Shouldn't we keep using 1.1 as the "next milestone"? We should merge
maven-new-unreleased and 1.1 and rename it appropriately whenever we decide
if it is 1.1 or 2.0 or whatever.
My understanding was 1.1 was the paretial plexus version, and 2.0 was the
full plexus version. I think these sorts of th
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: dion gillard (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 2:08 AM
Changes:
Fix Version changed to maven-new-unreleased
Fix Version changed from 1.0-final
---
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 2:07 AM
Body:
This really isn't an issue for 1.0.
What do we do? Close it? Set up a separate jira project for the plugin?
vmassol 2003/09/28 23:42:41
Modified:xdocsstatus.xml
Log:
points to list of bugs fixed.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +4 -3 maven/xdocs/status.xml
Index: status.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/
Ok, I agree, makes more sense that way.
Reverted.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 04:36:20 PM:
> dIon,
>
> I did this on purpose so that we don't have to change it every time.
> Als
dion2003/09/28 23:40:42
Modified:xdocs/start download.xml
Log:
Back to vincents version
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +1 -1 maven/xdocs/start/download.xml
Index: download.xml
===
RCS file:
> Thanks for the response Brett, I thought at first when nobody
> responded that my request was not well received. :)
Gotta wait for us to get in the right timezone :D
> I was browsing through the bugs and there are some that I can
> definitely help with. Is the procedure just to attach the
AFAIK, yes.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Vincent Massol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 04:24:03 PM:
> Has RC1 been tagged and can we commit again?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>
The Maven team is pleased to announce Release Candidate 1!
http://maven.apache.org/
Maven is a Java project management and project comprehension tool. Maven
is based on the concept of a project object model (POM) in that all the
artifacts produced by Maven are a result of consulting a well define
dIon,
I did this on purpose so that we don't have to change it every time.
Also the text does not say that we are pointing to the latest version
but to the release archive... I think it is best to point to the
archives instead of a specific version.
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From:
Thanks for the response Brett, I thought at first when nobody responded that
my request was not well received. :)
I was browsing through the bugs and there are some that I can definitely
help with. Is the procedure just to attach the patch to the bug defect?
I'm on the mailing list now so I'll
dion2003/09/28 23:33:48
Modified:xdocs/start download.xml
Log:
Fix URL again
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +2 -2 maven/xdocs/start/download.xml
Index: download.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/m
dion2003/09/28 23:29:09
Modified:.project.xml
Log:
Move name to SNAPSHOT
Revision ChangesPath
1.310 +1 -1 maven/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/maven/proje
dion2003/09/28 23:28:38
Modified:.project.xml
Log:
Fix typo
Revision ChangesPath
1.309 +1 -1 maven/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/maven/project.xml,v
re
dion2003/09/28 23:27:59
Modified:src/plugins-build/runner project.xml
src/plugins-build/scm/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-build/word2html/xdocs/current changes.xml
src/plugins-build/uberjar/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-buil
Has RC1 been tagged and can we commit again?
Thanks
-Vincent
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
vmassol 2003/09/28 23:22:37
Modified:xdocs/start download.xml
Log:
Fixed URL. Can someone upload the web site again?
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +1 -1 maven/xdocs/start/download.xml
Index: download.xml
===
I would anticipate that Maven should permit inheritance of the three files
below (project.xml, project.properties, maven.xml), and in this case there
is true inheritance...all properties defined by the child override the
parent definition.
But I would suggest it is the aggregete of the propertie
dion2003/09/28 23:18:41
Modified:src/plugins-build/latka/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-build/jalopy/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-build/linkcheck/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-build/latex/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-build/
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 02:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Missed something here...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/09/2003 03:12:08 PM:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > b11
> > - 1.0-beta-11
> > + 1.0-rc1
> > HEAD
> >
> >
>
> The is still b11.
Yup, my mi
dion2003/09/28 23:12:03
Modified:src/plugins-build/hibernate project.xml
Log:
Fix typo
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +1 -1 maven/src/plugins-build/hibernate/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
Missed something here...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/09/2003 03:12:08 PM:
[snip]
>
> b11
> - 1.0-beta-11
> + 1.0-rc1
> HEAD
>
>
The is still b11.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
-
dion2003/09/28 23:09:54
Modified:src/plugins-build/dist/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-build/checkstyle/xdocs/current changes.xml
src/plugins-build/clover/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-build/ant/xdocs changes.xml
src/plugins-
jvanzyl 2003/09/28 22:45:00
Modified:src/announcements 1.0-rc1.ann
Log:
o correctly download directory. use the currentVersion from the POM.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 maven/src/announcements/1.0-rc1.ann
Index: 1.0-rc1.ann
===
jvanzyl 2003/09/28 22:42:12
Modified:xdocsstatus.xml
Log:
o updating status document.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +10 -3 maven/xdocs/status.xml
Index: status.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ma
jvanzyl 2003/09/28 22:12:31
Modified:.maven.xml
Log:
o adding goal to help with pre-release work.
