Re: Logger names for nested classes

2017-08-13 Thread Apache
You cannot replace. We always must support dots. But some people have asked for '/' as well. Sent from my iPad > On Aug 13, 2017, at 8:38 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > Yes > >> On 13 Aug 2017 5:13 p.m., "Gary Gregory" wrote: >> >> You are talking about replacing $ with dot in the getLogger

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Log4j 2.x #3005

2017-08-20 Thread Apache
I guess it was changed from getPid() to pid() after 156. I will have to see if Jenkins has a newer release. Sent from my iPad > On Aug 20, 2017, at 7:51 PM, Apache Jenkins Server > wrote: > > See > <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202.x/3005/display/redirect?page=cha

Log4J 2.9.1 release

2017-09-11 Thread Apache
I am thinking about doing the Log4J 2.9.1 release at the end of the week as there are a couple of bugs I'd like published by the time Java 9 is released. Ralph

Re: Log4j support for Tomcat, TomEE, JBoss, etc.

2017-09-11 Thread Apache
I created a Log4J-appserver module and added the Tomcat support there. I took a look at jetty and it supports Log4J by routing it through slf4j. I'd like to change that but I am not too familiar with the internals of jetty so that might take a bit. Ralph > On Sep 7, 2017, at 4:47 AM, Mikael St

Re: instantiation problem

2017-09-28 Thread Apache
mment there but as it is closed I would like to ring a bell here as well. > In Apache CloudStack, we have the the long overdue need to move to log4j2 so > I gave a stab at it and one of the obstackles is a thing called SshHelper. It > gets instantiated with a logger from a test class but t

Re: [jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-2121) DefaultRolloverStrategy max = 5 does not limit nuber of files

2017-11-16 Thread Apache
From your configuration the limit is 5 per rollover interval. You are specifying an interval of one day. Are you getting more than 5 per day? Ralph > On Nov 16, 2017, at 1:44 AM, Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki (JIRA) > wrote: > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2121?page=

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.10.0-rc1

2017-11-20 Thread Apache
t; I'll look at the checksums and the site next. > > Gary, could you run another clean build? > The error messages look strange: I cannot see any difference between the > expected and the actual result in the error output... > > > > Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132

Re: Event batch

2018-01-09 Thread Apache
The Logging api only allows you to log a single event at a time so it doesn’t make sense for an appender to have a method that accepts multiple events since it can’t happen. That said, appenders can queue the events and send them downstream in batches. I believe some of the appenders do that now

Re: Moving from Log4j 1.2 to Log4j 2.0 to handle concurrency/deadlocks/blocked threads issues.

2018-01-17 Thread Apache
Log4j 2 does not lock when calling appenders so you will not have the deadlock you show. Ralph > On Jan 17, 2018, at 4:28 AM, Vikas Mangla wrote: > > > > Just to update, the kind of deadlocks we observe in the application as > attached. > > > > From: Vikas Mangla > Sent: Wednesda

Re: [log4j] org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.mom.jeromq move?

2018-01-29 Thread Apache
I haven’t looked yet but make sure the new module dependencies are added to Log4J-distribution. Ralph > On Jan 29, 2018, at 6:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> >>> I s

Re: [log4j] clarify "internal" vs exported packages in core - plugin API

2018-01-30 Thread Apache
wrote: >> >> I think it’s possible to search for a commit hash in IntelliJ, but here is a >> github link: >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/commit/21bc3aa3bf8d8a043459c6a58e774b82a617a058 >> >> LOG4J2-2225 provide alias for SystemMillisClock so th

Re: release 2.11.0 site

2018-03-05 Thread Apache
We are using the latest version of the clirr plugin. Ralph > On Mar 5, 2018, at 9:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The site is using an old version of maven-site-plugin which in turns > depends (IIRC) on a version of Apache BCEL that does not know what to do > with Java 8 and/

Re: release 2.11.0 site

2018-03-05 Thread Apache
But that does give me an idea. If there is a newer version of bcel I can override the plugin to use it. I will try that tomorrow. Ralph > On Mar 5, 2018, at 11:12 PM, Apache wrote: > > We are using the latest version of the clirr plugin. > > Ralph > >> On Mar 5

Re: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.layout.AbstractStringLayout.getContentType() does not use Charset

2018-03-06 Thread Apache
But I would expect getContentType to return a mime type, not a charset. Ralph > On Mar 6, 2018, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Remko Popma wrote: >> >> Sorry, I don’t follow. >> Why not get the appender’s layout and get the charset by calling >> getCharse

