jvanzyl 2003/12/08 22:21:34
Modified:.MAVEN-2.x.txt
maven-model-tools project.xml
maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java
Added: maven-model/xdocs index.xml
maven-model
AFAIK, in CVS under committers/logos
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/12/2003 04:52:42 PM:
> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > AFAIR, it's the one from nicola ken.
>
> Y
In the cvs :
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/xdocs/images/
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:57 AM
Subject: Re: maven apache logo
> On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:54, Emman
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:54, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> All Maven logo are here :
> http://projects.walding.com/powered/
Thanks, you know where the banner logos are too?
> Emmanuel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL
All Maven logo are here :
http://projects.walding.com/powered/
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:31 AM
Subject: maven apache logo
> Howdy,
>
> Who made the maven ap
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> AFAIR, it's the one from nicola ken.
You know where to find it?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
>
>
>
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/12/2003 04:31:52 PM:
>
>
AFAIR, it's the one from nicola ken.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/12/2003 04:31:52 PM:
> Howdy,
>
> Who made the maven apache logo? Is that from the incubator generator
> thingy? I would li
Howdy,
Who made the maven apache logo? Is that from the incubator generator
thingy? I would like the one with a white background if anyone knows
where I can find one. I finally agree with Berin that the dark blue
banner is a little harsh.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.z
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 21:19:22
Modified:xdocsnavigation.xml
Log:
o don't need the apachecon logo anymore.
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +1 -4 maven/xdocs/navigation.xml
Index: navigation.xml
===
> > Probably best to say something if it wasn't clear :) Do you mind
> > editing http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/MavenCvs to make it clearer?
>
> I don't read the wiki and really don't consider a development
> aid. I try to look at it but I forget and find it a generally
> repulsive form of proj
Vincent,
I was going to release the FAQ plugin for Martin and was wondering what
you've been doing. Figure I would try to quickly integrate your
procedure into the release plugin and use that. I think Brett's SCM
plugin can deal with the tagging and such so if you don't have something
automated I'
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 17:17:48
Modified:faq/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
o adding changes.xml additions.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +7 -0 maven-plugins/faq/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
===
RC
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 19:52, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Yah, I wasn't aware that was going to occur. I didn't find
> > the explanation clear at all or I would have said something.
>
> Probably best to say something if it wasn't clear :) Do you mind editing
> http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/MavenCvs
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Martin van den Bemt
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 7:19 PM
Fixed in cvs.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPFAQ-6
Here is an ov
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Martin van den Bemt
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 7:19 PM
Fixed in cvs
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPFAQ-2
Here is an ove
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 17:00:51
Modified:faq project.xml
Log:
o cleaning up the reports
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +0 -9 maven-plugins/faq/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Jason van Zyl
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 7:07 PM
o patch applied
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPFAQ-1
Here is an overvi
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 19:41, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> I just added a fix for all the outstanding issues related to the
> maven-faq-plugin (linked the issues together, to see how that works
> out). So if someone could commit that and cut a release, that would be
> cool.
Applied, can you also ma
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 16:57:58
Modified:faq plugin.jelly
faq/xdocs index.xml
Log:
o applying patch for MPFAQ-1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPFAQ-1
[process::MPFAQ-1]
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +6 -4 maven-plugins/
> Yah, I wasn't aware that was going to occur. I didn't find
> the explanation clear at all or I would have said something.
Probably best to say something if it wasn't clear :) Do you mind editing
http://wiki.codehaus.org/maven/MavenCvs to make it clearer?
> You should not have destabalized wha
I just added a fix for all the outstanding issues related to the
maven-faq-plugin (linked the issues together, to see how that works
out). So if someone could commit that and cut a release, that would be
cool.
Also It would be nice to have the batik 1.5 jars uploaded to ibiblio, so
I can release m
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Martin van den Bemt (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 6:19 PM
Comment:
Fixes the issues stated. The element title as a workaround doesn't work anymore using
this patch.
It also contains a patch for the documentation and
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 18:03, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Ok, so where your code go with the plugin manager stuff?
> >
>
> Also on MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH. Everything in CVS should be on that branch, or on
> HEAD.
Yah, I wasn't aware that was going to occur. I didn't find the
explanation clear at all or I w
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Chad Woolley
Created: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 5:20 PM
Body:
OK, after I blew away my .maven dir and had maven redownload all the stuff, it worked.
I would still consider this a bug, if maven isn't smart enough to redownload any
> Ok, so where your code go with the plugin manager stuff?