Revision ChangesPath
1.93 +11 -0 maven/maven.xml
Index: maven.xml
===
RCS file: /hom
jvanzyl 2003/09/28 22:12:08
Modified:.project.xml
Log:
o moving to rc1
Revision ChangesPath
1.308 +2 -2 maven/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/maven/project.xml
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 September 2003 05:40
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: RC1 announcement contents
>
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/09/2003 11:39:22 AM:
>
>
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 00:44, Brett Porter wrote:
> Jason - perhaps the AspectJ plugin from b-10 should be released on ibiblio
> so it can be downloaded that way to? And put this in the FAQ in advance :)
That definitely can't hurt. I can certainly put the plugin jar up on
ibiblio. Do you want to do
Hi,
I'm doing the conversion of snapshots to released versions now, I'll
commit that and then try some test bundles so hopefully not too long
now.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical ord
Jason - perhaps the AspectJ plugin from b-10 should be released on ibiblio
so it can be downloaded that way to? And put this in the FAQ in advance :)
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 2:41 PM
> To: Maven U
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 18:52, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I've implemented all of the code needed from the branch to solve the
> main part of the leak, which is the multiple creation of plugin and ant
> projects. All unit tests pass, but I can't currently bootstrap because of
> some bugs
jvanzyl 2003/09/28 21:12:21
Removed: src/plugins-build/aspectj .cvsignore plugin.jelly
plugin.properties project.properties project.xml
src/plugins-build/aspectj/announcements 1.1.ann
src/plugins-build/aspectj/xdocs .cvsignore changes
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 00:01, Nathan Coast wrote:
> > maven.xml already gets run as well. My latest work not only clears up
> > inheritence for project.xml but also loads parent project.properties I
> > think. I haven't tested that far yet as I am clearing up other issues with
> > it. This needs mor
Not sure, but I was looking at the code yesterday afternoon that said it
did... Not that it guarantees anything :)
Pretty sure it does in beta-10 - I've been bitten by it before because I
didn't expect it.
I will clarify in the doco as I continue to work through this stuff.
> -Original Messag
maven.xml already gets run as well. My latest work not only clears up
inheritence for project.xml but also loads parent project.properties I
think. I haven't tested that far yet as I am clearing up other issues with
it. This needs more discussion as dIon and I disagree on what exactly should
be inh
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 22:17, bob mcwhirter wrote:
> > I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA for
> > fixes between now and the last release?
>
> Yah, if you've used the Roadmap feature appropriately, and marked
> bugs with the correct fixed-in-version, then yes, it's super
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/09/2003 11:39:22 AM:
> Do you mean that you're in no rush to do the release?
Right, if you think the fix list is important then put that in and then
I'll cut the release.
> I thought you'd asked for no commits
maven.xml already gets run as well. My latest work not only clears up
inheritence for project.xml but also loads parent project.properties I
think. I haven't tested that far yet as I am clearing up other issues with
it. This needs more discussion as dIon and I disagree on what exactly should
be inh
Hi,
I'd just like to clarify what the current state of play is with project
inheritence and where the eventual goal is.
I think there are 3 artifacts which could sensibly be inherited.
project.xml / POM
project.properties
maven.xml
I remember reading in a post from Jason that eventually all thr
> I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA for
> fixes between now and the last release?
Yah, if you've used the Roadmap feature appropriately, and marked
bugs with the correct fixed-in-version, then yes, it's super-easy.
Dunno if we have.
-bob
--
dion2003/09/28 19:09:18
Modified:src/announcements 1.0-rc1.ann
Log:
Use the URLs
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +7 -184maven/src/announcements/1.0-rc1.ann
Index: 1.0-rc1.ann
===
RCS file: /ho
Last 500 lines of a clean bootstrap build of maven at 20030928-2200
[exec] testPlugin:
[exec] clean:clean:
[exec] [delete] Deleting directory
/usr/local/builds/maven/src/maven/src/plugins-build/checkstyle/src/plugin-test/target
[exec
dion2003/09/28 19:01:23
Added: src/announcements 1.0-rc1.ann
Log:
Start on announce.
