dion2004/01/07 22:57:23
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH AddPathTag.java
Log:
Code cleanup:
Remove unused import
Change parameter names to something more descriptive
Revision ChangesPath
No
dion2004/01/07 22:45:22
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/cli Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH App.java
Log:
Code cleanup:
- shorten doMain method
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.37.4.7 +88 -59maven/src/java/org/apac
dion2004/01/07 21:25:51
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/repository Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
AbstractArtifact.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.22.4.1 +5 -2 maven/
dion2004/01/07 21:23:58
Modified:jalopy project.xml
Log:
Fix bad encoding
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +3 -3 maven-plugins/jalopy/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/m
dion2004/01/07 21:20:08
Modified:site project.xml
Log:
Fix bad encoding
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +3 -3 maven-plugins/site/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/mav
jvanzyl 2004/01/07 21:15:34
Added: maven-core README.txt
Log:
a little warning
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 maven-components/maven-core/README.txt
Index: README.txt
===
Danger Will Rob
dion2004/01/07 21:14:38
Modified:site/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
- Remove telnet server dependency for ftp deployment
- Thanks to Rajeev Kaul
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +1 -0 maven-plugins/site/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
===
dion2004/01/07 21:13:55
Modified:site plugin.jelly project.xml
Log:
- Remove telnet server dependency for ftp deployment
- Thanks to Rajeev Kaul
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +1 -18 maven-plugins/site/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.jelly
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Mike Melia
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:25 PM
Body:
This may be related to issue 1069 ->
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-1069
-
V
dion2004/01/07 20:42:40
Modified:test/xdocs properties.xml changes.xml
test plugin.jelly project.xml plugin.properties
Log:
Added maven.junit.format property that defaults to brief.
Changed formatters to use maven.junit.usefile consistently.
jvanzyl 2004/01/07 20:41:23
Modified:maven-core bootstrap.sh
Log:
o let the whole bootstrap go
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +0 -2 maven-components/maven-core/bootstrap.sh
Index: bootstrap.sh
===
jvanzyl 2004/01/07 20:29:22
Log:
maven-core component
Status:
Vendor Tag: APACHE
Release Tags: MCORE_INIT
N maven-components/maven-core/.cvsignore
N maven-components/maven-core/bootstrap.sh
N maven-components/maven-core/maven.xml
N maven-components/maven-core/proje
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPSTATCVS-7
Here is an overview of the issue:
dion2004/01/07 16:53:49
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/plugin Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
GoalToJellyScriptHousingMapper.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.3.4.3 +33 -27
dion2004/01/07 16:35:34
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/werkz Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH MavenGoalTag.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.4.3 +2 -2
mav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gillie, on MPECLIPSE-2, the last comment there was that the patch no
longer applied, as it had been refactored, but it should be easy enough to
create a new patch.
Want to give it a go?
dion,
although i have read the comments ben made at that time i never had the
tim
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: dion gillard
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 6:41 PM
Patch applied today.Fixed in v1.4 of the plugin
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?
dion2004/01/07 16:26:10
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/project Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
Build.java BaseObject.java ArtifactType.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.24.4.
dion2004/01/07 16:24:53
Modified:javadoc/xdocs changes.xml
javadoc plugin.jelly
Log:
Apply MPJAVADOC-6
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +4 -1 maven-plugins/javadoc/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
=
dion2004/01/07 16:12:33
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
BaseTagSupport.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.8.4.1 +10 -1 maven/sr
Gillie, on MPECLIPSE-2, the last comment there was that the patch no
longer applied, as it had been refactored, but it should be easy enough to
create a new patch.
Want to give it a go?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Eddie Post" <[EMAI
dion2004/01/07 16:07:46
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/jeez Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH TargetTag.java JeezTagLibrary.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.10.1
dion2004/01/07 15:14:09
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH InputTag.java UserCheck.java
ReactorTag.java ConcatTag.java
SnapshotSignature.java AddPathTag.java
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Brett Porter (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 5:28 PM
Changes:
Fix Version changed to 1.1
-
For a full history of the issue, see:
ht
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Brett Porter
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 5:27 PM
thanks. Done
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPA-10
Here is an overview of
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVENUPLOAD-53
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
I've been thinking about this and would like to sum up:
- need multiple branches as well. Something for later, but in the same way
id is unique by groupId:artifactId:type, I think it actually gets added to
version along the lines of version:branch:snapshot.
