Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Brett Porter
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 1:04 AM
see FAQ
http://maven.apache.org/faq.html#jelly-site-error
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewI
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPXDOC-86
Here is an overview of the issue:
brett 2004/03/18 21:03:12
Modified:ear project.xml
Log:
fix version tag
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +5 -7 maven-plugins/ear/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/maven
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 20:15:16
Modified:
maven-plugins/maven-resources-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin
ResourcesPlugin.java
Log:
remove debug info
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -5
maven-components/maven-plugins/maven-resources-p
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 20:13:23
Log:
o the source directory now follows the standard layout
o plugin tests added for the 4 supported flavours of POJOs
Status:
Vendor Tag: APACHE
Release Tags: INIT
N maven-components/maven-core/.cvsignore
N maven-components/maven-core/REA
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 20:11:11
Modified:maven-plugins/maven-compiler-plugin project.xml
maven-plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin
CompilerPlugin.java
maven-plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/src/main/resources
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 20:09:32
Modified:
maven-plugins/maven-resources-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin
ResourcesPlugin.java
Log:
o make sure we account for times when we have resources entries like:
src/main/resource
We want
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Brett Porter
Created: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:59 PM
Body:
I don't think a new uberjar release blocks RC2
-
View this comment:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secu
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Brett Porter (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:59 PM
Changes:
assignee changed to Brett Porter
Fix Version changed to 1.0-rc2
-
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Nick Minutello
Created: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 7:47 PM
Body:
Hmmm. This seems to have been dealt with promptly...
Should the historical report be a new maven report? Should it be a plugin on its own?
---
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Vincent Massol
Created: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 5:17 PM
Body:
Just tried latest Maven rc2 from HEAD and latest Cactus plugin from HEAD on my windows
machine and it works fine too.
hi-
here are a few comments on why ive added that thingy.
first let me say i dont actually think it would be a nice solution (as i
pointed it in the patch). i also agree that entities stuff are
error-prone especially in a multiproject context (i have indeed
experimented inconsistent behaviou
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Joerg Schaible
Created: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 4:19 PM
Body:
The patch of MPUBERJAR-4 would bring the plugin' functionality in-line with the other
"wrapping" plugins like war and ear.
---
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:28:44
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/resources/org/apache/maven/plugin - New
directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:28:12
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/resources/org/apache/maven - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:27:46
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/resources/org/apache - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:20:13
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/resources/org - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:15:52
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/plugin - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:09:53
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/java/org/apache/maven - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:09:36
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/java/org/apache - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:09:05
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/java/org - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:07:37
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/resources - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:07:37
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/java - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2004/03/18 10:07:23
maven-components/maven-model/src/test - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 06:18, Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> Maczka Michal wrote:
>
> >So what I am saying is that we should be only merging POMs not arbitrary XML
> >
> >
> Very good point. I personaly hate SGML entities mockery with all my
> heart - it's so ugly and so fragile! As for explicit inclus
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 04:44, Maczka Michal wrote:
> Hi Jason!
>
> I think that for that particular use case which is described here it
> would be just simpler handle via what you are calling "group dependenies".
Possibly :-) I didn't really look that closely I just figured I might as
well get Gi
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Arnaud HERITIER
Created: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 7:01 AM
Body:
MAVEN-1202 : I don't know if it is only a plugin problem ?
-
View this comment:
http://jira.cod
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Arnaud HERITIER (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 6:56 AM
Changes:
Attachment changed to build-bootstrap-jdk1.3.log
-
For a full histor
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-1202
Here is an overview of the issue:
---
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPLINKCHECK-11
Here is an overview of the issue:
---
Maczka Michal wrote:
So what I am saying is that we should be only merging POMs not arbitrary XML
Very good point. I personaly hate SGML entities mockery with all my
heart - it's so ugly and so fragile! As for explicit inclusion of XML
bits, problems arise when they are used acorss multiple p
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Brett Porter
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 5:39 AM
tested on hogshead. Works.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPXDOC-84
Here i
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Brett Porter
Created: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 5:21 AM
Body:
but file:// break windows
the other references in the file are just file: so I've changed it to that.
will test tomorrow on a linux box and close if fixed
brett 2004/03/18 02:08:54
Modified:xdoc plugin.jelly
Log:
PR: MPXDOC-84
fix file: URL
Revision ChangesPath
1.56 +1 -1 maven-plugins/xdoc/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.jelly
===
RCS fil
Hi Jason!
I think that for that particular use case which is described here it
would be just simpler handle via what you are calling "group dependenies".
It means that we can have a special dependency type (e.g.
group) rather then use complex XML structures/aliases.
This dependenecy type means: r
35 matches
Mail list logo
