plugin-test/test02

[jira] Closed: (MPXDOC-123) a way to copy xml files instead of transforming

2004-10-25 Thread jira
Message: The following issue has been closed. Resolver: Arnaud HERITIER Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 6:45 PM A new property is added : maven.xdoc.xml.copy A comma separated list of patterns to specify xml files to copy from ${maven.docs.src} to ${maven.docs.dest} without to perform a tr

Re: goal to deploy an artifact

2004-10-25 Thread Brett Porter
IF you have a look at jar:deploy, that's exactly what is there :) Cheers, Brett Ryan Schutt wrote: While searching the maven plugins for a goal to automatically upload a created artifact to a repository, I ran across the maven artifact plugin. This plugin seems to have the necessary functionality

goal to deploy an artifact

2004-10-25 Thread Ryan Schutt
While searching the maven plugins for a goal to automatically upload a created artifact to a repository, I ran across the maven artifact plugin. This plugin seems to have the necessary functionality needed for automatically uploading artifacts, and indeed, I can accomplish what I need if I add thi

Re: Time to release Eclipse 1.9?

2004-10-25 Thread Brett Porter
All the other plugin releases except eclipse are done. So after the outstanding JIRA issues on the roadmap. Patches welcome :) Cheers, Brett Arnaud HERITIER wrote: +1 for me. It's better to turn off this feature. Brett, do you have an idea when you'll be able to produce the 1.0.1 release ? Arnaud -

[jira] Created: (MPECLIPSE-55) entry maven.gen.src=${maven.build.dir}/generated-sources ignored

2004-10-25 Thread jira
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPECLIPSE-55 Here is an overview of the issue: - Ke

[jira] Created: (MPECLIPSE-54) maven.gen.src creates entry with trailing com

2004-10-25 Thread jira
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPECLIPSE-54 Here is an overview of the issue: - Ke

Re: Time to release Eclipse 1.9?

2004-10-25 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 for me. It's better to turn off this feature. Brett, do you have an idea when you'll be able to produce the 1.0.1 release ? Arnaud - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Time to release Eclipse 1.9?

2004-10-25 Thread Felipe Leme
+1 for Brett's proposal On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 08:32, Brett Porter wrote: > OTOH, you could do as below and default to off - so the new feature is > there if needed, but still compatible until a better solution can be found. > > What do you think? -

Re: Time to release Eclipse 1.9?

2004-10-25 Thread Brett Porter
Yeah, I think it is really important that users can download a new version and expect things not to break, especially in a "bugfix" release. We don't exactly have a great track record on that count :) If it's a breaker, I'd say we leave it out of 1.0.1 - it can be easily downloaded separately.

RE: Time to release Eclipse 1.9?

2004-10-25 Thread Eric Pugh
MPECLIPSE-53 does need fixing, otherwise we won't be backwards compatible. If we can wait a day or so, I'll see if I can (or anyone else) can think of something smart. Otherwise I'll add a switch to turn on and off including resources, with the default being I guess, on. That will break some proj

[jira] Commented: (MPCLEAN-4) clean doesn't clean velocity.log.1

2004-10-25 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: David Eric Pugh Created: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 5:18 AM Body: Brett does have a valid point. And his point is why I want to supply a generic maven.clean.includes patternset, versus a hardcoded velocity.log.1 file. I agree, th

[jira] Commented: (MPCLEAN-4) clean doesn't clean velocity.log.1

2004-10-25 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Shinobu Kawai Created: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 5:12 AM Body: Don't worry, Velocity will only roll one file, so the patch is sufficient in Velocity's case. B) I read Brett's comment in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPCLEAN-2,

[jira] Commented: (MPCLEAN-4) clean doesn't clean velocity.log.1

2004-10-25 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: David Eric Pugh Created: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 4:51 AM Body: While your patch would work for velocity.log.1, it won't work for velocity.log.2 or name your extra artifact. If you are interested, look at how other plugins imp