Sounds great.
How can I help???
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Ralph Apel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16/09/2003 03:46:08 PM:
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:31:06 +0300
> From: Diomidis Spinellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Athens U
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:31:06 +0300
From: Diomidis Spinellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Athens University of Ecomomics and Business
To: Ralph Apel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: UmlGraph as a Maven Plugin ?
Ralph Apel wrote:
> recently I suggested to use your UmlGraph Doclet within the
dion2003/09/15 21:54:20
Modified:src/plugins-build/xdoc plugin.jelly
Log:
Reformatting
use empty, not == null
Revision ChangesPath
1.50 +11 -17maven/src/plugins-build/xdoc/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.jelly
=
Can't you use doc:jsl?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Fabrizio Giustina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16/09/2003 07:00:57
AM:
>
> I've just written a new plugin which performs a validation of the
> produced documentation, checking the x
Done.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/09/2003
05:39:57 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >Are we all in agreement that the next release should happen pretty
soon,
> >and be c
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: dion gillard
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:33 PM
Applied patch today, thanks.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-690
H
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: dion gillard (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:33 PM
Changes:
Fix Version changed to 1.0-rc1
Fix Version changed from 1.1
-
dion2003/09/15 21:16:43
Modified:src/plugins-build/torque plugin.jelly project.xml
src/plugins-build/torque/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Apply MAVEN-690
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +3 -3 maven/src/plugins-build/torque/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.j
Last 500 lines of a clean bootstrap build of maven at 20030915-2200
[exec] java:jar-resources:
[exec] Copying 1 file to
/usr/local/builds/maven/src/maven/src/plugins-build/webserver/target/classes/plugin-resources
[exec] Copying 4 files to
/usr/local/builds/maven/src/maven/src
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 19:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/09/2003
> 05:39:57 PM:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > >Are we all in agreement that the next release should happen pretty
> soon,
> > >and be called 1.0-beta-11?
> >
>
Works for me.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/09/2003 10:24:23 PM:
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 04:21, Michal Maczka wrote:
>
> > -1 on calling it beta-11
> > +1 on calling it RC1
> >
> >
>
> All
"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/09/2003
05:39:57 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >Are we all in agreement that the next release should happen pretty
soon,
> >and be called 1.0-beta-11?
>
> >I'm +0 on that name vs 1.0-RC1, as we know we aren't adding new
> >fun
I've just written a new plugin which performs a validation of the
produced documentation, checking the xhtml code for errors and producing
a complete report.
Since the plugin need to run after the html generation has been
completed, it is registered in a way similar to the linkcheck plugin.
The r
vmassol 2003/09/15 13:08:11
Modified:src/plugins-build/cactus/xdocs index.xml
Log:
fixed typo
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -1 maven/src/plugins-build/cactus/xdocs/index.xml
Index: index.xml
=
vmassol 2003/09/15 13:04:07
Modified:src/plugins-build/cactus project.xml
src/plugins-build/cactus/xdocs changes.xml navigation.xml
index.xml
Added: src/plugins-build/cactus/announcements 3.1.ann
Log:
Preparing for 3.1 release. Please do
+1 from me.
Sorry, lost the original call-for-vote.
-bob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-821
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-820
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
Done.
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15/09/03
Objet: Re: Non g+w dirs on maven.apache.org
I thought that was on ibiblio, not maven.apache.org?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 September 2003 14:24
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Next release?
>
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 04:21, Michal Maczka wrote:
>
> > -1 on calling it beta-11
> > +1 on calling it RC1
> >
> >
>
> All ri
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 04:21, Michal Maczka wrote:
> -1 on calling it beta-11
> +1 on calling it RC1
>
>
All right looks like rc1 it is then.
How about the same tact we took last time in allowing people the week to
spend some time with plugins they are interested in? If so then I will
roll out
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Next release?
>
> Are we all in agreement that the next release should happen pretty
soon,
> and be called 1.0-beta-11?
>
> I'm +0 on th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Are we all in agreement that the next release should happen pretty soon,
>and be called 1.0-beta-11?
>I'm +0 on that name vs 1.0-RC1, as we know we aren't adding new
>functionality.
>Any objections/vote now?
>Here's my +1.
Please, please, please, please, please, pl
+1 on the release. People are clamouring for a 1.0, so at least getting
1.0-rc1 out would be good. And the open bug list actually looks pretty
short according to the roadmap.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:3
24 matches
Mail list logo
