Hi Christian,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 21:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Please vote:
>
> [] +1, label Flume as dormant
> [] -1, don't label Flume as dormant because...
+1, label Flume as dormant
Honestly I have a lot of work on Log4j and I can not spare time to
even release Flume. I did try to
-1
Ralph
> On Oct 3, 2024, at 4:00 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 at 21:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Please vote:
>>
>> [] +1, label Flume as dormant
>> [] -1, don't label Flume as dormant because...
>
> +1, label Flume as dormant
>
> Honestly I h
FWIW, I don't think apache voting guidelines allow for "you can only vote a
certain way only if ..."
Gary
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, 3:30 PM Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have discussed this in the past. I hope we can pick up a decent dev
> speed with Flume after we adopt it. I
+1
Op wo 2 okt 2024 om 21:30 schreef Christian Grobmeier
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have discussed this in the past. I hope we can pick up a decent dev
> speed with Flume after we adopt it. I don't regret moving it into Logging
> Services, but we have not seen any significant movement.
>
> This me
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024, at 18:10, Gary Gregory wrote:
> FWIW, I don't think apache voting guidelines allow for "you can only vote a
> certain way only if ..."
That's why I wrote:
"Please CONSIDER voting ONLY -1, if:"
Cheers,
Christian
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2024, 3:30 PM Christian Grobmeier
+1
On 2 October 2024 21:29:44 CEST, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>We have discussed this in the past. I hope we can pick up a decent dev speed
>with Flume after we adopt it. I don't regret moving it into Logging Services,
>but we have not seen any significant movement.
>
>This