Re: Building log4j2 from console supporting ANSI colors fails

2018-03-21 Thread Apache
Please do. Thanks! Ralph > On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:20 PM, Atle Tokle wrote: > > I made a fresh clone from master today, and looked into it myself. > In CommandLineHelpTest.java all the tests that is failing is instanciating > a Help class. In all cases it have an alternative constructor where yo

Re: Building log4j2 from console supporting ANSI colors fails

2018-03-21 Thread Apache
Obviously I didn’t see Remko’s reply before sending mine. Ralph > On Mar 21, 2018, at 4:57 AM, Apache wrote: > > Please do. Thanks! > > Ralph > >> On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:20 PM, Atle Tokle wrote: >> >> I made a fresh clone from master tod

Re: [VOTE] Migrate git repositories to gitbox

2018-04-30 Thread Apache
e existing git-wip-us >> infrastructure >>>> to >>>>>> the currently supported gitbox infrastructure that Infra advocates >>> for >>>>>> using nowadays. Using gitbox will allow our projects to integrate >>>> better >>>

Re: Log4j-audit release

2018-06-10 Thread Apache
Ok. I will take a look in the morning. Sent from my iPad > On Jun 10, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > That is with > C:\Users\remko\IdeaProjects\logging-log4j-audit-sample>mvn --version > Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; > 2017

Re: Log4j-audit release

2018-06-10 Thread Apache
Oh. You don’t have the maven plugin. Since it hasn’t been released yet you will have to build the Log4J audit project. Sent from my iPad > On Jun 10, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > That is with > C:\Users\remko\IdeaProjects\logging-log4j-audit-sample>mvn --version

Re: Log4j-audit release

2018-06-10 Thread Apache
helpful. Ralph > On Jun 10, 2018, at 1:36 AM, Apache wrote: > > Oh. You don’t have the maven plugin. Since it hasn’t been released yet you > will have to build the Log4J audit project. > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Jun 10, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Remko Popma wrote: >>

Re: Log4j-audit release

2018-06-11 Thread Apache
u say that’s accurate? > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 00:54, Apache wrote: >> >> One thing I forgot to mention. Although Log4J audit doesn’t make use of >> the product or category the catalog’s usefulness really comes into play >> when you want to create a UI to query

Re: Reminder - [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

2018-06-17 Thread Apache
gt;>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Jun 14, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Ralph Goers >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Matt. Gary replied that he had started reviewing it 2 days OK. >>>> Mik

Re: CI for Log4j Audit

2019-05-07 Thread Apache
If you are familiar with Jenkins you should just be able to create one. Ralph > On May 7, 2019, at 12:53 AM, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to see if there's a CI job defined for the Audit project. > > I'm looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Logging/ and I don't > see o

Re: Hide message in throwable

2019-05-24 Thread Apache
The code you highlight is there to include the throwable converter if one is not specified. If you add your own throwable converter then handlesThrowable will be true and that code won’t be run. You can also hide the exception with %noex. Under what circumstances do you want to hide the excepti

Re: PR for LOG4J2-2639

2019-06-23 Thread Apache
n Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:24, Ralph Goers >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Gary Gregory >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I would dro

Re: Location performance

2019-07-07 Thread Apache
Yes, that was a very interesting read and describes very well how JMH works. Ralph > On Jul 7, 2019, at 4:30 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > This may be of interest: > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333825812_What's_Wrong_With_My_Benchmark_Results_Studying_Bad_Practices_in_JMH_Benchmarks >

Re: Due-to in changes.xml

2019-08-13 Thread Apache
As I said, no one with commit privs should appear in the due-to. Ever. They already appear in the by column and in git. It diminishes the thanks we give to contributors to add ourselves, so I would request you please stop doing that, frankly I am not sure why you started as I don’t recall seeing

Re: Send LogEvent time as timestamp to Kafka Producer when using KafkaAppender

2019-08-21 Thread Apache
final Exception e) {126 >if (e != null) {127 > LOGGER.error("Unable to write to Kafka in appender [" + getName() + > "]", e);128}129 }130 >});131}132}133} > &

Blog post

2019-12-16 Thread Apache
I thought you all might be interested in this - https://www.ralphgoers.com/home/why-was-log4j-2-created. I plan to write a few entries on what is new in Log4J. Ralph

