it's not "mono vs multi (Git) repo setup" but "monolithic vs component-oriented
release"
longer explanation:
IMHO, you should frame the discussion about:
1. keeping unique global/monolithic release of all log4j
vs
2. splitting log4j into multiple parts/components released separately (with
depend
components sites (each with their separate release documentation history)
On 2023/09/01 07:09:46 Herve Boutemy wrote:
> it's not "mono vs multi (Git) repo setup" but "monolithic vs
> component-oriented release"
>
> longer explanation:
> IMHO, you should
