I'll try and catch up with you on irc and we can discuss further.
__
Mike Melia
ThoughtWorks Inc.
http://www.thoughtworks.com
mobile: +61 0421 581 959
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/01/2004 03:23 PM
Please respond to "Maven Developers List"
To: Mav
dion2004/01/04 22:04:52
Modified:site/xdocs changes.xml
site project.xml
Log:
- Remove unneeded ant dependency.
- plugin:test is non-existent
- standalone runs succeed
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -0 maven-plugins/site/xdocs/changes.xm
dion2004/01/04 21:59:05
Modified:xdoc/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Document change
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +3 -0 maven-plugins/xdoc/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
===
RCS file: /home/
dion2004/01/04 21:53:52
Modified:xdoc project.xml
Log:
- Remove unneeded ant and grant dependencies.
- plugin:test succeeds
- standalone run succeeds
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +0 -13 maven-plugins/xdoc/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 03:50:17 PM:
> On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:45:13 PM:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > dion2004/01/04 19:27:17
dion2004/01/04 21:05:06
Modified:runner/xdocs changes.xml
runner project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +0 -5 maven-plugins/runner/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
==
dion2004/01/04 21:03:18
Modified:perforce project.xml
perforce/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +2 -2 maven-plugins/perforce/project.xml
Index: project.xml
dion2004/01/04 21:02:23
Modified:site/xdocs changes.xml
site project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +0 -3 maven-plugins/site/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
==
dion2004/01/04 21:01:30
Modified:struts/xdocs changes.xml
struts project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +0 -5 maven-plugins/struts/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
==
dion2004/01/04 21:00:28
Modified:docbook project.xml
docbook/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +2 -2 maven-plugins/docbook/project.xml
Index: project.xml
==
dion2004/01/04 20:59:11
Modified:simian project.xml
simian/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -1 maven-plugins/simian/project.xml
Index: project.xml
dion2004/01/04 20:58:23
Modified:xdoc/xdocs changes.xml
xdoc project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +0 -3 maven-plugins/xdoc/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
==
dion2004/01/04 20:57:22
Modified:codeswitcher project.xml
codeswitcher/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +2 -2 maven-plugins/codeswitcher/project.xml
Index: projec
dion2004/01/04 20:56:34
Modified:jxr/xdocs changes.xml
jxr project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +0 -3 maven-plugins/jxr/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
dion2004/01/04 20:55:46
Modified:dist/xdocs changes.xml
dist project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +0 -3 maven-plugins/dist/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
==
dion2004/01/04 20:54:41
Modified:hibernate/xdocs changes.xml
hibernate project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +0 -3 maven-plugins/hibernate/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.x
dion2004/01/04 20:53:34
Modified:changelog project.xml
changelog/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +1 -1 maven-plugins/changelog/project.xml
Index: project.xml
=
dion2004/01/04 20:52:44
Modified:j2ee/xdocs changes.xml
j2ee project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +0 -5 maven-plugins/j2ee/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
==
dion2004/01/04 20:51:51
Modified:webserver project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -1 maven-plugins/webserver/project.xml
Index: project.xml
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:45:13 PM:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > dion2004/01/04 19:27:17
> >
> > -1 unless you have tested every plugin that you've changed and have
dion2004/01/04 20:50:10
Modified:javadoc/xdocs changes.xml
javadoc project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +0 -3 maven-plugins/javadoc/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
dion2004/01/04 20:49:05
Modified:jalopy project.xml
jalopy/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +5 -5 maven-plugins/jalopy/project.xml
Index: project.xml
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dion2004/01/04 20:42:11
>
> Modified:summit project.xml
>summit/xdocs changes.xml
> Log:
> Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
I will start trying to write as many tests as I can to
dion2004/01/04 20:47:52
Modified:aspectwerkz/xdocs changes.xml
aspectwerkz project.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +0 -3 maven-plugins/aspectwerkz/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: cha
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about the last one, it slipped away on me.
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:52:00 PM:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 17:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I'm talking about stuff in the 1.0 codebase.
> >
> > What
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:45:13 PM:
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dion2004/01/04 19:27:17
>
> -1 unless you have tested every plugin that you've changed and have
> tested it. If so then I withhold my -1. If all the plugins are a
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:46:15 PM:
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:26, Brett Porter wrote:
> > That dependency list looks scary - is it really all needed?
>
> Yes, I agree that list of deps add while we are trying to get something
> called 1.0 out the door is a little o
dion2004/01/04 20:46:29
Modified:latexproject.xml
latex/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +2 -2 maven-plugins/latex/project.xml
Index: project.xml
==
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:52:00 PM:
>
> > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 17:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I'm talking about stuff in the 1.0 codebase.