Re: Modularization

2020-03-08 Thread Apache
I have no plans to do this in master. One of the main goals of 3.0 is to be fully modularized. This is just one part of that. Ralph > On Mar 8, 2020, at 5:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Is this worthy doing in 2.0? In 3 we can do whatever we want IMO. > > Gary > >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 23:2

Re: Modularization

2020-03-08 Thread Apache
Rats. Substitute “no plans” with “only plans”. Ralph > On Mar 8, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Apache wrote: > > I have no plans to do this in master. One of the main goals of 3.0 is to be > fully modularized. This is just one part of that. > > Ralph > >> On Mar 8, 202

Re: TimeFilterTest

2020-03-09 Thread Apache
I started testing this. It doesn’t handle daylight savings at all and some of the tests make no sense. I’m rewriting it using java.time and implementing better tests. Ralph > On Mar 8, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Is anyone else having problems with TimeFilterTest in core today?

Re: log4net: resurrection

2020-04-06 Thread Apache
No one is ever happy moving a project to dormant status. But it is unfair to users to let them think the project is being maintained when the reality is quite different than that. The main issue that needs to be overcome is getting a release out. The ASF has some requirements around releases

Re: log4net: resurrection

2020-04-06 Thread Apache
ough it's all MS based via > TFS and MSTest). > > Having said that, it sounds like Mr McColl has a strong interest in keeping > it alive, and I'd be happy to offer assistance in any way he finds > beneficial. > > Thanks. > >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:50 AM A

Re: log4net: resurrection

2020-04-07 Thread Apache
ortunately, this would suggest that forking and publishing under a >>> different package name is probably the best idea. There are, as noted >>> before, 34 stagnated pull requests currently at GitHub, many of which >>> haven't seen any attention since 2018. It would se

Re: Json Template Layout

2020-05-22 Thread Apache
Feel free to merge it. I will test it there when I can. Ralph > On May 22, 2020, at 4:50 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Hey Ralph, > > Here is my status update: > > -~- Benchmarks -~- > > I have removed the benchmarks results. It takes ~8h for a complete run > and I don't want to repeat that

Re: Testing Json Template Layout

2020-07-22 Thread Apache
Yes, please do. Ralph > On Jul 22, 2020, at 6:22 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Ralph, I am fine with the current state of the plugin. I don't intend to > have further improvements in the short-term regarding KeyValuePair > enhancements and/or escape character handling. If you are okay with it,

Re: Literals in Velocity Templates

2020-08-20 Thread Apache
Don’t convert whole files. You only need to convert where there is an existing document that is xdoc that needs to be updated. Ralph > On Aug 19, 2020, at 11:53 PM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Hello, > > I have started cherry-picking JsonTemplateLayout from master into > release-2.x. There I wa

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-08-23 Thread Apache
account are stored in the private >>> repos of >>> >> >> logging >>> >> >> >>>>> pmc. Most members of the pmc should be in the set of recipients >>> >> with >>> >> >> their >>> >> &

Re: Log4net: 2.0.9 release notes missing

2020-08-24 Thread Apache
I do not believe the site has been updated to reflect the release. I looked into it but couldn’t figure out how to build the site. Ralph > On Aug 24, 2020, at 6:38 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > Hi > > People noticed that the release notes of 2.0.9 are missing while they > should be document

Re: JsonTemplateLayout is ready to be shipped!

2020-08-27 Thread Apache
No, you are not expected to do anything else. While anyone can be the release manager, typically I have been doing them. They take a fair amount of time so I typically start them on a weekend when I have enough time. Ralph > On Aug 27, 2020, at 6:14 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Would anybod

Re: A little stuck with publishing updated site / docs for log4net 2.0.9

2020-08-28 Thread Apache
I will take care of the main logging site. It currently uses the ASF CMS but we have to get off of it so there isn’t much point in you having to learn how to deal with it. Ralph > On Aug 28, 2020, at 12:26 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi all > > I've been trying to update content for http://

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

2020-09-02 Thread Apache
release! I’m sure you’ve just made a lot of >>>> developers happy. :D >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:40 Davyd McColl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, log4net 2.0.9 is up on nuget.org (: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release log4net 2.0.10

2020-09-10 Thread Apache
d thing. Some of these changes are >> required to resolve issues for netstandard2.0 users who have upgraded to >> 2.0.9. Community member NicholasNoise put in a lot of work on this. >> >> If it helps, the original PR is here: >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/

Re: [log4net] cleaning up JIRA

2020-09-10 Thread Apache
It is good that you are letting others know your plans. As the only formal Log4Net committer you are free to do whatever works for you. Hopefully that won’t remain the case forever. Ralph > On Sep 10, 2020, at 2:17 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi all > > I'd like to start (at some point) cl

Re: JsonTemplateLayout is ready to be shipped!

