GitHub user kwakeroni added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
I have the same issue.
The release notes say "the processor will fail
GitHub user ratoaq2 edited a discussion: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor is missing the required
`log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId` options
Hi all,
I have a java 21 maven project which uses eclipse compiler
org.codehaus.plex
GitHub user THausherr added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Same for me with Apache PDFBox. What I noticed is that it works when
GitHub user ftreede added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
It is automatically registered via META-INF services. So the only way t
GitHub user ppkarwasz added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Nice catch! :100:
Somehow `only` ended up in my example, which disabl
GitHub user ppkarwasz added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
@THausherr,
I couldn't reproduce your problems with PDFBox. I submit
GitHub user ratoaq2 added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
the proc none didn't seem to work for me...
It seems I got it working
GitHub user ratoaq2 edited a comment on the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
It seems I got it working with proc none plus empty annotation proces
GitHub user ratoaq2 added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
It seems a bit cumbersome for a project that has nothing to do with Gra
GitHub user ppkarwasz added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
The warning in the release notes warning is a simplified explanation
GitHub user ppkarwasz added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Hi @kwakeroni,
There’s **no dedicated flag** to turn `GraalVmProcess
GitHub user THausherr edited a comment on the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
I tried the last change with default-compile and now the project tha
GitHub user ppkarwasz edited a comment on the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Hi @ratoaq2,
Thanks for the detailed error log — it's very helpful.
GitHub user THausherr added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Thank you! It builds successfully now. I see you also made a (slightl
I have a similar problem reviewing Log4j email. The flood of GitHub
notifications makes it difficult to review anymore.
> On Jun 17, 2025, at 11:01, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> I am actively working on Log4j-Audit at the moment. I am currently upgrading
> it to all the latest dependencies. Once I
GitHub user THausherr added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
```
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-co
GitHub user ppkarwasz added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Hi @ratoaq2,
Thanks for the detailed error log — it's very helpful.
GitHub user ppkarwasz edited a comment on the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Hi @ratoaq2,
Thanks for the detailed error log — it's very helpful.
GitHub user THausherr added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
I tried the last change with default-compile and now the project that
GitHub user THausherr added a comment to the discussion:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The `GraalVmProcessor` annotation processor
is missing the required `log4j.graalvm.groupId` and `log4j.graalvm.artifactId`
options
Thank you! I also suggest that the log4j documentation be updated, wi
20 matches
Mail list logo