- I don't think editing currentVersion
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Sean Timm
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 3:57 PM
Body:
I'm seeing this same error message when attempting to use the dashboard report during
a multiproject:site build...I believe the dashboard uses the reactor, so this is
prob
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Jason Horne (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 2:35 PM
Comment:
Attached a patch file which performs this fix
Changes:
Attachment changed to javadoc.plugin.patch
---
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Vincent Massol
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 2:11 PM
Already implemented in plugin CVS.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPCHECK
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Jason Horne
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 2:11 PM
Body:
The code has changed slightly since this was originally reported, but the bug remains.
This:
...ne
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPA-11
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Jason van Zyl
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 1:11 PM
Body:
Brett, you now have the privs to create projects and shuffle the issues around.
-
View the issue:
> I am trying to find about the best practices related to
> SNAPSHOT dependencies. More and more I think about them I
> find that some things are rather not clear and quite inconsistent.
>
> There is one misleading thing: We often find in POMs (maven,
> maven plugins do that):
>
>
> 3
> m
Thanks Gilles,
H, but do you know where I can get some nice information how to perform
junit testing correctly with Maven (can't find it 123) ?
To me it's unclear how I build my test classes such that I can use them in
my build for other test classes in another subproject ?
Regards,
Ed Bra
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPPMD-6
Here is an overview of the issue:
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPCHECKSTYLE-13
Here is an overview of the issue:
dion2004/01/07 08:44:52
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/cli Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
CLIManager.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.12.4.1 +1 -1 maven/src/java/org/
dion2004/01/07 08:44:18
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/cli Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH App.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.37.4.6 +2 -2 maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/cli/App.java
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:45, Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > - include a pointer to an md5 file for the bundle inside the bundle and
> > the location must be a public location on the project's site so
> > obviously a developer must have access to this site.
> >
> > - push the b
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:32, John Casey wrote:
> Is it a little naive to assume that active development can only take
> place on one branch at a time?
I'm not assuming that at all, I'm telling you what a SNAPSHOT was
originally defined as. I said before that the notion of a SNAPSHOT may
need to be
dion2004/01/07 08:28:49
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
NoGoalException.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.4.4.1 +2 -2 maven/src/java/org
dion2004/01/07 08:28:03
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
MavenUtils.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.107.4.6 +7 -7 maven/src/java/org/apac
dion2004/01/07 08:25:46
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
GoalException.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.10.1 +2 -2 maven/src/java/org/a
dion2004/01/07 08:24:43
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
DependencyClasspathBuilder.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.13.4.1 +3 -3 maven/s
dion2004/01/07 08:23:25
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
ArtifactListBuilder.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.14.4.1 +2 -2 maven/src/java
Eddie Post wrote on Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:54 PM:
[snip]
> How is this code handled ? Will it be added to a new version
> of this plugin
> ??
[snip]
Just open an issue here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10352
Regards,
Jörg
-
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Emmanuel Venisse
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:27 AM
Fixed by Dion
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPJNLP-3
Here is an ove
dion2004/01/07 08:12:34
Modified:.Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH project.xml
Log:
Remove unneeded dependency
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.317.4.8 +1 -7 maven/project.xml
Index: project.xml
==
dion2004/01/07 08:10:50
Removed: src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
DefaultProjectMarshaller.java
DefaultProjectUnmarshaller.java
Log:
Remove unused classes
-
dion2004/01/07 08:03:55
Modified:jnlp plugin.jelly
Log:
Fix missing namespace
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +1 -0 maven-plugins/jnlp/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.jelly
===
RCS file: /home
Hellu,
I had some problems getting the eclipse plugin to work well with the Junit
syntax.
I noticed that the eclipse plugin work with the following syntax in the
project.xml:
${basedir}/src/test
However, I noticed in the maven manual that you should use (I think the
other is depri
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> - include a pointer to an md5 file for the bundle inside the bundle and
> the location must be a public location on the project's site so
> obviously a developer must have access to this site.
>
> - push the bundle to a machine where the md5 file for the bundle can be
> ret
> > maven jar:install (will put maven-1.1-SNAPSHOT to repository)
>
> That should probably be altered. That really shouldn't go into the
> repository.
>
[...]
> > Maybe indeed it is reasonable to lock usage of snapshot to
> one branch (like
> > 1.0-SNAPSHOT, 1.1-SNAPSHOT)?