2020-09-11 Thread Apache
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:55 PM Apache wrote: >> >> No, you are not expected to do anything else. While anyone can be the >> release manager, typically I have been doing them. They take a fair amount >> of time so I typically start them on a weekend when I have enou

Re: [log4cxx] Site / Documentation thoughts

2020-09-19 Thread Apache
You can >> always just run it from the command line although that requires installing >> JBake on your computer. > >> The documentation for log4cxx is already maintained in its own repo. I moved >> it a couple of weeks ago. It is now at >> https://github.com/apache/

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

2020-10-26 Thread Apache
gt; >> On Sep 22, 2020, at 11:21 PM, Davyd McColl wrote: >> >> Thanks all; I've completed the release as far as I can (Ralph, please push >> the relevant artifacts from >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel%2F2.0.11 the last >> mile

Re: Log4j 2.14.0 release status

2020-11-01 Thread Apache
:08 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Very odd indeed, the public (non-snapshot) repository is full of snapshots: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j-core/ > > Gary > >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2020, 00:51 Ralph Goers wrote: &

Re: Tidying up JIRA after 2.14.0 release

2020-11-13 Thread Apache
I will take care of 1 & 2 and will check your Jira permissions. The next release will be 2.14.1 unless new enhancements are added. Our general policy has been to mark issues resolved and ask users to close them when they verify the fix. It would be nice if Jira would automatically close them af

Re: unable to build from source

2020-12-09 Thread Apache
>> > and I'm not failing the same thing anymore. >> > >> > But I'm still getting errors, this time it is failing some unit tests from >> > the surefire plugin. I tried to fix it but I couldn't. >> > >> > >> > >> > From rea

Re: Another JsonTemplateLayout question on StackOverflow....

2021-03-31 Thread Apache
I just go periodically and search for “Log4j2” newest. Ralph > On Mar 31, 2021, at 4:32 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Thanks! Replied. > > Ralph, how do you track SO questions? I am watching log4j and log4j2 tags, > though I don't see any notifications. In particular, I was expecting to get >

Re: Please do not commit to log4j2 master - but review this PR.

2021-04-01 Thread Apache
java allocation >> instrumenter wasn’t working and it had to be upgraded too. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>>> On Mar 29, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>> >>>> I’ll make sure to look more closely at it this week. Nice work o

Re: Review request: LOG4J2-3004 JsonTemplateLayout plugin support

2021-04-03 Thread Apache
Yazıcı >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have created a GitHub PR (#476) >>> <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/476> addressing >> LOG4J2-3004 >>> JsonTemplateLayout plugin support >>> <https://issue

Re: Switching Spring Boot from Logback to Log4j

2021-04-06 Thread Apache
Yes, I saw the update when I woke up in the middle of the night. We use Spring a lot at Nextiva so making the two interoperate nicely is important to me. Ralph > On Apr 6, 2021, at 6:23 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > For those who don't know yet, Spring Boot considers switching from Logback > t

Re: [logging-pipelines] branch master updated: Use Java 11 for master branch

2021-04-06 Thread Apache
Can we not require a Jenkinsfile in each project that sets properties to control the behavior? Ralph > On Apr 6, 2021, at 6:45 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Oops, good point. I need to make the version selection a little more > sophisticated. Probably a branch or something for the shared lib. >

Re: Running "master" tests in IntelliJ IDEA after Java 11 upgrade

2021-04-07 Thread Apache
:14 PM, Volkan Yazıcı >> wrote: >>>> >>>> As subject hints, I am not able to run tests in IDEA anymore after Java >> 11 >>>> upgrade. I have deleted all IDEA related files and issued a clean Maven >>>> build: >>>> >>&g

Re: Log levels on a schedule

2021-05-03 Thread Apache
That would be exactly right. I would create a TimeFilter that is very much like the DynamicThresholdFilter but instead of using an MDC key it woul use a time frame. This would be interesting as it could be implemented to either check the time in the event for every request or it could create a