Editing content
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 maven/src/announcements/1.0-rc1.ann
Index: 1.0-rc1.ann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/09/2003 11:39:22 AM:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 11:20:12 AM:
>
> > On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Can we please include a list of fixed bugs and outstanding ones in
the
> rc1
> > > announcement?
> >
> > +1
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 11:20:12 AM:
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can we please include a list of fixed bugs and outstanding ones in the
rc1
> > announcement?
>
> +1
>
> I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can we please include a list of fixed bugs and outstanding ones in the rc1
> announcement?
+1
I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA for
fixes between now and the last release?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consul
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 10:29:53 AM:
>
> > On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 19:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > > I am certain it won't get long to have Maven2-Aplha1 out.
> > >
> > > Maven2-Alpha1 could have been o
Can we please include a list of fixed bugs and outstanding ones in the rc1
announcement?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 8:26 PM
Body:
This is because the plugin cache manager parses files before they are loaded and
doesn't parse the 'd files.
I doubt this will change for 1.0.
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 10:29:53 AM:
> On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 19:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > I am certain it won't get long to have Maven2-Aplha1 out.
> >
> > Maven2-Alpha1 could have been out six months ago if the people working
on
> > it wanted to.
>
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 08:52:00 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I think I've implemented all of the code needed from the branch to solve
the
> main part of the leak, which is the multiple creation of plugin and ant
> projects. All unit tests pass, but I can't currently bootstrap beca
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 19:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am certain it won't get long to have Maven2-Aplha1 out.
>
> Maven2-Alpha1 could have been out six months ago if the people working on
> it wanted to.
Sometimes things don't work out quite as planned.
http://blogs.codehaus.org/proj
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 19:31, Brett Porter wrote:
> I don't think so. Its not the java plugin's responsibility to know about
> every other technology needing to post-process its results. It should be an
> rmi plugin (small as it is).
Vincent's caller plugin will probably be able to help with this.
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 19:11, Brett Porter wrote:
> I noticed that afterwards on the user list. Cool.
>
> I wonder if the wiki is a better place to formulate these sorts of things
> though? The blog is really more a of "news and status" type thing.
There will definitely be pointers to the wiki for
I don't think so. Its not the java plugin's responsibility to know about
every other technology needing to post-process its results. It should be an
rmi plugin (small as it is).
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003
In a couple of projects I work on, I add a postGoal
to java:compile to invoke rmic - from other posts, this seems
to be a fairly common approach.
Would it be worth adding support for this to the java plugin? E.g (OTOH):
-Tim
I noticed that afterwards on the user list. Cool.
I wonder if the wiki is a better place to formulate these sorts of things
though? The blog is really more a of "news and status" type thing.
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monda
"Michal Maczka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 01:52:21 AM:
> Vincent!
>
> I think this idea is cool.
>
> I am just afraid that realization won't be so smooth, as this requires
> better coordination between plugins.
>
> I am not saying "no" to you initiative - but I'd like to rather se
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 18:16, Brett Porter wrote:
> There's a lot to do here, but the current roadmap is probably in Jason's
> head :)
I'm revvy up the blog, the good chunk of it will come pouring out this
week.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man
Hi,
I think I've implemented all of the code needed from the branch to solve the
main part of the leak, which is the multiple creation of plugin and ant
projects. All unit tests pass, but I can't currently bootstrap because of
some bugs in the execution. I'll work through them soon. I should be r
> 1) I understand that 1.0 is near being complete. Is that
> true? (To that extent I don't know if I want to get involved
> in the last stages of this project because it will take too
> much ramp up time for me to be an effective
> developer.)
There's a bunch of bugs in JIRA for 1.0. We'd rea
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: fabrizio giustina (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 4:21 PM
Comment:
this attachment replaces the previous patch and contains the fixed plugin.jelly plus a
test goal (updates plugin-test/maven.xml, plugin-test/xdoc/navi
Howdy,
The aspectj plugin has now been moved to the maven-plugins module:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven-plugins/
Vincent, feel free to hack away! The only thing I would suggest is
possibly trying to make the plugins self-contained and removing the
element so each plugin really can liv
Vincent!
I think this idea is cool.
I am just afraid that realization won't be so smooth, as this requires
better coordination between plugins.
I am not saying "no" to you initiative - but I'd like to rather see Maven
1.0 out ASAP
and then concentrate our efforts on service oriented version of
Howdy,
Should be able to commit again tonight. Just getting back into the swing
of things so it's taking me longer than expected but rc1 will land
shortly.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and tech
66 matches
Mail list logo
