brett 2004/01/05 20:58:52
Modified:maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model Model.java
maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model ModelTest.java
Log:
add more legacy to model.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +74 -4
maven-components/maven-model/src
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Jeff Brekke (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:31 PM
Comment:
Here's the changes.
Changes:
Attachment changed to patch.diff
-
For
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPANT-8
Here is an overview of the issue:
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Brett Porter
Created: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 9:31 PM
Body:
I think that would work. Would be good to use a "known to work" version instead of
SNAPSHOT as there is currently an annoying alert from dashboard as it attempts to
dow
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 9:27 PM
Body:
Can we just add a dependency on maven-clover-plugin-SNAPSHOT?
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehau
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/01/2004 11:35:42 AM:
> > > Anyway, I'm ok with the change, but we should probably do
> > it properly.
> > I'm
> >
> > Can you expand on 'do it properly'?
>
> I would think we can push the optional JARs out to the plugins and make
> MAVEN_HOME/lib a b
- Original Message -
From: "Rajeev Kaul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: ftp deployment
> I don't know what happened, but I will send the files again.
>
> Rajeev
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[
> My call was that there would be almost no plugins written using these
> tasks. I googled on maven plugin and the appropriate task
> before deciding.
Fair enough.
>
> > Anyway, I'm ok with the change, but we should probably do
> it properly.
> I'm
>
> Can you expand on 'do it properly'?
I
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/01/2004 09:30:28 AM:
> If that's the case, can we assume that some tasks are missing where
people
> might expect them to be there?
Yes, if people were using:
- the nextrexxc task
- the stylebook task
- the VisualAge for Java ta
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 16:39, Michael A Melia wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> I checked on irc a few times but was unable to catch up with you. I am
> very keen to implement transitive dependencies - there is way too much
> duplication in my poms right now and they are looking very messy.
Just send me a mes
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 17:27, Brett Porter wrote:
> I don't think we want to introduce a dependency on maven-scm for
> maven-model. I'd prefer that the users of these functions just started using
> maven-scm directly and these can get tossed. Its just there for current code
> compatibility.
The mod
If that's the case, can we assume that some tasks are missing where people
might expect them to be there?
Anyway, I'm ok with the change, but we should probably do it properly. I'm
happy to break compatibility in this case and not include any optional tasks
and push them out to the individual plug
I don't think we want to introduce a dependency on maven-scm for
maven-model. I'd prefer that the users of these functions just started using
maven-scm directly and these can get tossed. Its just there for current code
compatibility.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Venisse [
The problem with these components is that the beans don't really get
exercised inside this component, so you can really assess the coverage until
you run it as part of, say, maven-model-tools.
As it ended up, only 2 getter/setter tests were really needed, as some more
complex tests for artifact's
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael A Melia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:39 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Installed POMS not interpolated
>
>
> Hi Jason,
> I checked on irc a few times but was unable to catch up with you. I am
> very keen
Hi Jason,
I checked on irc a few times but was unable to catch up with you. I am
very keen to implement transitive dependencies - there is way too much
duplication in my poms right now and they are looking very messy.
I understand that you are probably busy with 1.0 right now but if you have
alr
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
formally limit i
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 08:54, Jeffrey D. Brekke wrote:
> Thinking along the lines of acceptance/customer tests...
>
> If what you're really wanting to test is that the generated xml
> matches some golden xml file, ala diff of two xml files, xmlunit is
> the best I've found.
Cool, I will look into
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 02:44, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I can think of 2 ways for doing this:
>
> - xmlunit :-)
Yah, that seems to be the front runner.
> - using directly Jelly (the xml taglib) as I've done in several plugin
> tests. It won't test the full generated XML (is that nece
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 07:43, Ben Walding wrote:
> I don't necessarily agree that getters and setters should be tested
> explicitly.
As far as code and development go in general I don't think there is ever
a downside in being explicit. Who knows how the code will evolve and who
knows what will
Thinking along the lines of acceptance/customer tests...
If what you're really wanting to test is that the generated xml
matches some golden xml file, ala diff of two xml files, xmlunit is
the best I've found.
I've also just read the xml into domain objects and checked those and
actually used jr
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brett 2004/01/04 13:57:53
Modified:maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model
DependencyTest.java
Log:
improve testing, remove stuff "to simple to fail"
add ASL
What does "too
> I'm very much interested in this plugin. Could you perhaps make it
> available by posting it to the list.
>
> * Janne Kario
Hi Janne, sorry for the late answer. Please send my a email in private. Than
I will send you the plugin. I dont know if it is a good idea to send the
plugin to the list be
dion2004/01/05 01:57:30
Modified:struts/xdocs changes.xml
struts project.xml
Log:
- Remove unneeded ant dependency.
- plugin:test is non-existent
- standalone runs succeed
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +5 -0 maven-plugins/struts/xdocs/change
Why you don't use directly maven-scm in this deprecated methods?
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 9:54 AM
Subject: cvs commit:
maven-components/maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model Repository.java
> br
brett 2004/01/05 00:56:13
Modified:maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model
ResourceTest.java
Log:
moved common code to pattern set
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +22 -15
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model/Resourc
brett 2004/01/05 00:54:42
Modified:maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model Repository.java
Log:
add legacy (now deprecated) functions for compatibility
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +172 -3
maven-components/maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model/Repository
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: dion gillard
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 3:09 AM
I've done this today, and 'converted' some plugins across.
All seems to be ok.
-
View the issue:
http://jira
brett 2004/01/05 00:52:53
Modified:maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model Resource.java
UnitTest.java
Added: maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model PatternSet.java
maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model
brett 2004/01/05 00:48:09
Modified:maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model
DependencyTest.java
Log:
additional tests
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +50 -1
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model/DependencyTest.java
brett 2004/01/05 00:46:23
Modified:maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model Dependency.java
Log:
remove old function that is not used, fix bug for getProperty where none were added.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -13
maven-components/maven-model/src/java/org/
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Ramon Casha
Created: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 2:51 AM
Body:
Ant 1.6 might introduce problems, but 1.5.4 shouldn't. Thing is, 1.5.3 is KNOWN to be
incompatible with some of JDK 1.4's tools. If we leave this until 1.1 we'd be
relea
Hi Jason,
I can think of 2 ways for doing this:
- xmlunit :-)
- using directly Jelly (the xml taglib) as I've done in several plugin
tests. It won't test the full generated XML (is that necessary? I don't
think so) but only the "important" parts.
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Ja
33 matches
Mail list logo