>
Also on MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH. Everything in CVS should be on that branch, or on
HEAD.
So, the branch is where the current site and 1.0 will be released from. The
leak is fixed, but it has introduced some new bugs (Which are currently in
th
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 17:50, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Ok, now I'm even more confused. Where did the working code go
> > that was in HEAD before the switch-a-roo?
>
> Onto the branch. The 1.0 branch was made very recently and contains
> everything HEAD does except for:
Ok, so where your code go w
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 17:42, Brett Porter wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I think there is still some misunderstanding about what branches there are
> out there - please refer to my previous email. Sorry if I haven't made this
> clear enough in the past.
Yah, I'm definitely confused about what's in the branc
> Ok, now I'm even more confused. Where did the working code go
> that was in HEAD before the switch-a-roo?
Onto the branch. The 1.0 branch was made very recently and contains
everything HEAD does except for:
- POMv4 modifications Vincent made, and the related changes.xml update
- some documenta
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 17:36, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There seems to be some confusion over the current branches.
>
> Inactive:
> MAVEN_RC1_REFACTOR - Jason's initial attempt, no longer builds or
> maintained.
> MAVEN_RC2_UNSTABLE - my work, since moved and branch closed.
>
> Active:
Jason,
I think there is still some misunderstanding about what branches there are
out there - please refer to my previous email. Sorry if I haven't made this
clear enough in the past.
Anyway, I thought we agreed that this particular code would get embedded
into 1.1 (ie HEAD). Go forward with that
Hi all,
There seems to be some confusion over the current branches.
Inactive:
MAVEN_RC1_REFACTOR - Jason's initial attempt, no longer builds or
maintained.
MAVEN_RC2_UNSTABLE - my work, since moved and branch closed.
Active:
MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH - my work, and what should go live for Maven 1.0
HE
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 14:32:50
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java
Log:
o use logger
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +1 -2
maven-components/maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project/DefaultPro
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 14:14:57
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java Project.java
maven-project/src/test/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilderTest.java
I have submitted new issues and/or commented on existing issues (MPEJB-2) in
order to improve the handling of EJB-client jar files. Specifically, I added
support for project.xml dependencies specified with type="ejb-client"
(adding it to the classpath when compiling, etc), and the ability to run an
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 13:31:30
Added: maven-project/src/test/org/apache/maven/project
bad-project.xml
Log:
o test for malformed POM.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
maven-components/maven-project/src/test/org/apache/maven/project/bad-proj
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 13:23:48
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java Project.java
maven-project/src/test/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilderTest.java project.properties
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 13:22:41
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java
Log:
o pass on the interpolated model to the child.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +6 -0
maven-components/maven-project/src/java/o
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: John Casey
Created: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 3:19 PM
Body:
Cross-posted with issues:
MAVEN-1068
MPEJB-2
Where the MPEJB-2 posting is actually an addendum to previous comments by other users
in an existing issue, with a new patch
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: John Casey
Created: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 3:18 PM
Body:
Cross-posted with issues:
MPARTIFACT-4
MPEJB-2
The post to MPEJB-2 is actually an addendum to previous comments by other users, with
a new patch.
---
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: John Casey (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 3:13 PM
Comment:
Patch to support:
ejb:install-client
ejb:install-client-snapshot
ejb:deploy-client
ejb:deploy-client-snapshot
Changes:
Attachment changed to
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: John Casey
Created: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 3:13 PM
Body:
See also:
MAVEN-1068
MPARTIFACT-4
I have created a patch which works with two other patches (see MAVEN-1068 and
MPARTIFACT-4) to:
1. Add ArtifactType support to the De
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: John Casey (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 3:04 PM
Comment:
patch to enable default artifact deployer to use ArtifactType class.
Changes:
Attachment changed to
maven-artifact-deployment-ArtifactType-en
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPARTIFACT-4
Here is an overview of the issue:
---
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Martin van den Bemt
Created: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 3:00 PM
Body:
to get the non ascii characters in the title, you can use the title element instead of
the attribute. It should run like that out of the box. Working on the other
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: John Casey (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 2:51 PM
Comment:
This is the maven-core patch for improving EJB-client handling.