> >
> > What about it? There's nothing in JIRA about it and the
dion2004/01/04 20:43:31
Modified:appserver project.xml
appserver/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +2 -2 maven-plugins/appserver/project.xml
Index: project.xml
=
dion2004/01/04 20:42:31
Modified:antlr/xdocs changes.xml
antlrproject.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +0 -3 maven-plugins/antlr/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
dion2004/01/04 20:42:11
Modified:summit project.xml
summit/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Rolling back ant 1.6 change until someone wants to test it.
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +2 -2 maven-plugins/summit/project.xml
Index: project.xml
Not that I know of. I figure it's either eclipse or the UTF-8 encoding...
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:52:07 PM:
> Weren't some entities used somewhere else to avoid this?
>
> > -
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:52:00 PM:
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 17:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm talking about stuff in the 1.0 codebase.
>
> What about it? There's nothing in JIRA about it and the XSD references
> contactDetails and there doesn't appear to be an
Howdy,
I know that XmlUnit exists but does anyone have any recommendations for
xml unit testing tools? A lot of the plugins generate xml and I want to
improve the testing across the plugins so I figure with a good xml unit
testing tool I can probably make a start at plugin tests for many of the
pl
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 23:09, Michael A Melia wrote:
> > I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> > would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
> > dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
> > formally limit if possibl
> I think extension from the local repository solves this problem, but I
> would still like to know if you are using interpolation within the
> dependnecy elements themselves as that is something I would like to
> formally limit if possible.
Yes, I am using properties for version numbers. e.g. ${r
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 15:10, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> OK, send me your runner and I'll integrate it.
http://www.apache.org/~jvanzyl/test-stuff.tgz
That contains two builds, one for the test plugin which bootstraps the
test-runner with an isolated classloader. You probably only need to use
th
I'll take a look and try again later. Very odd - should work.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004 3:11 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven/src/java/org/apache/maven
> MavenConstants.ja va
>
>
I was just looking at that this morning - it is one of the incosistencies
between maven-model and maven-1.0/.../project
I agree though, roles only make sense for developers. I think timezone is
probably only practically used for developers, so we can cut contribs to
just name/email.
- Brett
> --
I couldn't bootstrap with this change in place.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:25:47 PM:
> Where did you get that? I was able to run touchstone with this in place
via
> maven maven:
All I've done is move to Ant 1.6. From my testing, bootstrap and plugin
tests all work fine, as do the basic site gen.
Looks like eclipse screwed the file :-(
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:26:06 PM:
> That dependency list looks scary - is it really all needed?
Short answer, no.
It was my first cut at all the stuff that used to be in ant-optional.jar,
after removing all that I know for sure we don't need.
--
dIon Gillard, Mult
Weren't some entities used somewhere else to avoid this?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004 2:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: maven-plugins/jalopy project.xml
>
>
> dion2004/01/04 19:50:24
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 17:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm talking about stuff in the 1.0 codebase.
What about it? There's nothing in JIRA about it and the XSD references
contactDetails and there doesn't appear to be any object that references
that. I removed it because it was the only plugin tha
dion2004/01/04 19:50:24
Modified:jalopy project.xml
Log:
Fix bad eclipse screwage
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +3 -3 maven-plugins/jalopy/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /ho
I'm actually skeptical that all those ant dependencies are even necessary?
I'd hazard a guess several have included simply on the basis of
cut-and-paste from something else.
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:26, Brett Porter wrote:
> That dependency list looks scary - is it really all needed?
Yes, I agree that list of deps add while we are trying to get something
called 1.0 out the door is a little out of line.
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROT
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dion2004/01/04 19:27:17
-1 unless you have tested every plugin that you've changed and have
tested it. If so then I withhold my -1. If all the plugins are actually
fine then fine.
> Modified:summit project.xml
>
dion2004/01/04 19:43:13
Modified:summit project.xml
hibernate/xdocs changes.xml
appserver project.xml
antlr/xdocs changes.xml
latexproject.xml
codeswitcher/xdocs changes.xml
site/xdocs cha
Is this compatible with previous releases (RC1)?
Also, you've screwed up some text in jalopy, see below.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004 2:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: maven-plugins/r
Message:
The following issue has been reopened.
Reopener: Brett Porter
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 9:42 PM
patch was backed out by dion on branch
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAV
dion2004/01/04 19:27:17
Modified:summit project.xml
appserver project.xml
latexproject.xml
aspectwerkz project.xml
jalopy project.xml
javadoc project.xml
webserver project.xml
That dependency list looks scary - is it really all needed?
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: maven/src/bin forehead.conf
>
>
> dion2004/01/04 19
Where did you get that? I was able to run touchstone with this in place via
maven maven:jar-install
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004 2:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: maven/src/java/org/ap
dion2004/01/04 19:24:06
Modified:.Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH project.xml
src/bin Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH forehead.conf
Log:
- Upgrade to Ant 1.6
- Use commons-grant-1.0-beta5 for ant 1.6 support
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
N
dion2004/01/04 19:20:06
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven Tag: MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH
MavenConstants.java
Log:
Back out previous change adding '/' to default and driver.properties, as it is
causing an NPE
Revision ChangesPath
No r
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 17:43, Brett Porter wrote:
> Fair point. I'll return them later.
