I just noticed the other day that,
1) Unknown users can raise issues for Maven
2) Unknown users can comment on issues for Maven
While this makes it really simple for unknown people to raise issues
against Maven, it makes it impossible for us to track who raised an
issue if they aren't logged in
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-715
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
Is the solution then to change the plugin to respect modifications made by
users? Maybe have an eclipse target that respects those modifications, and
an eclipse:clean that rebuilds it from scratch?
ERic Pugh
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark H. Wilkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
bwalding2003/08/22 15:56:57
Modified:src/plugins-build/jxr plugin.jelly
Log:
Now copies stylesheet into jxr test output
PR: MAVEN-713
Submitted by: Unknown
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +19 -2 maven/src/plugins-build/jxr/plugin.jelly
Index: plugin.jelly
==
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 11:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following comment has been added to this issue:
>
> Author: Emmanuel Venisse
> Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 5:56 AM
>Body:
> I'm -1 for this modification.
>
> a) it exists more than one checkstyle plugin for eclipse
> - ht
Hi there,
how exactly should I contribute a Patch?
In have an initial version of a new
maven-dotuml-plugin
which generates UML Class Diagrams in .dot format, based on javadoc with
a custom Doclet.
Would it be ok to send
1) cvs diff -u > dotuml.path
2) one jar with sources and configfiles ?
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-714
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-713
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Vincent Massol
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 8:12 AM
Body:
Yep. Entering an issue in JIRA is a good way to make sure it will happen! This item is
also on my todo list but I'm currently very busy finishing a book (JUnit in Act
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author:
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 8:56 AM
Body:
Not if you got it via ftp!
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-709
He
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Mark Wilkinson
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 8:23 AM
Body:
A less silly patch might see whether lib.dependency.type == 'jar'
-
View the issue:
http://jira
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Ryan Sonnek
Created: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 4:13 PM
Body:
Hi again Vincint,
I was going back through the mailing list, and came across my last question on the
cactus plugin (which you helped me out on). you said:
What I'm say
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Vincent Massol
Created: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 4:02 PM
Body:
I completely concur! Do you have a patch? :-)
Thanks
-Vincent
-
View the issue:
http://jira.cod
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Martin Skopp
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:32 AM
Body:
I will send a doc patch ASAP
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-710
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Emmanuel Venisse
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:00 AM
Fixed by Michal
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-593
Here is an
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Emmanuel Venisse
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:18 AM
I don't apply the patch, but I suppress protocol declaration that is unnecessary.
-
View the issue:
http://
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Emmanuel Venisse
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:01 AM
Fixed by michal
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-594
Here is an
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-709
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Emmanuel Venisse
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 5:41 AM
the meta tag is already in generated html head.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-711
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Piotr Maj
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 6:47 AM
Body:
Attached file applies to todays CVS HEAD, not for beta-10. Sorry for confusion.
-
View the issue:
htt
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Emmanuel Venisse
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 5:56 AM
Body:
I'm -1 for this modification.
a) it exists more than one checkstyle plugin for eclipse
- http://www.mvmsoft.de/content/plugins/checkclipse/checkclipse.htm
- http:
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-712
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Piotr Maj (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 6:43 AM
Changes:
Attachment changed to classpath.jelly.patch
-
For a full history of the is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 7:51 PM
Body:
do we need better documentation for this feature?
Yes.
It is not mentioned at
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/javadoc/properties.html
evenisse2003/08/22 02:47:52
Modified:src/plugins-build/checkstyle/xdocs properties.xml
Log:
Fix typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 maven/src/plugins-build/checkstyle/xdocs/properties.xml
Index: properties.xml
===
Fixed. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Matic Langford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: checkstyle plugin documentation
> hi,
>
> I've noticed a little bugette in the checkstyle documentation:
>
> the property "maven
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: Brett Porter
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:45 AM
patched repository-upload.xml
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-710
H
brett 2003/08/22 02:32:36
Modified:xdocsrepository-upload.xml
Log:
PR: MAVEN-710
Change repository upload procedure from mailing maven-dev to uploading to JIRA.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2 maven/xdocs/repository-upload.xml
Index: repository-uplo
hi,
I've noticed a little bugette in the checkstyle documentation:
the property "maven.checkstyle.usefile" has been documented as
"maven.checkstyle.useFile" (note the capital F)
do you want me to raise this in JIRA?
simon
The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Emmanuel Venisse
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 4:39 AM
Body:
Which version of plugin.jelly do you use? I fixed this on Aug 5.
I think we can close this issue.
---
dion2003/08/22 01:43:58
Modified:src/plugins-build/javadoc plugin.jelly
src/plugins-build/javadoc/xdocs properties.xml
Log:
Again with MAVEN-694.
The patch didn't apply successfully and I've done it manually again.
Please check
Revision Changes
evenisse2003/08/22 02:08:09
Modified:src/plugins-build/jbuilder plugin.jelly
src/plugins-build/jbuilder/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
Fix MAVEN-668. I don't apply the patch present in Jira, but I suppress protocol
declaration that it's unnecessary.
Revision Changes
+0 (already enough +1's to get this done 3 times over :)
- Brett
dion2003/08/22 01:01:24
Modified:src/java/org/apache/maven/plugin PluginCacheManager.java
Log:
- Fix license
- Fix file in use issues when storing/loading properties files
- Various checkstyle issues
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +53 -67maven/src/java/org/apa
+1 for me
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Skopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: VOTE: Change policy for posting upload requests ?
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 01:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So send
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Martin Skopp
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 3:51 AM
Body:
+1 (and I mean it)
maven -especially the plugins- need better documentation.
There are _lots_ of undocumented properties, this is just one example.
maven.javadoc.links i
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Martin Skopp (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 3:35 AM
Comment:
Uploaded full_files.zip for anybody who likes to test the new features (or needs full
files for cvs commit)
Installation instructions:
a) Unzip file.
b)
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: Martin Skopp (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 3:30 AM
Comment:
First of all: The "Attach File" option was no longer available after my first file
upload!!! I had to cheat JIRA a little to manage this second upload...
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Michael Brown
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 2:56 AM
Body:
Er... I attached it!
-
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-7
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Martin Skopp
Created: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 2:09 AM
Body:
Thanks dion + simon so far.
First I thought that using maven.mode.online would be sufficient, but Simon is right,
I better add "maven.javadoc.mode.online" property for
Last 500 lines of a clean bootstrap build of maven at 20030821-2200
[exec] java:jar-resources:
[exec] Copying 1 file to
/usr/local/builds/maven/src/maven/src/plugins-build/webserver/target/classes/plugin-resources
[exec] Copying 4 files to
/usr/local/builds/maven/src/maven/src/plu
+1 from me
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Martin Skopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/08/2003 07:13:33 PM:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 01:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So send me a patch to update the docs and have a vote up here.
>
> Ok
44 matches
Mail list logo
