On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:15 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 2, 2024, at 3:51 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz
> wrote:
> >
> > This would be the same setting as in Commons Logging, so I guess I would
> be OK with that, if we keep an extension mechanism in the API. We could
> probably split the impleme
Hi Gary,
On 3.11.2024 13:23, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 11:15 PM Ralph Goers
wrote:
I think you missed my point. I don’t think Log4j-core, Logback or whatever
should need to implement anything. The point of such an API is to provide a
standard API that implements whatever is ne
Gary,
On 25.10.2024 08:19, Ralph Goers wrote:
With the changes that have been made the bridges only have a dependency on
Logj4 API - which is only in the 2.x branch. Should these artifacts only be on
the 2.x branch as well?
These bridges don’t change nearly as often as core or even api do. IM