Re: Log4Go

2021-07-09 Thread Apache
fluence ... not a git repo. >> And I guess I can help with all the getting started, once we've decided >> on a plan. >> >> Chris >> >>> On 07.07.21 09:52, Davyd McColl wrote: >>> Hi Ralph >>> >>> I can't create a repo unde

Re: Json Template Layout event delimiter

2021-09-13 Thread Apache
I don’t think anyone passing an escape sequence expects it to show up as a string. So I would be good with your proposed solution. That method should be part of core so we can modify all Layouts to use it. Ralph > On Sep 13, 2021, at 12:29 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > I had addressed this is

Re: broken Log4j2Plugins.dat in the shaded benchmarks.jar of log4j-perf

2021-10-13 Thread Apache
We could include it in Log4J. Does master work out of the box? Ralph > On Oct 13, 2021, at 12:23 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > >  > I have done something really nasty in the release-2.x branch to fix > benchmarks.jar generated by log4j-perf. Since a picture is worth a thousand > words, I am sha

Re: maven-shaded-log4j-transformer

2021-10-15 Thread Apache
l-lists.html>. >> For instance, the module name, transformer name, documentation changes, >> etc. >> This will give others an opportunity to share their feedback and remarks. >> Then simply create a JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LOG4J2> >> ticket and

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-18 Thread Apache
GitHub+Pages >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:35 PM Ralph Goers >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don’t really understand this. When I was migrating the web site from >>

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

2021-10-19 Thread Apache
:14 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > In its current state, all Logging Services projects (log4j, log4jcxx, > log4net, etc.) dump their websites to a single repository: > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-site If I need to publish > continuous benchmark results of logging-log4j2 rep

Re: How to inject a dependency into a custom filter.

2021-10-21 Thread Apache
It sounds to me like you want to create a new type of plugin similar to PatternConerters. I am curious as to what your filter does. Is it something that would be useful to others so that we would be interested in including it? Ralph > On Oct 21, 2021, at 6:07 AM, Adwait Kumar Singh > wrote: >

Re: How to inject a dependency into a custom filter.

2021-10-21 Thread Apache
trying to > finish up some work on > Apache Flume so it can get a new release and I need to do some other work > here as we > are overdue for a release. > > Ralph > >> On Oct 21, 2021, at 11:28 AM, Adwait Kumar Singh >> wrote: >> >> The problem I am s

Re: changes.xml

2021-12-08 Thread Apache
requires knowing now the changes plugin passes data to Doxia and what >> Doxia is going to do to >> render it. If you look at >> https://github.com/apache/maven-changes-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/changes/ChangesReportGenerator.java >> in the

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

2021-12-22 Thread Apache
https://github.com/apache/log4j was read-only. The new repo is not. Ralph > On Dec 22, 2021, at 11:34 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I have cloned the read-only log4j repo to > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j1. > > I have followed the build instructions and had to

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

2021-12-23 Thread Apache
mir Sitnikov > wrote: > > Leo>Instead of or in addition to some of those fixes > > I would suggest the following (in case you wonder, I might volunteer to do > ALL of that, so don't assume I just sit and tell others how things should > be done): > 1. Use the exis

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

2021-12-23 Thread Apache
Thanks Leo. I was using Java 8 with maven 3 in a Linux VM. I don’t think maven 3 runs on Java 6. Ralph > On Dec 23, 2021, at 5:11 AM, Leo Simons wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 12:39, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> It is still the middle of the night for me so I won’t do anything for >> severa

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

2021-12-23 Thread Apache
tch the branch name of our other repos? > > Gary > >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 1:34 AM Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> >> I have cloned the read-only log4j repo to >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j1. >> >> I have followed the build instructions

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

2021-12-23 Thread Apache
es harder by requesting Java >> 1.6 >> looks like an overkill. >> >> I think there's no way to install Java 1.6 on modern macOS. > > Correct. I would suggest Docker, if there is a way to install it there. > > Here is some more installation instructions: &

Re: Log4J 1.x progress, pull request(s), plans

2021-12-23 Thread Apache
wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021, at 14:05, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> One of the difficulties was likely related to building the Windows DLLs >>>> for >>>> using the Windows Event Log Appender ( >>>> >>> >> htt

Re: RELEASE-NOTES.md

2021-12-24 Thread Apache
of `changes.xml`? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Kristjan Esperanto > Date: Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:08 PM > Subject: [apache/logging-log4j2] Add Link to Release History (PR #642) > To: apache/logging-log4j2 > Cc: Subscribed > > > It's a mi

