[jira] Created: (MAVEN-507) upload jdom b-9 to repo

2003-06-19 Thread jira
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-507 Here is an overview of the issue: --

[jira] Created: (MAVEN-506) upload castor xml 0.9.5 to repo

2003-06-19 Thread jira
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-506 Here is an overview of the issue: --

Re: cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployerDefaultArtifactDeployer.java MavenDeployRequest.java

2003-06-19 Thread dion
Shouldn't the "maven.deploy." at least be a constant somewhere? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Work: http://www.multitask.com.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19/06/2003 08:52:26 PM: > michal 2003/06/19 03:52:25 > > Modified:

Re: RFC: Deployer properties

2003-06-19 Thread dion
"Michal Maczka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/06/2003 10:48:48 PM: > Please comment this: > > > With new deployer API I am going to support deployment to many remote > repositories. > In reality many = 2 in most of the cases. But 2>1 .. > > I am proposing to use following properties: > > #th

Re: JBoss plugin - new modifications

2003-06-19 Thread James CE Johnson
BTW: Are you going to make jboss plugin compatible with jboss 3.2x series? What is not compatible? I seem to remember I have used it with JBoss 3.2.1. maven.jboss.jmx.url.deploy=http://${maven.jboss.hostname}:${maven.jboss. po rt }/jmx- console/HtmlAdaptor?action=invo

cvs commit: maven/src/java/org/apache/maven DefaultProjectUnmarshaller.java

2003-06-19 Thread jvanzyl
jvanzyl 2003/06/19 16:26:22 Added: src/java/org/apache/maven DefaultProjectUnmarshaller.java Log: o New POM unmarshaller. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultProjectUnmarshaller.java Index: DefaultProjectUnmarshaller.jav

cvs commit: maven/src/java/org/apache/maven DefaultProjectMarshaller.java

2003-06-19 Thread jvanzyl
jvanzyl 2003/06/19 16:26:08 Added: src/java/org/apache/maven DefaultProjectMarshaller.java Log: o New POM marshaller. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultProjectMarshaller.java Index: DefaultProjectMarshaller.java

cvs commit: maven project.xml

2003-06-19 Thread jvanzyl
jvanzyl 2003/06/19 16:25:42 Modified:.project.xml Log: o Updating the deps for the new marshaller/unmarshaller for the POM. Hopefully I can hand some stuff over to Ben :-) Revision ChangesPath 1.279 +37 -7 maven/project.xml Index: project.xml ==

Re: RFC: Deployer properties

2003-06-19 Thread Brett Porter
Looks good. A few questions: maven.repo.repo1.remote.group= goo Is remote.group really needed? How is this different to pom.groupId? maven.deploy.repo.ibiblio = http://www.ibiblio.org maven.deploy.repo.ibiblio.directory = /maven Is the extra deploy here a typo? If it is something different, what

cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/deploy DeployRequest.java DeployTool.java

2003-06-19 Thread michal
michal 2003/06/19 15:02:37 Modified:src/plugins-build/artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/deploy/deployers FtpDeployer.java FileDeployer.java src/plugins-build/artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer DefaultArtif

Re: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Juergen Heidak
Wow you're very fast I just sent the mail an already got an answer :-)) I know that the source directories are configurable at the moment I just wanted to make sure that this will also be the case in the future (after eventually changes to the directory layout) because changing the layout of a

Re: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Juergen Heidak wrote: > > I like the idea of adding more structural information to the directory > layout but all changes should be backward compatible because many > projects already use maven and can not adapt a possible new structure > without great effort. > > In oth

Re: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Juergen Heidak
I like the idea of adding more structural information to the directory layout but all changes should be backward compatible because many projects already use maven and can not adapt a possible new structure without great effort. In other words: The path to the different source directories (jav

cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/cactus/xdocs changes.xml

2003-06-19 Thread vmassol
@@ cactus cactus - 13-1.5dev-20030607 + 13-1.5dev-20030619 cactus cactus-ant - 13-1.5dev-20030607 + 13-1.5dev-20030619 commons-httpclient 1.10 +7 -1 maven/src/plugins

cvs commit: maven/xdocs sun-licensing-journey.xml

2003-06-19 Thread jvanzyl
jvanzyl 2003/06/19 07:53:26 Modified:xdocssun-licensing-journey.xml Log: o Sent a message off to Tom Kincaid for approval for the packages we collected in this document. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +4 -0 maven/xdocs/sun-licensing-journey.xml Index: su