>
> This was al
dion2004/01/07 07:33:56
Modified:src/bootstrap/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
Dependency.java BootstrapTask.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.3.10.1 +2 -2
Is it a little naive to assume that active development can only take
place on one branch at a time? It seems to me that this is what we
assume when we dictate that we can only have a single SNAPSHOT version
of code out there. In fact, I have worked on projects wherein we were
testing bugfixes on o
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Emmanuel Venisse
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 9:48 AM
Body:
I have no time for the moment. I show it asap.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secur
dion2004/01/07 07:29:18
Added: src/bootstrap/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
package.html
Log:
Add package documentation
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.1 +10 -0 maven/sr
dion2004/01/07 07:28:26
Modified:src/bootstrap/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
BootstrapPomParser.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.5.10.3 +6 -6 maven/src/
dion2004/01/07 07:26:22
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/jelly/tags/maven Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH PropertyTag.java
Log:
Code cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.4.2.3 +0 -4
mave
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
maven/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/utilEnhancedStringTokenizerTest.java
> On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:56, [EMA
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/01/2004 01:57:34 AM:
> On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/01/2004 09:09:01 AM:
> >
> > [snip]
> > > run from the touchstone or the bootstrap isn't acceptable. It's
silly to
> > > ha
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/01/2004 02:01:27 AM:
> On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dion2004/01/07 06:56:49
> >
> > Modified:src/test/java/org/apache/maven/util Tag:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> > EnhancedStringTokenizerTest.
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:29, Maczka Michal wrote:
> I am trying to find about the best practices related to SNAPSHOT
> dependencies.
> More and more I think about them I find that some things are rather not
> clear and quite inconsistent.
>
> There is one misleading thing: We often find in POMs (m
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dion2004/01/07 06:56:49
>
> Modified:src/test/java/org/apache/maven/util Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
> EnhancedStringTokenizerTest.java
> Log:
> Code cleanup
> - Note: This class is GPL licensed!
Who put
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/01/2004 08:36:28 AM:
>
> > Currently there is no real way to distinguish between a public property
> > and a private one even though in most cases they are almost always
> > public.
>
> Aren't pr
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/01/2004 09:09:01 AM:
>
> [snip]
> > run from the touchstone or the bootstrap isn't acceptable. It's silly to
> > have to bootstrap in order to test a plugin.
>
> You do know that you don't need t
dion2004/01/07 06:56:49
Modified:src/test/java/org/apache/maven/util Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
EnhancedStringTokenizerTest.java
Log:
Code cleanup
- Note: This class is GPL licensed!
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
I am trying to find about the best practices related to SNAPSHOT
dependencies.
More and more I think about them I find that some things are rather not
clear and quite inconsistent.
There is one misleading thing: We often find in POMs (maven, maven plugins
do that):
3
maven
Maven
1.1-SNAP
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/01/2004 08:36:28 AM:
> Currently there is no real way to distinguish between a public property
> and a private one even though in most cases they are almost always
> public.
Aren't properties in a plugin's project.properties not overrideable?
--
dIon
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/01/2004 09:09:01 AM:
[snip]
> run from the touchstone or the bootstrap isn't acceptable. It's silly to
> have to bootstrap in order to test a plugin.
You do know that you don't need to bootstrap to run plugin:test, right?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Co
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Joerg Schaible
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 8:06 AM
Body:
Hi Emmanuel,
I recognized that you've updated the jelly script ... close, but no cigar. I still
have an exception although it is something different:
=== snip ==
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Joerg Schaible
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 6:58 AM
Body:
I use the current CVS versions for maven (MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH) and maven-plugins (HEAD).
-
View the iss
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Emmanuel Venisse
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 6:32 AM
Body:
I modify it when I'll migrate changelog plugin and scm plugin to maven-scm. With
maven-scm, it's automatic.
-
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Emmanuel Venisse
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 6:29 AM
Body:
What's your jnlp plugin version? From CVS? After or before maven:property use?
-
View the issue:
evenisse2004/01/07 04:10:10
Modified:jnlp project.xml
jnlp/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Jason's changes are for a new plugin version
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +1 -1 maven-plugins/jnlp/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
evenisse2004/01/07 04:09:12
Modified:jnlp plugin.jelly
Log:
Remove extra character
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +1 -1 maven-plugins/jnlp/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.jelly
===
RCS file: /hom
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPJNLP-3
Here is an overview of the issue:
---
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Joerg Schaible
Created: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 4:48 AM
Body:
Hi Vincent,
running with Maven 1.0-SNAPSHOT I stall have an exceotion although the .classpath and
.project is generated properly:
= snip ==
[1] [EMA
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Emmanuel Boudrant (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 3:48 AM
Comment:
Here the full files : ArtifactDeployer.java, DefaultArtifactDeployer.java,
DeployBean.java.
Modification : add an optionnal extension property in Depl
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-1110
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
81 matches
Mail list logo