Re: RELEASE-NOTES.md

2021-12-24 Thread Apache
I should have added that you should not delete it. Ralph > On Dec 24, 2021, at 7:00 AM, Apache wrote: > > The release notes file is generated for every release. > > Ralph > >> On Dec 24, 2021, at 6:20 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >> >> Is this file still r

Re: Setting default branch to release-2.x on GitHub

2021-12-26 Thread Apache
Infra has a mailing list and a slack channel. Ralph > On Dec 26, 2021, at 6:00 AM, Carter Kozak wrote: > > I filed an infra ticket for this, but it hasn’t been picked up yet: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22641 > Might be worth emailing someone? Otherwise they may be busy with

Re: [logging-log4j2] branch release-2.x updated: LOG4J2-3289: Fix log4j-to-slf4j re-interpolation of formatted message data

2021-12-26 Thread Apache
540e769d98c42d018fa1bc1b8 > Author: Carter Kozak > AuthorDate: Sat Dec 25 11:48:20 2021 -0500 > >LOG4J2-3289: Fix log4j-to-slf4j re-interpolation of formatted message data > --- > .../java/org/apache/logging/slf4j/SLF4JLogger.java | 28 ++ > .../java/org/apache/l

Re: [logging-log4j2] branch release-2.x updated: [LOG4J2-3256] Reduce ignored package scope of KafkaAppender #640.

2021-12-26 Thread Apache
Please don’t forget to apply this to the master branch. Ralph > On Dec 26, 2021, at 6:31 AM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > ggregory pushed a commit to branch release-2.x > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf

Re: Should lookups be split out or otherwise disabled by default?

2022-01-14 Thread Apache
The answer is - it depends. Although we might consider using the properties proposal I made in master many of the lookups should default to being enabled or enabled under a condition. For example, the spring lookup only works when spring boot is present. It would be stupid for it not to be enabl

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Release Plugin Version 1.8.0

2022-04-02 Thread Apache
Wrong list Ralph > On Apr 2, 2022, at 5:08 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >  We just released our release tool, Apache Commons Release Plugin Version > 1.8.0: > An Apache Maven Mojo for Apache Commons Release tasks. > > Historical list of changes: > https://commons.a

Re: Considering porting DI to 2.x

2022-04-18 Thread Apache
Lol. Ok An app running in Java 11. That changes nothing. We can certainly make some incompatible changes but as we have previously discussed some of the things you removed will have to be reverted. Making Log4J 3 not backward compatible would be a disaster. Ralph > On Apr 18, 2022, at 5:07 PM,

Re: Consuming our own BOM

2022-05-30 Thread Apache
It is implemented on master. Ralph > On May 30, 2022, at 2:27 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Mind somebody sharing the last state? Is it implemented, if so how and on > which branch(es)? Is it reverted? If so, totally or partially? > >> On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 9:53 AM Ralph Goers >> wrote: >>

Re: [logging-log4j2] branch master updated: [LOG4J2-3459] - Add LoggingSystemProvider SPI

2022-10-31 Thread Apache
vider::getInstance which >>>> can be implemented using Injector in Log4j Core. The general utility class >>>> for working with this provider is available as an internal (util3) class >>>> in LoggingSystem. Test fixture helper classes have also been updated to &

Re: [logging-log4j2] branch master updated: [LOG4J2-3459] - Add LoggingSystemProvider SPI

2022-10-31 Thread Apache
l package and > export it to other Log4j modules. That makes sense. > > And LoggingSystem probably doesn’t need a Lazy instance of itself, right. > > — > Matt Sicker > >> On Oct 31, 2022, at 20:58, Apache wrote: >> >>  >> >> See be

Re: Broken build

2022-11-17 Thread Apache
Consistent Ralph > On Nov 16, 2022, at 5:23 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Is this a consistent failure or random? > >> On Nov 16, 2022, at 3:42 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> I haven’t run a build in a while and looking at the recent commits I am not >> sure what is causing this, but some chang

Re: Maven site failure

2022-12-30 Thread Apache
False is the default so I left it alone. It also means it is specified in less places. Ralph > On Dec 30, 2022, at 5:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Should that setting be flipped such that a Maven module ask to be Javadoc'd? > > Gary > >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2022, 07:23 Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >>

