As the subject says: the asfext:pmc value is incorrect; it must point
to a PMC not a release.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Projects
Date: 10 April 2018 at 03:00
Subject: WARN: invalid asfext:pmc
'https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/' in
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/doap
Please fix this.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Projects
Date: 12 April 2018 at 03:00
Subject: WARN: invalid asfext:pmc
'https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/' in
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/doap_log4j.rdf
To: Site Development
WARN: invalid asfext:pmc 'https://logging.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 18:55, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> The Apache Log4j Audit team is pleased to announce the Log4j Audit 1.0.1
> release!
>
> Apache Log4j Audit is a framework for performing audit logging using a
> predefined catalog of audit events. It provides a tool to create and edit
> audit
FYI
-- Forwarded message -
From: Projects
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 02:00
Subject: Cannot find doap file:
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/doap_log4j.rdf
To: Site Development
URL: https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/doap_log4j.rdf
HTTP Error 404: Not Found
Source:
https://
The links for the previous release (2.3) actually point to 2.12.1
They should ideally use sha256 or sha512 and not md5
Sebb
Also the section for 2.12.1 should now be removed; presumably no-one
should be using it going forward?
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 12:30, sebb wrote:
>
> The links for the previous release (2.3) actually point to 2.12.1
>
> They should ideally use sha256 or sha512 and not md5
>
> Sebb
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 14:17, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> It seems to me we should drop:
> - 2.12.1
BTW, this is referenced from:
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/log4j-2.12.2/download.html
which redirects to
https://logging.apache.org/log4j/log4j-2.12.1/download.html
That page anyway needs an urge
2 site and change
> 2.12.1 back to its original state.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> > On Dec 15, 2021, at 6:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > Also the section for 2.12.1 should now be removed; presumably no-one
> > should be using it going forward?
> >
> > On Wed, 1
OK, in the meantime please update projects.xml to remove the link
On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 16:09, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> There’s a bug in the doap plugin on certain architectures. We’ll have to look
> into this to re-enable the plugin.
>
> —
> Matt Sicker
>
> > On D
The logging project currently has 3 KEYS files under
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging
KEYS
log4net/KEYS
log4php/KEYS
Ideally these should be combined at the top level and redirects added.
Sebb
stead.
KEYS files are still needed for dormant (and archived) components.
Entries in KEYS files should not be dropped once they have been used
to sign a release.
Sebb.
[I suppose if a key is revoked, it might make sense to drop the entry,
but I would check this with Infra first]
> --
> Ma
On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 17:03, Carter Kozak wrote:
>
> You can find the PMC list here:
> https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=logging
AFAIK that uses the LDAP group.
The official list is derived from committee-info.txt as shown by Whimsy:
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/loggin
On Fri, 24 Dec 2021 at 17:57, Vladimir Sitnikov
wrote:
>
> 1) I stand corrected, I misinterpreted the phonebook (I watched on bold
> records only), so your calculation was correct. Sorry for that.
Entries in bold are ASF members.
> > which was only started 19 hours ago
>
> "vote count != consens
https://github.com/apache/logging-flume/blob/trunk/doap_Flume.rdf
still shows the PMC as Flume; please update to show PMC Logging.
Thanks,
Sebb
Ping?
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 11:42, sebb wrote:
>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-flume/blob/trunk/doap_Flume.rdf
> still shows the PMC as Flume; please update to show PMC Logging.
>
> Thanks,
> Sebb
Note: this is the line that needs to be fixed:
https://github.com/apache/logging-flume/blob/trunk/doap_Flume.rdf#L29
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 08:57, sebb wrote:
>
> Ping?
>
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 11:42, sebb wrote:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/logging-flume/b
PING - still needs to be fixed.
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 00:42, sebb wrote:
>
> Note: this is the line that needs to be fixed:
>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-flume/blob/trunk/doap_Flume.rdf#L29
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 08:57, sebb wrote:
> >
> > Ping?
>
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 at 20:40, Jan Friedrich wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
>
> is this what you want?
>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-flume/pull/421
That is what needs to be done so that projects.a.o works properly for Flume.
[It is not something that I personally want]
18 matches
Mail list logo
