GitHub user ppkarwasz added a comment to the discussion: Timeline for
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:3.0.0 release?
Thank you for the clarification. As far as I’m aware, the Log4j API itself
doesn’t directly depend on Java EE 8 or Jakarta EE 9 APIs. Could you point to
the specific usage o
GitHub user ppkarwasz added a comment to the discussion: Timeline for
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:3.0.0 release?
There will be **no `3.0.0` release of the [Log4j
API](https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/api.html)**. This is
intentional: both Log4j Core 2 and Log4j Core 3 are de
GitHub user garydgregory added a comment to the discussion: Timeline for
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:3.0.0 release?
And welcome to the pain and confusing we are forcing on our users with this
confusing version policy 😞
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/discussions
GitHub user jluehe added a comment to the discussion: Timeline for
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:3.0.0 release?
@ppkarwasz, we are looking for a Jakarta EE9 compatible version of
`org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api`. We found that version `2.24.3` is not
Jakarta EE9 compatible (as it con
GitHub user jluehe added a comment to the discussion: Timeline for
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:3.0.0 release?
Thanks for your response, @ppkarwasz!
Yes, the `javax` reference in `Constants.java` is "benign".
The problematic reference is here:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2
