[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-936) Specification-Version and Implementation-Vendor-Id not being set

The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: dion gillard Created: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:54 AM Body: I've fixed the jar plugins use of pom.specificationVersion. It now uses pom.currentVersion - View th

cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/jar/xdocs/current changes.xml

dion2003/11/19 22:50:50 Modified:src/plugins-build/jar plugin.jelly src/plugins-build/jar/xdocs/current changes.xml Log: Use pom.currentVersion for Specification-Version Part of MAVEN-936 Revision ChangesPath 1.25 +1 -1 maven/src/plu

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-936) Specification-Version and Implementation-Vendor-Id not being set

The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: John Casey Created: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:59 PM Body: Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see anywhere in the maven core (including core-bundled plugins) where pom.specificationVersion is set. To prove this to myself,

RE: [Status] Creation of new JIRA projects for Maven plugins + ot her stuff

I think I've done it. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/11/2003 02:17:27 PM: > #those who can edit the CVSROOT files. (Root-ish people + PMC chairs) > avail|...,jvanzyl,...,dion,...|CVSROOT > > L

RE: [Status] Creation of new JIRA projects for Maven plugins + ot her stuff

I much prefer 'Lead Developer' to 'Owner'. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/11/2003 02:22:10 PM: > I agree. Is there any precedent? "Owner" as the role do? Or is it Release > Manager, Lead, ...?

cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/jar/xdocs/current changes.xml

dion2003/11/19 19:52:12 Modified:src/plugins-build/jar plugin.jelly src/plugins-build/jar/xdocs/current changes.xml Log: Fix for maven.jar.manifest.extensions.add not being checked correctly. Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +2 -1 m

Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/caller/xdocs changes.xml navigation.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/11/2003 12:01:08 AM: > vmassol 2003/11/16 05:01:08 > > Modified:caller plugin.jelly project.xml >caller/xdocs changes.xml navigation.xml > Log: > - Fixed bug apparently due to some changes in maven core. > ${plugin} seems to now refer

RE: [Status] Creation of new JIRA projects for Maven plugins + ot her stuff

I agree. Is there any precedent? "Owner" as the role do? Or is it Release Manager, Lead, ...? - Brett > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2003 2:18 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: [Status] Creation of new JI

RE: [Status] Creation of new JIRA projects for Maven plugins + ot her stuff

#those who can edit the CVSROOT files. (Root-ish people + PMC chairs) avail|...,jvanzyl,...,dion,...|CVSROOT Looks like you're rootish :) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2003 2:18 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subj

Re: [Proposal] POM compatibility extension

Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/11/2003 03:36:19 AM: [snip] > No comma separated lists. Each element must be a specific version or an > expression like 1.4+ which of course means we must start defining a > standard versioning nomenclature. JDK1.5 has a way of specifying the required

RE: [Status] Creation of new JIRA projects for Maven plugins + ot her stuff

I believe Jason is the only one with commit rights to CVSROOT/avail. Jason, could you please bring the two into synch? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/11/2003 03:21:30 PM: > Although having sai

RE: [Status] Creation of new JIRA projects for Maven plugins + ot her stuff

Why don't we just put the 'owner' as the of a in project.xml? This means we don't need to keep the wiki up to date separate from the project too, and it comes out as part of the site generation. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Brett Po

[jira] Commented: (MPCLOVER-8) XML Report should be generated during site report generation if set to true

The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Sean Timm Created: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 3:39 PM Body: The problem isn't that I need to set maven.clover.report.xml to true...I'm already doing that. The problem is that the code ignores the fact that I've got it set to true

[jira] Updated: (MAVEN-1043) Maven-pdf plugin fails with href link inside an xdoc file

The following issue has been updated: Updater: Xavier RODRIGUEZ (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 5:48 AM Comment: patch for this issue. Changes: Attachment changed to project2fo.xslt.patch

[jira] Created: (MAVEN-1043) Maven-pdf plugin fails with href link inside an xdoc file

Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-1043 Here is an overview of the issue: -

RE: [jira] Commented: (MAVEN-1038) Clover XML Report should be generated during site report generation if set to true

It hasn't been deleted. It has been moved to the maven-clover-plugin JIRA project... Could you please add your comments there? Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Sean Timm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 November 2003 00:38 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: [jira]