Re: Jira emails

2017-04-12 Thread Apache
Nevermind. I think Gavin fixed it. I imagine Jenkins has to be modified as well. > On Apr 11, 2017, at 11:50 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Matt, > > It seems Jira is still configured to send to the individual lists. I don’t > seem to have rights to change that. I have asked Gavin to fix that in

Re: [Log4j] Plans for modularization

2017-04-24 Thread Apache
We have to do something. I am about 3/4 of the way creating java9 modules and I am not happy with core at all. Far too many classes have to be exported as you can only name packages, not classes. I think all the configuration stuff will need to stay in core, which means the optional dependency

Re: Roadmap

2017-04-24 Thread Apache
Gary, you are missing the point. We are not "going" to java 9. We will be providing support for it. There was nothing we had to do to support java 8, but there are changes that must be made, like using StackWalker and being modularized, for Log4J to be usable by everyone who moves to java 9. If

Re: [log4j] Log4j Java 9 support has been added

2017-04-26 Thread Apache
You could try using java 9 Sent from my iPad > On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > Now I cannot build the project in IntelliJ IDEA anymore. It complains that > lambda expressions are not supported in Java 7 in StackWalkerStackLocator. > > Any suggestions? > > On Fri, Apr 21

Re: [log4net] git repository is online

2017-04-27 Thread Apache
-log4net.git >> >> github integration is enabled for this repository and therefore it is >> mirrored to github here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net >> >> Please do not commit to the svn repository anymore! That repository is about

Re: Java 9 modules

2017-05-09 Thread Apache
I read that previously but if Log4J implements modules I don't see how the nodal appenders or flume appender can work. I also got a reply to my query about referencing dependencies that are not yet modularized and the recommendation is to only use the manifest entry and not have a module-info.j

Re: Java 9 modules

2017-05-09 Thread Apache
n Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Apache wrote: >> >> I read that previously but if Log4J implements modules I don't see how the >> nodal appenders or flume appender can work. >> >> I also got a reply to my query about referencing dependencies that are not >&

Re: Java 9 modules

2017-05-09 Thread Apache
Yes, although we could fully modularize the API right away. Ralph > On May 9, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Apache wrote: >> >> Technically you are considered modularized just by adding a manifest entry >> providin

Re: Java 9 modules

2017-05-10 Thread Apache
It will require that modules that have Log4J plugins declare the package containing the plugins as "open" to Log4J. Apparently we will also have to call Module.addReads() to be able to access the module. Ralph Sent from my iPad > On May 10, 2017, at 2:40 AM, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > > As fa

Re: [Log4j] Recursive logging when an appender's dependency logs itself

2017-05-11 Thread Apache
l does not protect > against this as far as I can see. I have put in some protection in > KafkaAppender: > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/mom/kafka/KafkaAppender.java#L133 > > Without th

Re: [log4j2] org.apache.logging.log4j.message.MapMessage String vs. Object values.

2017-06-07 Thread Apache
The reason managers were split from the appender sis because appender are recreated during reconfiguration while managers are reused. Ralph > On Jun 7, 2017, at 1:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > I've completed all the clean ups I think were needed in the > GenericMapMessageSimple b

Re: Classes found in the wrong directory: {META-INF/versions/9/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/StackLocator.class=org.apache.logging.log4j.util.StackLocator}

2017-07-06 Thread Apache
og4j:log4j-api:jar:2.9-SNAPSHOT : > Classes found in the wrong directory: > {META-INF/versions/9/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/ > StackLocator.class=org.apache.logging.log4j.util.StackLocator} > [ERROR] Error(s) found in manifest configuration > [INFO] > ---

Re: Classes found in the wrong directory: {META-INF/versions/9/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/StackLocator.class=org.apache.logging.log4j.util.StackLocator}

2017-07-06 Thread Apache
(default) @ log4j-api --- > [ERROR] Manifest org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:jar:2.9-SNAPSHOT : > Classes found in the wrong directory: > {META-INF/versions/9/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/ > StackLocator.class=org.apache.logging.log4j.util.StackLocator} > [ERROR] Error(s) fou

Re: Playing with Android...

2017-07-08 Thread Apache
It already is. Sent from my iPad > On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We are worst off with our 2.9-SNAPSHOT, I can't even build an app using > only log4j-api: > > AGPBI: {"kind":"error","text":"Error converting bytecode to dex:\nCause: > Dex cannot parse version 53 byte code.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >