Thanks for chasing this Piotr. Given the recently stagnating Log4j
maintainer time, the workflow of verifying dependabot PRs, adding
associated changelog entries, and automatically merging upon success was a
big time saver for us. I'd really appreciate it if we can bring it back.
In GHA workflows,
Hi Volkan,
On 13.05.2025 11:06, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> Thanks for chasing this Piotr. Given the recently stagnating Log4j
> maintainer time, the workflow of verifying dependabot PRs, adding
> associated changelog entries, and automatically merging upon success was a
> big time saver for us. I'd re
GitHub user ElaHuskovic68 added a comment to the discussion: log4j-1.2.13.jar
substitution in v.2.17.1
hi @ppkarwasz - thank you for your answer.
This is third party application, I dont have source code, only war file which
contains 1.x version of log4j jar file. I checked with Owner and it lo
GitHub user perry2of5 added a comment to the discussion: log4j-1.2.13.jar
substitution in v.2.17.1
Some people have been known to recommend Reload4j 1.2.18 as a replacement for
log4j 1.2.17
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/discussions/3656#discussioncomment-13135934
---
GitHub user lalo-mx added a comment to the discussion: log4j-1.2.13.jar
substitution in v.2.17.1
> Some people have been known to recommend Reload4j 1.2.18 as a replacement for
> log4j 1.2.17
https://reload4j.qos.ch/
> Initiated by Ceki Gülcü, the original author of Apache log4j 1.x, the
>