Much appreciated. I only say it because I have screwed up
getters/setters inadvertently and then spent half an hours wondering why
something was failing.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [
Fair point. I'll return them later.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004 9:15 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: cvs commit:
> maven-components/maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model
> DependencyTest.java
>
I'm talking about stuff in the 1.0 codebase.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 01:40:05 AM:
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Contributor v1.8 has roles and orga
Jelly.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Nathan Coast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 08:17:13 AM:
> Hi,
>
> There's a misleading error message given when the set method of a custom
> tag class throws a RuntimeException. Should I
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 16:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> brett 2004/01/04 13:57:53
>
> Modified:maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model
> DependencyTest.java
> Log:
> improve testing, remove stuff "to simple to fail"
> add ASL
What does "too simple to
brett 2004/01/04 13:58:09
Modified:maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model BranchTest.java
BuildTest.java ContributorTest.java
DeveloperTest.java LicenseTest.java
MailingListTest.java ModelTest.java
brett 2004/01/04 13:57:53
Modified:maven-model/src/test/org/apache/maven/model
DependencyTest.java
Log:
improve testing, remove stuff "to simple to fail"
add ASL
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +143 -36
maven-components/maven-model/src/test/o
brett 2004/01/04 13:57:15
Modified:maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model Contributor.java
Log:
typo
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2
maven-components/maven-model/src/java/org/apache/maven/model/Contributor.java
Index: Contributor.java
Hi,
There's a misleading error message given when the set method of a custom
tag class throws a RuntimeException. Should I report this as a jelly
bug or a maven bug?
cheers
Nathan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Maven Mboot
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 10:54, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, I want to add it, because with Maven, we r
On Sat, 2004-01-03 at 18:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lots of reasons. One being the sheer amount of spam I get from web
> collected email addresses.
>
> As far as author tags promoting code quality and accountability, that
> doesn't happen for me in practice,
But you just removed your tags
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 10:54, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> Yes, I want to add it, because with Maven, we recommend some best practices.
Indeed, it was originally made with the bootstrap in mind but for other
purposes it would certainly be good to have the testing occur if
desired.
> If we purpose
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Maven Mboot
> On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 09:46, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> > I think we must add junit test execution with mboot i
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 09:46, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> I think we must add junit test execution with mboot if unit tests exists.
That's easily possible. It wasn't really what I intended for mboot but I
have a new test plugin that's tiny, runs tests in a completely isolated
classloader and only req
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Emmanuel Venisse
Created: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 9:42 AM
Body:
This patch doesn't resolve the problem. It's just a warning message, and plugin works
fine with.
---
vmassol 2004/01/04 07:24:14
Modified:aspectwerkz plugin.jelly
Log:
- Fixed removal of java/lang/Object
- Better naming of variables
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +9 -9 maven-plugins/aspectwerkz/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.jelly
==
evenisse2004/01/04 07:20:25
Modified:jdiffproject.xml
jdiff/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Start new version
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +6 -1 maven-plugins/jdiff/project.xml
Index: project.xml
evenisse2004/01/04 07:16:15
Modified:jdiffproject.xml
jdiff/xdocs changes.xml navigation.xml
Added: jdiff/announcements 1.2.ann
Log:
Prepare for release
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +8 -1 maven-plugins/jdiff/project.xml
Index: projec
evenisse2004/01/04 07:14:48
maven-plugins/jdiff/announcements - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we must add junit test execution with mboot if unit tests exists.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 6:43 AM
Subject: Maven Mboot
> Howdy,
>
> I just finished checking in mboot which
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 07:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Contributor v1.8 has roles and organization. Why is this being removed?
What is contributor v1.8? I see nothing in JIRA about the addition of
those fields in the 'model-additions' (which was pom-additions) or a
request for it.
The same goes
On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 02:37, Michael A Melia wrote:
> To clarify my assumptions:
>
> [usual transitive dependency scenario]
>
> I have project A dependent on project B which is dependent on project C
> and project D.
> I need for project A to pick up the dependencies (C and D) from project B.
Contributor v1.8 has roles and organization. Why is this being removed?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/12/2003 02:10:56 PM:
> jvanzyl 2003/12/28 19:10:56
>
> Modified:simian project.xml
> Log:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 January 2004 00:51
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/pluginJellyPlugin.java
>
> "Stephane Nicoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/01/2004
05:48:18
>
>> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
>> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
>> interpolated already.
> That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
> in the new maven code is to keep the
> Also, I've notiiced that the poms that are installed in the local repo
are
> not interpolated. My solution would rely on the installed poms having
been
> interpolated already.
That wouldn't be a good idea. One of the things I've been striving for
in the new maven code is to keep the model
83 matches
Mail list logo