Changes:
Attachment changed to maven-artifact-cleanup-for-ejbclients.patch
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-1068
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 10:27:50
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.java
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +1 -23
maven-components/maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project/Project.java
Index: Project.java
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 10:25:27
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java
Log:
o adapting for legacy isn't the concern of the builder.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +0 -68
maven-components/maven-project/s
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 10:21:47
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java
Log:
o ridding building of more methods not useful to building projects.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +1 -15
maven-components/mav
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 10:20:28
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project
DefaultProjectBuilder.java
Log:
o not the concern of the builder to deal with multiple projects. that can be done
else where in another layer.
Revision ChangesPa
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 10:17:24
Added: maven-project/src/test/org/apache/maven/project
build.properties
Log:
o adding build.properties file for testing.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
maven-components/maven-project/src/test/org/apache/mav
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 10:13:24
Modified:maven-project/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.java
Added: maven-project/src/test/org/apache/maven/project
project.properties
Log:
o cleanup
o add project.properties to get processed.
Revision Chang
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Jason van Zyl
Created: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 12:10 PM
Body:
You realize you must have a source of information for the version to convert the
snapshot to, yes?
What are you trying to convert exactly?
Please do not post some t
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MPRELEASE-2
Here is an overview of the issue:
I'll give it a go later today. (7+ hours from now).
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/12/2003 02:09:03 AM:
> Dion,
>
> I have done a first pass at updating all the general docs in maven-site,
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 3:59 PM:
> Did you exclude checkstyle, as Brett suggested previously?
Yes, but no difference. Results are the same as reported.
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
>>> In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offlin
Brett,
I'm getting pretty close to completion with the maven-project component
so I was going to ask if we could work on one of the branches together
to try and integrate it. I think your plugin work is fairly orthogonal
to what I'm doing with maven-project and I think they could be combined
relat
Dion,
I have done a first pass at updating all the general docs in maven-site,
do you want to multiproject it?
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be jus
Did you exclude checkstyle, as Brett suggested previously?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/12/2003
12:53:01 AM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
> > In the 1.0 b
Because in the 1.0 touchstone is still failing, and it has been turned off
to allow bootstrap to succeed until it's fixed.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Emmanuel Venisse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/12/2003 12:48:14 AM:
> Why? If a
evenisse2003/12/08 06:49:14
Modified:jcoverage project.xml
Log:
Add a missing dependencies for the 1.0 branch
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +5 -0 maven-plugins/jcoverage/project.xml
Index: project.xml
==
Emmanuel Venisse wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 3:25 PM:
> Oups.
> Add in $user.home/build.properties : maven.bootstrap.online=
> With this line, all dependencies will be downloaded.
Yeah. But, as reported, the bootstrap fails then with the touchstone stuff. While this
is expected and seems
Michal,
I'm rapidly approaching complete coverage on maven-project so I'll be
looking for your thoughts on integrating Wagon in a very simple form to
begin with.
I would like simply be able to transform the list of dependencies to
their artifact form which is all I need right now to integrate the
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 06:24:44
maven-components/maven-project/xdocs - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oups.
Add in $user.home/build.properties : maven.bootstrap.online=
With this line, all dependencies will be downloaded.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "Emmanuel Venisse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:04 PM
Subje
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 06:24:19
maven-components/maven-model-tools/xdocs - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jvanzyl 2003/12/08 06:23:50
maven-components/maven-model/xdocs - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emmanuel Venisse wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 3:05 PM:
> try this for obtain an online bootstrap :
> %ANT_HOME%\bin\ant -Dmaven.bootstrap.online= -f build-bootstrap.xml
I already changed temporarily project.properties. The result was summarized below.
Regards,
Jörg
> - Original Message
try this for obtain an online bootstrap :
%ANT_HOME%\bin\ant -Dmaven.bootstrap.online= -f build-bootstrap.xml
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "Jörg Schaible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: Boots
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
> In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
>
> All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
Well, since I did not had any clue, what jars are really needed, I bootstrapped once
being online. While the build
Why? If a user want to test or modify maven with an empty repository, he
must download manually all jars.
I think that it's a bad solution.
In the bootstrap, for build plugins, we use Maven, and maven can
automatically download jars from repo. So why the bootstrap doesn't use this
functionality?
E
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/12/2003
11:33:56 PM:
> Hello,
>
> unfortunate
Hello,
unfortunately I have still troubles building Maven from MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH:
1) Checkout maven with MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH tag
2) Checkout maven-plugins from HEAD (the decision was made not to branch the plugins -
right?)
3) Bootstrapping in maven
Following observations during the boostrapping:
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Martin van den Bemt
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 5:33 AM
This was already done in cvs head...
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=
74 matches
Mail list logo
