RE: [jira] Closed: (MAVENPROXY-14) Crash at startup with missing proxy.list

2004-09-19 Thread Jörg Schaible
Also for the original case, if no proxy.list is defined at all ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sunday, September 19, 2004 4:40 AM: > Message: > >The following issue has been closed. > >Resolver: Ben Walding >Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 10:39 PM > > Rolled back to jetty 5.0.RC2. Works

[jira] Commented: (MAVENPROXY-13) SNAPSHOT artifacts are cached

2004-09-19 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Joerg Schaible Created: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 2:32 AM Body: Just to complete the records for this issue: I've build the maven-1.0 branch from CVS and the exception in the logfile of maven-proxy has gone, but it still does not

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1388) Use the generated model reader being used in the maven 2.x code.

2004-09-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 23:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The following comment has been added to this issue: > > Author: dion gillard > Created: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:07 PM >Body: > Wow this sure is ugly. > > Code mixed with class definitions in XML. Is there some discussion on why

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1388) Use the generated model reader being used in the maven 2.x code.

2004-09-19 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: dion gillard Created: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:07 PM Body: Wow this sure is ugly. Code mixed with class definitions in XML. Is there some discussion on why this has ended up in an XML file instead of javadoc attributes or why

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1446) Dependencies with identical artifactId, but different types

2004-09-19 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Carlos Sanchez Created: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 2:45 PM Body: As I commented in MAVEN-1087, quoting Trygve: The type is not going to be a part of the dependency id in maven 2 so it should not become a part in maven 1 either. --

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1087) Dependency type should participate in equals() and hashcode()

2004-09-19 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Dan Greening Created: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:59 AM Body: I appreciate the hints, but given Carlos' claim that this will never make it into the main source code I'm not going to invest more time into this patch (or fixes to o

[jira] Work Started: (MAVEN-1388) Use the generated model reader being used in the maven 2.x code.

2004-09-19 Thread jira
Message: Work on this issue has been started by Brett Porter (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1388 Here is an overview of the issue:

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1446) Dependencies with identical artifactId, but different types

2004-09-19 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Felipe Leme Created: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:21 AM Body: I agree with Brett, specially because changing the artifact name doesn't work - will still use the name defined by the POM