Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 3.0.0

2024-09-16 Thread Gary Gregory
I don't think I saw a [RESULT] message with a tally of the result. Gary On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 3:26 PM Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi > > Apologies for the late response. FWIW, my +1 too. > > -d > > > On 15 September 2024 20:59:13 Jan Friedrich wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > and here is my +1. > > > > W

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 3.0.0

2024-09-16 Thread Jan Friedrich
Hi Gary, please see https://lists.apache.org/thread/v8kyxz7zdvp3cypo1506yflk3bbvysym I did not change the subject to [RESULT]. Regards. Jan On 16 September 2024 15:17:06 CEST, Gary Gregory wrote: >I don't think I saw a [RESULT] message with a tally of the result. > >Gary > >On Sun, Sep 15, 20

Re: Can't build log4j main branch

2024-09-16 Thread Gary D. Gregory
I just pulled main since we've had changes there, now I get: [ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.31 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.SocketAppenderReconnectTest [ERROR] org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.SocketAppenderReconne

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Log4net 3.0.0

2024-09-16 Thread Gary Gregory
Ah, thank you. Gary On Mon, Sep 16, 2024, 9:50 AM Jan Friedrich wrote: > Hi Gary, > > please see > https://lists.apache.org/thread/v8kyxz7zdvp3cypo1506yflk3bbvysym > > I did not change the subject to [RESULT]. > > Regards. > > Jan > > On 16 September 2024 15:17:06 CEST, Gary Gregory > wrote: >

Re: Can't build log4j main branch

2024-09-16 Thread Piotr P. Karwasz
Hi Gary, On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 16:50, Gary D. Gregory wrote: > > I just pulled main since we've had changes there, now I get: > > [ERROR] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.31 > s <<< FAILURE! -- in > org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.SocketAppenderReconne

Re: Can't build log4j main branch

2024-09-16 Thread Volkan Yazıcı
Gary has a failure on L361, that is, it retries every 100ms to succeed with `logger.info()` for at most 2mins. I doubt if more waiting will solve the problem. I tried to improve that test several times (see its history), but Windows just behaves weird with sockets. I'd appreciate it if Windows user