Re: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Ben Walding
That's my preference also. And it also makes it look like you can have multiple build trees, yet not! Muahahaha... I demand more emails on the user list dammit! Michal Maczka wrote: I also think it is bit inconsistent. But think that the most consistent approach is / basedir main

cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/jboss/xdocs changes.xml goals.xml

2003-06-19 Thread vmassol
vmassol 2003/06/19 07:06:20 Modified:src/plugins-build/jboss plugin.jelly src/plugins-build/jboss/xdocs changes.xml goals.xml Log: When generating the JBoss server configuration zip, exclude JBoss tmp and log directories from the zip.

cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/war plugin.jelly

2003-06-19 Thread vmassol
vmassol 2003/06/19 07:01:51 Modified:src/plugins-build/war plugin.jelly Log: fix comment Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +11 -17maven/src/plugins-build/war/plugin.jelly Index: plugin.jelly === RCS

[jira] Updated: (MAVEN-481) Enhancement for war plugin to deploy tlds from repository

2003-06-19 Thread jira
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Gareth Hunt (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 9:08 AM Comment: Have updated patch to reflect recent changes to the code. Please ignore older patch file. Changes: Attachment changed from to plugin.jelly.pat

RE: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Michal Maczka
I also think it is bit inconsistent. But think that the most consistent approach is / basedir main java resources aspects conf test java test-resources ... Michal P.S. I am not saying we should change anything ... > ---

RE: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 09:23, Vincent Massol wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 19 June 2003 15:02 > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: Re: Why is the java source directory named "main" for > plugins? > > > > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at

RE: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 June 2003 15:02 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins? > > On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 06:32, Vincent Massol wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Why is the java sou

Re: Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 06:32, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi, > > Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins (instead of > "java")? /src/test /src/main Seem to make more sense as a pattern as the testing code is also 'java' code. > Thanks > -Vincent > > > ---

Re: new Artifact plugin and WAR plugin war:install goal

2003-06-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 06:32, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi Michal, > > I've had a look at the source code for the new artifact plugin... and it > is really proof-of-concept code at this stage and I'm totally sure there > are lots of bugs (it is really far from production quality right now). I > don't

RFC: Deployer properties

2003-06-19 Thread Michal Maczka
Please comment this: With new deployer API I am going to support deployment to many remote repositories. In reality many = 2 in most of the cases. But 2>1 .. I am proposing to use following properties: #the list of repositories. repo1, repo2 are aliases or nicknames of repositories maven.deploy

RE: new Artifact plugin and WAR plugin war:install goal

2003-06-19 Thread Vincent Massol
Thanks Michal. The war:install goal seems to be working for me now, so I'll leave it as it is. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 June 2003 13:00 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: new Artifact plugin and WAR plugin war:

RFC: Deployer properties

2003-06-19 Thread Michal Maczka
With new deployer API I am going to support deployment to many remote repsoitories. In reality many = 2 in most of the cases. But 2>1 .. I am proposiing to use follwoing properties: #the list of repositories. repo1, repo2 are aliases or nicknames of repositories maven.repo.deploy = repo1, repo2

RE: new Artifact plugin and WAR plugin war:install goal

2003-06-19 Thread Michal Maczka
I quickly committed latest version which has install goal fixed. Install snapshot should also work. So I guess functionality is matching the old code. But no problem fell free to use old install goal if you still have a problems. Michal P.S Note that war plugin haven't got deploy and deploy-sna

cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer DefaultArtifactDeployer.java MavenDeployRequest.java

2003-06-19 Thread michal
michal 2003/06/19 03:52:25 Modified:src/plugins-build/artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer DefaultArtifactDeployer.java MavenDeployRequest.java Log: Install goal fixed Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +22 -12

Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins?

2003-06-19 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi, Why is the java source directory named "main" for plugins (instead of "java")? Thanks -Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

new Artifact plugin and WAR plugin war:install goal

2003-06-19 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Michal, I've had a look at the source code for the new artifact plugin... and it is really proof-of-concept code at this stage and I'm totally sure there are lots of bugs (it is really far from production quality right now). I don't mind that but I do mind using it in our WAR plugin at this poi

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2003 22:01 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin [snip] > > I think we're talking about the same thing. You can have a jelly taglib > > that wraps the Ant task. > > >